OJ Guilty or Innocent?

[noidae555]

Howdy! first time poster in the house!

Thought I'd start out with a bang!

fwiw I think he did it

Happy 4th y'all!

Go UCSC Banana Slugs!

 

[HamGlaze]

Without a doubt he was guilty of kidnapping and robbery charges at Palace Station here in Vegas.


Welcome to the Rx.

 

[RenoChazz]

Long time lurker?

 

[KingEleven]

Welcome. Our system said he was innocent...20 years ago!

 

[Enfuego]

Who's ghost are you?

 

[PatsFan1283]

Without a doubt he was guilty of kidnapping and robbery charges at Palace Station here in Vegas.


Welcome to the Rx.

My favorite part of that is how his rag-tag crew that he assembled saw the Pete Rose and Joe Montana stuff and said "Ehh, let's take that too"

 

[vitterd]

Obvious guilty. A murderer that should have been put to death.

 

[Willie99]

as guilty as a man ever was

never seen more compelling and overwhelming evidence

the verdict was "racist"

 

[Mobdeeper7239]

lol starting off with bang. I guess he's 1-0 guys. LOL

 

[GoSooners]

Conspiracy theorists in 3...2...1

 

[DocJS]

Welcome. Our system said he was innocent...20 years ago!

No... the system found him "not guilty"...not the same thing.

 

[KingEleven]

No... the system found him "not guilty"...not the same thing.

wrong. Innocent until proven guilty. Was never proven guilty, hence he retains his innocence.

 

[Redagger029]

Long time lurker?

VPN included.

 

[StevieRay]

It's been covered already Hit search

 

[Enfuego]

wrong. Innocent until proven guilty. Was never proven guilty, hence he retains his innocence.

He was found guilty in civil court.

 

[KingEleven]

He was found guilty in civil court.

EnFuego, you are incorrect also. He was held liable in civil court. Liable IS NOT the same thing as guilty.

 

[PatsFan1283]

If you watch the 30 for 30, he seems like he took the civil suit like it was complete BS. He was laughing when they were cross examining him.

Obviously he knew he wasn't paying out shit either way and already won the case that mattered.

 

[RenoChazz]

EnFuego, you are incorrect also. He was held liable in civil court. Liable IS NOT the same thing as guilty.

Would you agree that our system didn't find him innocent, but not guilty?

 

[KingEleven]

If you watch the 30 for 30, he seems like he took the civil suit like it was complete BS. He was laughing when they were cross examining him.

Obviously he knew he wasn't paying out shit either way and already won the case that mattered.

winning judgments is one thing! receiving payments is another!

 

[KingEleven]

Would you agree that our system didn't find him innocent, but not guilty?

No. Our LAW is Innocent until proven guilty and since he wasn't found guilty, makes him innocent by definition. (of course I think the guy did it, but that is not what we are arguing here) Civil court is way different, you do not have to prove beyond shadow of a doubt.