Might be. He mentions that they are targeting Christians and encroaching on an area with Americans. So that's why he's approving the air strikes. And another group of non-Muslim religious people are stuck on a mountain with nothing and ISIS coming for them. Makes sense why he's doing the air strikes. I wish he'd do more and obliterate anything ISIS touches.
The same way we, and the world, are paying for all of Bush's mistakes. An unsafer World, more terrorists being created that will hate America for getting involved in their region's affairs. More resources being allocated to the military. Vicious, never ending cycle that I hoped Obama would be smart enough to avoid, but he isn't. He's a fool, and a warmonger, who has been itching to get in a War. Russia saved his ass from getting involved in Syria.
ISIS is the result of Bush's Policy failures in destabilizing the region. I am all for their destruction, by a World Coalition, led by Arab forces, with the US as a contributing member of such a coalition, doing it,. The US dropping a few bombs unilaterally wont do shit, except create the Next ISIS, and swell the ranks of the current ISIS.
Bush did not "destabilize" anything, you liar. "The region" was not stable.
Further, here is how the President you voted for 2 times described Iraq 2 years ago:
we're leaving behind a sovereign, stable and self reliant Iraq with a representative government that was elected by its people. We're building a new partnership between our nations and we are ending a war not with a final battle but with a final march toward home. This is an extraordinary achievement
ISIS marching through Iraq is a direct result of Obama's policy choices.
Your comments on this topic are pathetic.
Im with Obama on this, something has to be done.
Just don't put anyone on the ground. Lots of ways to stop them, and give the people who are there defnding their own country a fighting chance, without putting our own boots on the ground.
Kudos to Obama for standing up and doing something.
Just don't put anyone on the ground. Lots of ways to stop them, and give the people who are there defnding their own country a fighting chance, without putting our own boots on the ground.
Kudos to Obama for standing up and doing something.
I would not have voted for Obama against Huntsman, nor against Ron Paul. But the losers the R's put up against him, definitely, and if they put up a similar clown in 2016, I would vote for him again. Since he ain't running in 2016, and Hillary is, I either vote R, if they put up someone somewhat sane I could live with(Rand, Carson, Christie), or 3rd party, if they don't.
Yeah that canard he always posts is annoying. But what's even more reprehensible is that he'd prefer us to do nothing while this mass slaughter is committed. Yet he still doesn't comprehend that when left alone jihadi groups always grow larger in numbers, geography, and intent. What we have here is not even a group anymore, but an actual terrorist state run by and for terrorists with an army of evil that stretches 600 miles. I'd rather fight them there than fight them here.
When it comes to moonbat crazy this is how far leftists think. Moveon.org is for the food drops to the stranded captives on the mountain, but against the air strikes on ISIS. How nice that moveon trumpets our forces providing a last meal to the condemned before they're slaughtered!
Edited to add another Guesserism - "Killing terrorists creates more terrorists."
NO, IT DOES NOT! Ideology creates terrorists. And a sick one it is. Decimate these Fuckers now.
