Peep follow-ups

Guest · Mar 3, 2003

Looks like there are lots of things flying around and I do not want to be associated with any of it.

To answer some questions:

“Joe, when I start making up quotes about a poster accusing them of talking to childern about buying drugs, let me know.

I will quit my job the same day, I have violated trust.”

So making up quotes regarding children and drugs is a violation of trust. Ok. I strongly agree with that example.

But people are different and so are their standards, if you do not mind, where does that violation of trust end? Ie., what about other kinds of fabricated quotes or other kinds of fabrications?

“While you are here and being chatty Cathy, maybe you could answer my question about if you post as Henhouse? You always seem to let that one slide by, would like you on record one way or another.”

I am never chatty.

What question about Henhouse? This is the first I have seen.

If you had asked last fall when you started this smear campaign, I would have given you the same answer as now, No.

But, you may want to ask Shrink, he has talked to Henhouse…

Shrink even wanted to make him a Moderator…

Guest · Mar 3, 2003

BTW - You owe McIrish $100...

Guest · Mar 3, 2003

Shouldn't this shit be in the RR ?

On second thought fuvk it lets flame eachother right here !

Joe you and Peep should get a room and get this foreplay done with !

--------------------------------

J-Man is just another phucking rat that they'll find face down ass up one of these days

Guest · Mar 3, 2003

To paraphrase Joe's handle ...

"Just when you think Joe has already asked all the dumb shit possible ... he asks an even stupider question "

Guest · Mar 3, 2003

Joe,

no offense but please keep this kind of post in the RR. I will link you both to it here..thanks

Guest · Mar 3, 2003

Why do I owe McIrish $100?

Guest · Mar 3, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Joe:
BTW - You owe McIrish $100...

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Joe, refresh my memory as well. I could use an extra $100.

Honestly I don't ever recall making a wager with Peep.

Guest · Mar 3, 2003

LOL Patrick, I like your position in this more than mine.

Hope we both didn't decide Joe was the "final arbitrator" of the bet too, the one we don't remember making.

If we did, I'll accept an offer of a surrender option now, gladly pay $50 to get out of it.

THERECORDKEEPER2 · Mar 3, 2003

To take a page from your book(when you actually had some say in the matter),STOP THE WHINING!
Boy what a smart move it would have been for SHRINK to hire HENMOUSE to be a moderator(That would rank up there with when you became a moderator as one of the worst decisions by THERX),but then of course I think most of us think you are one in the same anyway!
Joe ,by the way tell me a little bit more about my inaccuracies with my recordkeeping,tell me a little more about my shilling,tell me a little bit more about my whining!
hey LOOK WHO IS STILL AROUND KEEPING RECORDS!
I thought you terminated this experiment in MAY! LOL!!Let me see I will go look for your idiotic post to confirm it:HERE IT IS:

Joe
Just when you think you have all the answers... I change the question

Registered: 07-18-00
Posts: 6591
This "experiment" is hereby terminated for the following reasons:

- Too many inaccuracies.
- Too much whining.
- Too much shilling.
posted 05-16-02 11:55 PM

WHAT A JACKASS!!! SOME THINGS NEVER CHANGE!
PLEASE DON'T BAN ME JOE!! LOL!WHAT A FOOL!

[This message was edited by THERECORDKEEPER2 on 03-03-03 at 08:35 PM.]

[This message was edited by THERECORDKEEPER2 on 03-03-03 at 08:36 PM.]

Guest · Mar 3, 2003

recordkeeper - show some class here. youre acting like a 3 yr old.

THERECORDKEEPER2 · Mar 3, 2003

Maybe so,But this is one guy who has it coming,he was nothing but a scumbag to me when he was a moderator and anyone who has followed me knows exactly what I am talking about!

slugster · Mar 3, 2003

i remember keeper. he treated anyone who did not kiss up to the fraudfather or henfvck like dirt.

we both got banned a couple times by jackass joe.

funny how things change.

slugster

Guest · Mar 3, 2003

I never got banned by Joe, but the dipshit did lock four of my threads in four days for no reason.

Funny how things change.....

Guest · Mar 3, 2003

peep - how can you call joe a 'dipshit?' he was here LONG before you came along...

Guest · Mar 3, 2003

I know you liked him sweetie, I am sorry.

See how much nicer I am now that I know you are a ......?

Guest · Mar 3, 2003

Joe was a very unprofessional Mod. He was bad for the Rx in that capacity IMO.

bigbrother · Mar 3, 2003

as a matter of fact Slugster you are 100% right there as i too was banned by the fuknut (under a different name whick i didn't try to get back when i came back in here) after one of his puppydog posters made physical threats from behind the safety of his keyboard and i offered to take him up on shit, i was banned for starting trouble and accused of being a ghost poster--i only answered the threats willingly i might add i didnt start it. sheesh this shithead accusing others of ghosting--please......

BB

THERECORDKEEPER2 · Mar 3, 2003

I have over 1000 posts under "THERECORDKEEPER2",when this piece of shit was a moderator ,I think the most post I was able to get under one name was around 70 before he banned me,i was banned at least 8 different times and had to keep coming back under new names(which I never hid who I was). he was a moderator who never took the time to see what the cause aof a problem was,instead he tried to throw his weight around and bully people.Once a Jackass ,always a Jackass!
This is one person I have no tolorence or use for,and if not for PEEP(who stuck his neck out,and stood up to that piece of shit for me )who spoke to SHRINK to allow me to post my Monitoring in the RR ,I would not be monitoring today!
Thanks PEEP!

[This message was edited by THERECORDKEEPER2 on 03-04-03 at 03:01 AM.]