Obama's New America: 86 million full time workers sustain 148 million benefit takers

Search

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,421
Tokens
86M Full-Time Private-Sector Workers Sustain 148M Benefit Takers

April 16, 2014 - 5:04 AM

3517.jpg

By Terence P. Jeffrey

Subscribe to Terence P. Jeffrey RSS

Buried deep on the website of the U.S. Census Bureau is a number every American citizen, and especially those entrusted with public office, should know. It is 86,429,000.

That is the number of Americans who in 2012 got up every morning and went to work — in the private sector — and did it week after week after week.

These are the people who built America, and these are the people who can sustain it as a free country. The liberal media has not made them famous like the polar bear, but they are truly a threatened species.

It is not a rancher with a few hundred head of cattle that is attacking their habitat, nor an energy company developing a fossil fuel. It is big government and its primary weapon — an ever-expanding welfare state.

First, let's look at the basic taxonomy of the full-time, year-round American worker.

In 2012, according to the Census Bureau, approximately 103,087,000 people worked full-time, year-round in the United States. "A full-time, year-round worker is a person who worked 35 or more hours per week (full time) and 50 or more weeks during the previous calendar year (year round)," said the Census Bureau. "For school personnel, summer vacation is counted as weeks worked if they are scheduled to return to their job in the fall."

Of the 103,087,000 full-time, year-round workers, 16,606,000 worked for the government. That included 12,597,000 who worked for state and local government and 4,009,000 who worked for the federal government.

The 86,429,000 Americans who worked full-time, year-round in the private sector, included 77,392,000 employed as wage and salary workers for private-sector enterprises and 9,037,000 who worked for themselves. (There were also approximately 52,000 who worked full-time, year-round without pay in a family enterprise.)

At first glance, 86,429,000 might seem like a healthy population of full-time private-sector workers. But then you need to look at what they are up against.

The Census Bureau also estimates the size of the benefit-receiving population.

This population, too, falls into two broad categories. The first includes those who receive benefits for public services they performed or in exchange for payroll taxes they dutifully paid their entire working lives. Among these, for example, are those receiving veteran's benefits, those on unemployment and those getting Medicare and Social Security.

The second category includes those who get "means-tested" government benefits — or welfare. These include, for example, those who get Medicaid, food stamps, Supplemental Security Income, public housing, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and Women, Infants Children.

Let's examine this second category first, which the Census Bureau reports as "anyone residing in a household in which one or more people received benefits from the program."

In the last quarter of 2011, according to the Census Bureau, approximately 82,457,000 people lived in households where one or more people were on Medicaid. 49,073,000 lived in households were someone got food stamps. 23,228,000 lived in households where one or more got WIC. 20,223,000 lived in households where one or more got SSI. 13,433,000 lived in public or government-subsidized housing.

Of course, it stands to reason that some people lived in households that received more than one welfare benefit at a time. To account for this, the Census Bureau published a neat composite statistic: There were 108,592,000 people in the fourth quarter of 2011 who lived in a household that included people on "one or more means-tested program."

Those 108,592,000 outnumbered the 86,429,000 full-time private-sector workers who inhabited the United States in 2012 by almost 1.3 to 1.

This brings us to the first category of benefit receivers. There were 49,901,000 people receiving Social Security in the fourth quarter of 2011, and 46,440,000 receiving Medicare. There were also 5,098,000 getting unemployment compensation.

And there were also, 3,178,000 veterans receiving benefits and 34,000 veterans getting educational assistance.

All told, including both the welfare recipients and the non-welfare beneficiaries, there were 151,014,000 who "received benefits from one or more programs" in the fourth quarter of 2011. Subtract the 3,212,000 veterans, who served their country in the most profound way possible, and that leaves 147,802,000 non-veteran benefit takers.

The 147,802,000 non-veteran benefit takers outnumbered the 86,429,000 full-time private sector workers 1.7 to 1.

How much more can the 86,429,000 endure?

As more baby boomers retire, and as Obamacare comes fully online — with its expanded Medicaid rolls and federally subsidized health insurance for anyone earning less than 400 percent of the poverty level — the number of takers will inevitably expand. And the number of full-time private-sector workers might also contract.

Eventually, there will be too few carrying too many, and America will break.


The business and economic reporting of CNSNews.com is funded in part with a gift made in memory of Dr. Keith C. Wold.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
40,121
Tokens
& the top 3% wage earners pay 30% of Federal income taxes....The bottom 50% pay no taxes at all....Our debt is 17 trillion with a T ?...Time to reign in spending in all sectors...
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
& the top 3% wage earners pay 30% of Federal income taxes....The bottom 50% pay no taxes at all....Our debt is 17 trillion with a T ?...Time to reign in spending in all sectors...

How about the top 10% paying 70% of federal income taxes. The truth is I don't mind being a pulling the cart(the rich can, should and will pay more), it's the demonizing of the wealthy that really pisses me off.
 

Defender of the Faith
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
5,680
Tokens
How about the top 10% paying 70% of federal income taxes. The truth is I don't mind being a pulling the cart(the rich can, should and will pay more), it's the demonizing of the wealthy that really pisses me off.

How about this thread demonizing the non-wealthy? You OK with that?
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
How about this thread demonizing the non-wealthy? You OK with that?

I don't see people demonizing the "non-wealthy", I see people concerned that eventually there will be too many people in the cart and not enough cart pullers. However, to your point, I'm not okay with demonizing the "non-wealthy". As far as the "non-wealthy" are concerned I am of the opinion most work or want to work but can't (hence why i said, The truth is I don't mind pulling the cart(the rich can, should and will pay more). Did you miss that or choose to ignore it? I would guess there is a very small percentage of Americans that would rather collect a welfare check than work.
 

Defender of the Faith
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
5,680
Tokens
The "people in the cart" drive the economy. They spend every single dollar they collect in benefits. With every Happy Meal, pack of diapers, and gallon of gas they buy, the top 1% makes a profit and stashes away a little more money that will never circulate again.

Without this monthly economic stimulus of "non-wealthy" spending, the economy would crater. Even Wal-Mart put our a prospectus saying a cut in food stamps would hurt their bottom line; there was a thread on it not too long ago.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
The "people in the cart" drive the economy. They spend every single dollar they collect in benefits. With every Happy Meal, pack of diapers, and gallon of gas they buy, the top 1% makes a profit and stashes away a little more money that will never circulate again.

Without this monthly economic stimulus of "non-wealthy" spending, the economy would crater. Even Wal-Mart put our a prospectus saying a cut in food stamps would hurt their bottom line; there was a thread on it not too long ago.

Where did I ever say the people in the cart don't drive the economy? Although, I would argue the middle class drives the economy. You've taken my comment about being happy to pull the cart but being offended by demonizing the 1% and completely bastardized it to turn the argument into some commentary on food stamps and welfare. You're arguing with yourself.
 

Defender of the Faith
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
5,680
Tokens
Where did I ever say the people in the cart don't drive the economy? Although, I would argue the middle class drives the economy. You've taken my comment about being happy to pull the cart but being offended by demonizing the 1% and completely bastardized it to turn the argument into some commentary on food stamps and welfare. You're arguing with yourself.

I'm not arguing with you or anybody. I think it is obvious the OP wants to demonize the poor and pretend the POTUS is somehow intentionally bring about the end of the country by extending benefits to those who need them.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
I'm not arguing with you or anybody. I think it is obvious the OP wants to demonize the poor and pretend the POTUS is somehow intentionally bring about the end of the country by extending benefits to those who need them.

Then you should have started by responding to his comments, not mine. I don't pretend to know how he feels about the poor. That's his issue, not mine.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
The "people in the cart" drive the economy. They spend every single dollar they collect in benefits. With every Happy Meal, pack of diapers, and gallon of gas they buy, the top 1% makes a profit and stashes away a little more money that will never circulate again.

Without this monthly economic stimulus of "non-wealthy" spending, the economy would crater. Even Wal-Mart put our a prospectus saying a cut in food stamps would hurt their bottom line; there was a thread on it not too long ago.

Well that certainly explains why the economy is booming.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,421
Tokens
JohnnyMac believes people IN the cart drive the economy - the Great Society creates wealth and prosperity!

It is one fallacy built on top of another. Democrats will say and do anything to prop up their immoral, decrepit unsustainable political system they have built over the last 50 or so years.

Pelosi: Extending Unemployment 'One of Best Ways to Grow the Economy'

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/pelosi-extending-unemployment-one-best-ways-grow-economy

Here we go again - printing and spending money creates wealth! face)(*^%
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
The "people in the cart" drive the economy. They spend every single dollar they collect in benefits. With every Happy Meal, pack of diapers, and gallon of gas they buy, the top 1% makes a profit and stashes away a little more money that will never circulate again.

Without this monthly economic stimulus of "non-wealthy" spending, the economy would crater. Even Wal-Mart put our a prospectus saying a cut in food stamps would hurt their bottom line; there was a thread on it not too long ago.

To say you are comically, and embarrassingly, ignorant of economics is a massive understatement.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
The "people in the cart" drive the economy.

No they don't. And the fact that you don't understand that in order to get a poor person a $1 three dollars needs to be sucked out of the economy is quite funny.

You should stick with "You're demonizing the poor"

It was much better, since you have no understanding of economics.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
No they don't. And the fact that you don't understand that in order to get a poor person a $1 three dollars needs to be sucked out of the economy is quite funny.

You should stick with "You're demonizing the poor"

It was much better, since you have no understanding of economics.

If it's sucked out of the economy where does it go? In to a black hole?
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,421
Tokens
Hey Acebb,

Did you know if I turn on the filter in my pool and begin recirculating the water, I'm actually INCREASING THE WATER CONTENT in my pool?

No, really. I was doing some reading and "smart people" call this the "velocity of water theory"...and it works! It absolutely works!

It's amazing!

PELOSI_LIBERALISM_300x300_xlarge.jpeg
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,947
Messages
13,575,516
Members
100,887
Latest member
yalkastazi
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com