Lmao every other thread has the o.p. saying..."PW is on this so i will play it and parlay with my own losing pick. PW wins when he loses and when he wins on all favorites and never on an underdog, he's writing the book on how to gamble. Lol some of you should be ashamed to appoint this guy like a role model here and you know who you are. Fend for yourself. ...create your own way. The thinking outside the box here has stopped. Originality is few and far between from what I've seen here this season. Everyone thinks favorites and overs are your best bet now lmao
I may construct a massive extremely detailed game-log of all of PENNYWISE's plays up to date
so we can all analyze situations like this.
From my memory, I do recall several instances where a total involving the same teams will win after
PENNYWISE loses one the previous session.
PENNYWISE lost the Boston-NY Yankees OVER 9.5 -115 on Saturday 16th.
Chances are very good the Boston-NY Yankees OVER 7.5 -110 will hit today, Sunday 17th.
Let's see if the theory holds!
!/Ashamed? PENNYWISE is a documented winner, and he deserves all the kudos he receives here at the Rx.
Are you upset he gets the most attention and his threads get the most views? :think2:
You can't argue his record, specifically on SIDES:
41-5 ATS (+37.64 units) at 89.13%
It's 100% documented. Why not take advantage of his ability to post SIDE winners like many of us do?
Who cares if the plays are "favorites." They're winning, aren't they?
When PENNYWISE posts a SIDE, why shouldn't people trust his handicapping acumen and skills?
His record speaks for itself.
First off his record means shit to me because if you play all favorites that means your ROI is shit. And in baseball your ROI means everything. Also found it funny that he didn't mention he was betting a dime every game until he had already hit a handful of favorites. It wasn't a documented record that he was keeping ever. Never stated all wagers were a dime until he was already up. Just saying. Nextly, you have xopy cats who think this is the right approach now. Favorites and overs. It's funny. I'm good on me bruh. I don't need to follow nobody for one. And I sure as hell am not about to play a side strictly because a capper lost on that exact game yesterday. My point is this forum is dumbing down. Post side winners like many of us do? Wait what? Huh? Are you talking about me?!? I assume you are not because that wouldn't make any sense. And you shouldn't say "us" because all you do is track cappers plays on here. A favorite run shows me he can just post favorites and go on a run. And that's why you see so many wannabe copycats now because who can't lay -160 and win? Like I said I wouldn't be so quick to make dude a role model here lol like what I am seeing from others. Jealously aint in my nature partna. I just see the forum slipping right now. No originality
It's cool, I understand where Mob is coming from. But this play is my own with a little of PW angle. I don't play all his losing play. You can say the series is due for an over or the majority are on the under so I play the over etc. I just don't post a lot or do my write up. But if there's an angle I like to point it out to my Rx ers.
Good of luck all ,,,, and I always play the Banker in Bacrat
Good of luck all ,,,, and I always play the Banker in Bacrat
Wow, mobdeeper, don't think I have ever heard so much drivel and nonsense. Pennywise has a winning record, a very good record, betting 1 unit a game. It shows consistently he can identify winning plays.
I've seen people betting underdogs and under primarily and losing big time. So that way isn't the panacea to long term winning. I've seen others bet favourites predominantly and have a losing record.
Pennywise from what I see has his own style of wagering so let him do it, as it seems successful to me.
I'd say as well there are other good capers on the forum all with their own unique approach to attempting to win money.
What else I know is mobeeper is a known troublemaker and agitator here so it's no surprise to see him starting cap here today.
Anyway good luck to all in their wagering, however they want to do it.
JC
I've seen people betting underdogs and under primarily and losing big time. So that way isn't the panacea to long term winning. I've seen others bet favourites predominantly and have a losing record.
Pennywise from what I see has his own style of wagering so let him do it, as it seems successful to me.
I'd say as well there are other good capers on the forum all with their own unique approach to attempting to win money.
What else I know is mobeeper is a known troublemaker and agitator here so it's no surprise to see him starting cap here today.
Anyway good luck to all in their wagering, however they want to do it.
JC
For someone who says they're not "jealous" of PENNYWISE and his success, you're sure coming off as you are. Why are you
making such a big deal on how he handicaps games? Who cares if he picks favorites and overs? His record speaks for itself.
You're questioning the amount of money he bets on each play? Who cares? It could be $1 to $1000. Bottom line, his plays are winning!
Again, his SIDE record YTD so far the 2016 MLB season is: 41-5 ATS (+37.64 units) at 89.13%
What are your SIDES record for this 2016 MLB season? Is it as good as PENNYWISE'S? If so, people need to go to your thread.
If you don't know your SIDE record, I can go to your thread and find out. I'll post your 2016 MLB SIDES record here in this thread. Sound good?
I've been following PENNYWISE since Day 1 of this MLB season, and he's made me a nice pile of loot. That's undisputed. He's made money
for many of us here. "Us" = his regular followers. Many who post on a regular basis in his daily threads and also lurk.
Don't hate the player, hate the game. If you get on a hot run, you'll be recognized. You know full well that's the nature of the business here.
I'm here at the Rx to harvest plays from a select group of handicappers (PENNYWISE being one of them) so I can smash my bookie.
PENNYWISE has helped me tremendously in doing this. That's all I give a damn about.
