Donnie wasn't siding with anyone - he was just saying the all of 100 people that were present are all fucken idiots - the radical left showed up with bottles and bats looking for a fight - that's being part of the problem - we all understand the white supremacists are worthless - Donnie saying theyre were some fine people on both sides is him tripping over his tongue while being asked a million questions
He gave a Great Deal of Free Ammunition to CNNtifa and MSNB.E.T. to fire at him and other Sane (NON Protesting-Brain Damaged -Attention Whore) Americans. Enabling these Enemies of America (CNNtifa and those they command) to now Outright CALL to Antifa, Black Lives Matter and other Militant Leftist Groups to "Stand Up" and "Do Something" to combat "this" (as they refer to what they are reporting near round-the-clock now as Trump's Support of White Supremacists with Joe Scarborough even referring to The President as a "White Supremacist" and Don Lemon doing his best to make it look like he is fighting to hold back tears....as he "reports" so.....) he did give them some ammunition.
Could be argued though that Trump said stuff that had to be said. These networks absolutely do not broach the subject of Leftist Violence, even framing the tearing down of that statue in Durham the very next day in an almost "heroic" light.
Selectively airing Fight-Footage that does not paint Antifa in a negative light....as aggressors. Which they absolutely were. All that Trump really said.
MSNBET reporting: "Trump says: "Good People among the Torch Bearers" which is a complete misconstrual of what he said, and they fully know this. They lie outright.
Arguable that eventually they'd have evolved to that Call To Action that they are now making.....anyways. May as well get it on bang a gong
if The Sissies, Non-Binary Thats Pats & Cucks wanna respond, to CNNtifa (The MotherShip's) Call: May as well be now woulda habbunned eventually anyways.
- On 7/5/2016 at approximately 6:45 PM Eastern time, someone copied the data that eventually appears on the “NGP VAN” 7zip file (the DNC Emails). This 7zip file was published by a persona named Guccifer 2, two months later on September 13, 2016.
- Due to the estimated speed of transfer (23 MB/s) calculated in this study, it is unlikely that this initial data transfer could have been done remotely over the Internet.
- The initial copying activity was likely done from a computer system that had direct access to the data. By “direct access” we mean that the individual who was collecting the data either had physical access to the computer where the data was stored, or the data was copied over a local high speed network (LAN).
- They may have copied a much larger collection of data than the data present in the NGP VAN 7zip. This larger collection of data may have been as large as 19 GB. In that scenario the NGP VAN 7zip file represents only 1/10th of the total amount of material taken.
- This initial copying activity was done on a system where Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) settings were in force. Most likely, the computer used to initially copy the data was located somewhere on the East Coast.
- The data was likely initially copied to a computer running Linux, because the file last modified times all reflect the apparent time of the copy and this is a characteristic of the the Linux ‘cp’ command (using default options).
- A Linux OS may have been booted from a USB flash drive and the data may have been copied back to the same flash drive, which will likely have been formatted with the Linux (ext4) file system.
- On September 1, 2016, two months after copying the initial large collection of (alleged) DNC related content (the so-called NGP/VAN data), a subset was transferred to working directories on a system running Windows. The .rar files included in the final 7zip file were built from those working directories.
- The computer system where the working directories were built had Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) settings in force. Most likely, this system was located somewhere on the East Coast.
- The .rar files and plain files that eventually end up in the “NGP VAN” 7zip file disclosed by Guccifer 2.0 on 9/13/2016 were likely first copied to a USB flash drive, which served as the source data for the final 7zip file. There is no information to determine when or where the final 7zip file was built.
Guccifer 2.0 (That DNC "Hack") (By Some Russians lol) MetaData Analysis:
https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/
<iframe allowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true" style="height: 500px; width: 540px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;" class="imgur-embed-iframe-pub imgur-embed-iframe-pub-NxEO2Ux-true-540" scrolling="no" src="http://imgur.com/NxEO2Ux/embed?ref=about%3Ablank&w=540" id="imgur-embed-iframe-pub-NxEO2Ux"></iframe><script async="" src="//s.imgur.com/min/embed.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
We've seen deliberately placed "Russian Fingerprints",
efforts to forge perceived association to Wikileaks,
DNC breach claims discredited,
How Guccifer 2.0 Used "Trump Opposition Research" like it was an identity card the day after it was cited by Shawn Henry in a Washington Post article,
noted how he could only ever "hack" the DNC,
lacked syntactical traits of a Russian speaking English
and recently - has been shown as most likely to have accessed some of his files locally, probably from the DNC network (within the Eastern Time zone).
The list of "Additional Articles" are articles unique to this site. These provide further information showing how, why, where and when questionable APT28/29 attributions to Guccifer 2.0 occurred (all were ultimately tenuous) as well as various other relevant topics.
Update - August 14th, 2017
by ADAM CARTER
Click on Broom Hillary's Nose to read Adam's Report on The DNC Hack and "Guccifer 2.0"
<header class="container u-maxWidth740">DNC Makes Unbelievably Feeble Response To Latest Russiagate Debunking Evidence
The US power establishment’s confrontation with Russia is too important to be left to the whims of facts and evidence.
The sprawling plutocratic power structure that is loosely centralized in the United States has been on a collision course with both Russia and China for a long while now and it needs to move its chess pieces into place.
This conflict is about nothing other than power, money and resources, and you can’t persuade 320 million heavily-armed Americans to consent to a potentially world-ending conflict by telling them it’s about making plutocrats richer and more powerful.
So they lie.
Among the many, many lies that America’s unelected power establishment advances on a daily basis, they are saying that the heightened tensions with the world’s only other nuclear superpower are about protecting America’s democracy.
The allied plutocrats who own America’s elected officials and the rest of the secretive second government which manipulates US and international affairs have been hard at work lulling Americans back into the illusion that they live in a democracy with one hand while manufacturing support for military escalations with the other.
Though it’s unclear how much its officials know, the Democratic National Committee has played an important, willing role in all this.
They disgraced themselves when they were caught rigging the party primary whose fairness they were singularly responsible for ensuring, possibly while involved in some highly illegal activities, so they’ve got every motive imaginable to try and shift the blame someplace else.
Collaborating with the intelligence community to lie to the American people about Russia is a perfect way to do that.
Perfectly Sensible then that when the left-leaning outlet The Nation brought the explosive findings of the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity into the public spotlight with a lucid and thorough article, the DNC would want to push back on it.
The findings both decimate the Russian hacking narrative and possibly implicate the DNC in colluding to frame Russia for what was almost certainly an insider leak, so some statement from the Committee was to be expected.
I don’t think, though, that anybody expected The DNC's response to be quite so empty, vapid, ButtHurt and limp-dicked as the letter they ended up sending to The Nation’s editors:
<figure name="962f" id="962f" class="graf graf--figure graf-after--p"></figure><figure name="962f" id="962f" class="graf graf--figure graf-after--p">
The US intelligence community has an extensive history of lying to the American people to advance its own agendas. This is not a conspiracy theory, this is a well-documented fact, and anyone who says otherwise is either ignorant or dishonest. And yet of the 54 words in the DNC’s response to The Nation, four of them reference “conspiracy theory”.
It reminds me of former acting DNC Chairwoman Donna Brazile repeating the phrase “we have ample evidence” for the Russian hacking no less than three times back-to-back like a gibbering lunatic, as though saying something more than once in quick succession compels the listener to accept it as truth.
Let me give that a try, just in case it works:
It is the US intelligence community’s job to lie to you.
It is the US intelligence community’s job to lie to you.
It is the US intelligence community’s job to lie to you.
<figure name="7342" id="7342" class="graf graf--figure graf--iframe graf-after--h3"></figure><figure name="7342" id="7342" class="graf graf--figure graf--iframe graf-after--h3"></figure>We clear on that? Nobody gets to bully us into accepting the US intelligence community’s assertions as true, least of all the Committee that just got done violating its own Charter and actively sabotaging the will of the American people. Nobody gets to tell us that anyone who questions the same intelligence community who lied to us about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq is a conspiracy theorist or a Trump supporter. Nobody gets to shame us for disbelieving known liars and manipulators. That is not a thing.
Never let anyone shout you down for expressing healthy skepticism about the US intelligence community’s claims. They forever forfeited their right to do that when they deceived the entire world into allowing the unforgivable Iraq invasion which slaughtered a million human beings and plunged the region into chaos, and they are now entitled to nothing other than a planet-sized grain of salt being placed atop everything they try to serve us.
The “17 intelligence agencies agree” narrative once universally accepted as unquestionable Russiagate dogma became three agencies plus the ODNI, which turned out to actually be a couple dozen loyalists hand-selected by known Russophobic racist James Clapper, and now the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity have released some extremely damning evidence that absolutely must be addressed by the establishment which has been advancing the official Russia narrative.
<figure name="6340" id="6340" class="graf graf--figure graf--iframe graf-after--mixtapeEmbed"></figure><figure name="6340" id="6340" class="graf graf--figure graf--iframe graf-after--mixtapeEmbed"></figure>
Caitlin Johnstone is a 100 percent reader-funded journalist so if you enjoyed this, please consider helping her out by sharing it around, liking her on Facebook, following here on Twitter, or throwing some money into her hat on Patreon.
https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/...st-russiagate-debunking-evidence-8a0cde8d29ae
</figure></header>
The US power establishment’s confrontation with Russia is too important to be left to the whims of facts and evidence.
The sprawling plutocratic power structure that is loosely centralized in the United States has been on a collision course with both Russia and China for a long while now and it needs to move its chess pieces into place.
This conflict is about nothing other than power, money and resources, and you can’t persuade 320 million heavily-armed Americans to consent to a potentially world-ending conflict by telling them it’s about making plutocrats richer and more powerful.
So they lie.
Among the many, many lies that America’s unelected power establishment advances on a daily basis, they are saying that the heightened tensions with the world’s only other nuclear superpower are about protecting America’s democracy.
The allied plutocrats who own America’s elected officials and the rest of the secretive second government which manipulates US and international affairs have been hard at work lulling Americans back into the illusion that they live in a democracy with one hand while manufacturing support for military escalations with the other.
Though it’s unclear how much its officials know, the Democratic National Committee has played an important, willing role in all this.
They disgraced themselves when they were caught rigging the party primary whose fairness they were singularly responsible for ensuring, possibly while involved in some highly illegal activities, so they’ve got every motive imaginable to try and shift the blame someplace else.
Collaborating with the intelligence community to lie to the American people about Russia is a perfect way to do that.
Perfectly Sensible then that when the left-leaning outlet The Nation brought the explosive findings of the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity into the public spotlight with a lucid and thorough article, the DNC would want to push back on it.
The findings both decimate the Russian hacking narrative and possibly implicate the DNC in colluding to frame Russia for what was almost certainly an insider leak, so some statement from the Committee was to be expected.
I don’t think, though, that anybody expected The DNC's response to be quite so empty, vapid, ButtHurt and limp-dicked as the letter they ended up sending to The Nation’s editors:
<figure name="962f" id="962f" class="graf graf--figure graf-after--p"></figure><figure name="962f" id="962f" class="graf graf--figure graf-after--p">
The US intelligence community has an extensive history of lying to the American people to advance its own agendas. This is not a conspiracy theory, this is a well-documented fact, and anyone who says otherwise is either ignorant or dishonest. And yet of the 54 words in the DNC’s response to The Nation, four of them reference “conspiracy theory”.
It reminds me of former acting DNC Chairwoman Donna Brazile repeating the phrase “we have ample evidence” for the Russian hacking no less than three times back-to-back like a gibbering lunatic, as though saying something more than once in quick succession compels the listener to accept it as truth.
Let me give that a try, just in case it works:
It is the US intelligence community’s job to lie to you.
It is the US intelligence community’s job to lie to you.
It is the US intelligence community’s job to lie to you.
<figure name="7342" id="7342" class="graf graf--figure graf--iframe graf-after--h3"></figure><figure name="7342" id="7342" class="graf graf--figure graf--iframe graf-after--h3"></figure>We clear on that? Nobody gets to bully us into accepting the US intelligence community’s assertions as true, least of all the Committee that just got done violating its own Charter and actively sabotaging the will of the American people. Nobody gets to tell us that anyone who questions the same intelligence community who lied to us about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq is a conspiracy theorist or a Trump supporter. Nobody gets to shame us for disbelieving known liars and manipulators. That is not a thing.
Never let anyone shout you down for expressing healthy skepticism about the US intelligence community’s claims. They forever forfeited their right to do that when they deceived the entire world into allowing the unforgivable Iraq invasion which slaughtered a million human beings and plunged the region into chaos, and they are now entitled to nothing other than a planet-sized grain of salt being placed atop everything they try to serve us.
The “17 intelligence agencies agree” narrative once universally accepted as unquestionable Russiagate dogma became three agencies plus the ODNI, which turned out to actually be a couple dozen loyalists hand-selected by known Russophobic racist James Clapper, and now the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity have released some extremely damning evidence that absolutely must be addressed by the establishment which has been advancing the official Russia narrative.
<figure name="6340" id="6340" class="graf graf--figure graf--iframe graf-after--mixtapeEmbed"></figure><figure name="6340" id="6340" class="graf graf--figure graf--iframe graf-after--mixtapeEmbed"></figure>
Keep pushing.
— — —
Caitlin Johnstone is a 100 percent reader-funded journalist so if you enjoyed this, please consider helping her out by sharing it around, liking her on Facebook, following here on Twitter, or throwing some money into her hat on Patreon.
https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/...st-russiagate-debunking-evidence-8a0cde8d29ae
</figure></header>
Discrimination in most forms aggravates the sensitivity of certain groups, but discrimination
against what is the truth is rare or should be, but you managed it congratulations.
Some politically correct liberals may consider Confederate soldiers as traitors but it is obvious
the U.S. government does not. The government against which he fought has honored Robert E. Lee
on at least five postage stamps. Stonewall Jackson has also been memorialized on US stamps.
'It’s a bit of an anecdote, but the fact the US Army gave "fightin Joe' Wheeler a position of pretty high
command suggests the bad blood had begun to dissipate. Wikipedia also lists Fitzhugh Lee &
Matthew Butler as former Confederate major-generals who commanded troops in the Spanish-American war.
After the war, 15 Confederate Officers served as U.S. ambassadors or ministers to foreign countries'
Even after entering the US army as a General fighting Spain, Joe remained true to his roots:
'Joseph Wheeler, a Confederate cavalry general in the Civil War, went on to serve as a major-general
during the Spanish-American war and forgetting himself in the heat of a battle yelled "Let's go, boys!
We've got the damn Yankees on the run again!".
Well then it sounds like your front lawn should have at least a handful of these Heroes statuary on display.
I read this morning the City of Baltimore - among others - has a truckload of discarded vintage 1920-something cheap metal CSA-friendly statues for sale.........Cheap........Go for it....And then post pics here at the Rxforum for your fellow CSA fan club members to enjoy!
Why don't You Hobo for a spell? Get Out There 'n Ride The Rails? Cuz ain't nair a man nor woman up in here "Fans of CSA" there are Fans of Truth here 'n Fans of not Cowtowing to Cowards Fans of Not Bowing to The Power (and The Powerless...who wanna Play 'Captain'), Fans of not Surrendering Our History cuz History Teaches: Bad stuff has followed after, for folks who allowed that.
You're exactly like them Fake News QuoteMiners 'n MisQuoters CNNtifa, exactly like them. You should hop a Boxcar to Atlanta and Write for them.
Lanquel likes to talk like he's smart and use big words and fancy sentences, but when confronted with actual FACTS that are contrary to his bullshit blather he either tucks tail and runs or responds with smartass jokes in an attempt to belittle whoever is calling him out.
Nothing to see here.
Some of you posters need a brush up on your Civil War history. According to Lincoln, the Civil War was not based on slavery. It came about after the Confederacy succeeded from the Union which was legal according to the Constitution. Almost all Confederate soldiers and generals were fighting for their states and were actually pardoned following the war. This is because the Union knew the Confederate actions weren't treasonous.
The statues coming down are coming down for the wrong reasons based on opinions of people who haven't cracked a history book.
The statues coming down are coming down for the wrong reasons based on opinions of people who haven't cracked a history book.
Here Here! +1Million, or whatever. Its not easy to detail concisely, without yet another 4000 word post (unless one is a Civil War & US History Expert) but you're totally right. Very few people understand what "The Civil War was about" and what it was Less About. I won't be claiming to understand it all myself, no way but I think Tariffs were a Large part of what led to it...The Southern states were prosperous & the North was....less so. I Believe that a "Point of contention" was Northern Industry having to compete with Southern Industry when South had Slave Labor so "Unfair Advantage" so: TARIFFS of IIRC 35% or maybe even more on Exported Southern Goods were sought, by The North....
Boiled Down another "Taxation Without Representation" type deal/Power to Govern themselves situation for The South.....motivated the conflict.....Similar to the exact motivations behind The Founding Father's Exodus out of England, The Revolutionary War....that Boston Tea Party.
There do seem to be similarities, between what led to both conflicts.
I believe that Lincoln's reason for (eventually) desiring Freedom for Southern Slaves was in an expectation that they would TURN on their Southern Masters and effectively become Proxy Fighters for The North but that did not happen.
If I am not mistaken Freedom for the Southern slaves was offered PRIMARILY in hopes they'd fight against the North. And bring about the end of an absolutely horrific war, as soon as possible.
"I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever
have been, in favor of bringing about in
any way the social and political equality
of the white and black races;
that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor
of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor
of qualifying them to hold office, nor to
intermarry with white people; and I will say,
in addition to this, that there is a physical
difference between the white and black races
which I believe will forever forbid the two races
living together on terms of social and political
equality. And in as much as they cannot so live,
while they do remain together there must be
the position of superior and inferior, and I as
much as any other man am in favor of having
the superior position assigned to the white race."
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fourth Debate, Charleston, Sept 18, 1858
"I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution.
The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was."
If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them.
If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them.
My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery.
If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that.
What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views."
-- Abraham Lincoln, Letter to Horace Greeley, Washington, August 22, 1862
On The South & Slavery: Its my understanding that Immigration had, by the time of the Civil War, created an atmosphere wherein Sharecropping would possibly present a better alternative for a very LARGE percent of Southerners for Cheap labor than Slave Owning bcuz Sharecroppers would only have to have been given part of the crop. Potentially a better route to take than employing slaves so some do make an argument that Slavery may have been "on its way out" to a large extent within The South anyways.
My Understanding ^^^^, for what thats worth that Yes, Slavery was far from "What The Civil War was mainly About", others will know more.
The Statues coming down are not about anything other than "Power", an attempt to assert that. Control. An attempt to gain this.
IMO anyways.
This Video is fairly interesting, for the "compelling-ness" of what is stated within it: The Facts Proclaimed.
"Proclaimed"...could be more "Fake News" of course, thats always possible nowadays of course but it seems to make sense.
Its not all Silent all the way through, just during the first few Intro Frames and its relatively short. And to the point. A rarity in YouTube Videos.
"Proclaimed"...could be more "Fake News" of course, thats always possible nowadays of course but it seems to make sense.
Its not all Silent all the way through, just during the first few Intro Frames and its relatively short. And to the point. A rarity in YouTube Videos.
