Thx Willye.
From your thread:
Something i did not know and made a huge mistake played a pick 3 on one of the sponsors websites well i always understood all books have max payouts which is fine no problem with that, long story short i hit a pick 3 at the track problem was i had the only winning ticket the pool was small so i would of won 2,600 the max payout at the sponsor site was 1500 which would of sucked but i knew the rules going in what i didnt know was now that i had the only winning ticket i got paid 2 out of 3, a truly bad beat i called the sponsor they said theres nothing they can do about it, which i think is a joke but anyway a warning for anyone who plays ponies online
and your follow up explanation, which is in this thread:
i talked to the customer service manager who will not budge on the subject, with a reason that just is not acceptable, really dont understand why the book wants to risk this much bad publicity over 1500, like i stated to her i know when i play there is a max payout which is clearly stated in the rules that is fine it does not state what happens if i have the only winning ticket and the track pays 2 out of 3, my logic is the save their self with the max payout so the total bet into it was roughly 3200, which i would of had the only winning ticket and got paid roughly 25-2700 but woth there being a max payout of 1500/1 in a pick 3 wager i only get that which is fine but to tell me im only getting paid 2 out of 3 which is 46.10 when i had the winning ticket and hit all 3 legs thats a problem
To be honest, I'm not entirely clear on the situation. And I apologize as I may be a little slow on horse wagering. My estimation of 5dimes based on my own personal experience is that most everything is black and white. They play it straight and fair. They have their rules. Play by the rules and keep it clean, and it's all good. This has been my experience when things have come up from any misunderstandings from either side.
Personally, I recognize that offshore books are not your local churches, so my preference is to keep it as simple as possible and stay away from situations/wagers/whatever where there can be dubious outcomes or grey areas. This is why I like black and white wagers pegged to old, firm rules. I can't be swindled on a simple wager unless the book itself is doing some shady shit. And in that case, I wouldn't take my action to such a book in the first place.
Thus if I win, I win. And I have every right to get every penny. There is no way around it unless I'm getting swindled. If I lose, I lose. And so be it, but I got a fair shake.
I have not read of a simple case where John Doe runs his balance up to 20k from a $500 deposit and 5dimes sends the guy packing and keeps his money.
When I read complaints it usually of the nature of grey areas, dubious situations and etc. Details left out and guys telling the clerks they'll kill the clerks children with a hammer or something ridiculous like that.