5-2 YTD (71%), +2 units
Not a lot that I like this week. I feel like some of the teams aren't as good or as bad as they showed in week one and capping these games based on that first look can be dangerous. I will be more interested in the totals this week.
Stanford @ WF -2.5: Here I think that it would be too easy to grab Stanford. But I am concerned about this game. The early start time has posed problems for teams traveling east. I am concerned about Luck's ability to handle a game like this in the event that WF bottles up the cardinal running game. Something I am sure they will want to do. I am calling this a no-bet for now. We'll see what the total is.
UCLA +8 vs Tennessee: I would think that UT should be able to handle this UCLA squad but 8 points seems like a bit much. I lean to the points but will be more interested in a total again, as I think it may come out a bit inflated given the offensive output that both teams had last week.
Oregon -12 vs Purdue: Here is the first instance in which I don't think a team will be as bad as they looked in week one. That said, I am really having a hard time laying this many points given how terrible the ducks looked offensively. I would think Oregon wins this game and while they could cover easily in some sort of cathartic ass kicking, I hesitate to call for it. No bet.
UW -20.5 vs Idaho: This is an instance where I don't think UW is as good as they looked in week one. However, I like the huskies this week. Just like we predicted here LSU showed up expecting a pillow fight and got a backyard brawl. It was the easiest bet on the board last week and am glad to have taken advantage of it. I continue with the theme that UW is a "play on" team and will most likely do so again next week vs USC. UW -20.5, 1 unit
WSU +2 vs Hawaii: I am going with the "home" team here. WSU will be playing this game in Seattle. While the cougs still got steamrolled last week I saw a team that was playing better. Lopina seemed to manage the game well and I think the cougs would have had a better chance at covering had they stuck with him. Hawaii had a penchant for giving the ball away last week and the cougs for once did not. WSU small. WSU +2, .5 unit
USC -6.5 @ Ohio St. Looks to me like a set up. Ohio St struglged mightily with Navy in what was clearly a look ahead game while USC just took care of business vs a terribly overmatched team. I still maintain that while he won't be relied upon, Barkely will make some key mistakes in this spot and that concerns me laying a TD on the road in a hostile environment. I don't think that USC will be able to rely so much on their running game. I am real tempted to take the home dog. Not yet though. Would like to see where this line settles.
OSU vs UNLV +7: I like OSU but I don't think it is as easy as it appears. Let's not forget how this team performs in early season OOC road games, in a word pathetic. (0-8 since 2003). UNLV spread could give the raw secondary fits. I think the game is closer than the TD but just have the guts to bet it..... yet. What is holding me back is one guy; Jacquizz.
Not a lot that I like this week. I feel like some of the teams aren't as good or as bad as they showed in week one and capping these games based on that first look can be dangerous. I will be more interested in the totals this week.
Stanford @ WF -2.5: Here I think that it would be too easy to grab Stanford. But I am concerned about this game. The early start time has posed problems for teams traveling east. I am concerned about Luck's ability to handle a game like this in the event that WF bottles up the cardinal running game. Something I am sure they will want to do. I am calling this a no-bet for now. We'll see what the total is.
UCLA +8 vs Tennessee: I would think that UT should be able to handle this UCLA squad but 8 points seems like a bit much. I lean to the points but will be more interested in a total again, as I think it may come out a bit inflated given the offensive output that both teams had last week.
Oregon -12 vs Purdue: Here is the first instance in which I don't think a team will be as bad as they looked in week one. That said, I am really having a hard time laying this many points given how terrible the ducks looked offensively. I would think Oregon wins this game and while they could cover easily in some sort of cathartic ass kicking, I hesitate to call for it. No bet.
UW -20.5 vs Idaho: This is an instance where I don't think UW is as good as they looked in week one. However, I like the huskies this week. Just like we predicted here LSU showed up expecting a pillow fight and got a backyard brawl. It was the easiest bet on the board last week and am glad to have taken advantage of it. I continue with the theme that UW is a "play on" team and will most likely do so again next week vs USC. UW -20.5, 1 unit
WSU +2 vs Hawaii: I am going with the "home" team here. WSU will be playing this game in Seattle. While the cougs still got steamrolled last week I saw a team that was playing better. Lopina seemed to manage the game well and I think the cougs would have had a better chance at covering had they stuck with him. Hawaii had a penchant for giving the ball away last week and the cougs for once did not. WSU small. WSU +2, .5 unit
USC -6.5 @ Ohio St. Looks to me like a set up. Ohio St struglged mightily with Navy in what was clearly a look ahead game while USC just took care of business vs a terribly overmatched team. I still maintain that while he won't be relied upon, Barkely will make some key mistakes in this spot and that concerns me laying a TD on the road in a hostile environment. I don't think that USC will be able to rely so much on their running game. I am real tempted to take the home dog. Not yet though. Would like to see where this line settles.
OSU vs UNLV +7: I like OSU but I don't think it is as easy as it appears. Let's not forget how this team performs in early season OOC road games, in a word pathetic. (0-8 since 2003). UNLV spread could give the raw secondary fits. I think the game is closer than the TD but just have the guts to bet it..... yet. What is holding me back is one guy; Jacquizz.