Obamacare Accounting - really

Search

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
[h=2]Obamacare Co-Ops Used Accounting Gimmick Approved by Feds[/h]Failed co-ops reported net assets despite losing millions
SHARE
TWEET
EMAIL

AP


BY: Elizabeth Harrington
March 1, 2016 5:00 am


Co-ops created under Obamacare reported net assets despite losing millions because they used an accounting trick approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Tax filings for 18 co-ops, including nine that collapsed in 2015, also revealed that co-op CEOs were paid handsomely before many had to shut down.
In July 2015, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services amended its agreement with co-ops, allowing them to list $2.4 billion in loans they received from taxpayers as assets.
“This notice is to inform you that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will now allow co-ops to request that surplus notes be applied to Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (co-op) Program start-up loans,” the agency said in a notice to co-op project officers. “Applying surplus notes to the startup loans will enable co-op borrowers to record those loans as assets in financial filings with regulators.”
Citizens Against Government Waste, a nonprofit that seeks to eliminate inefficiency in government, said the notice permitted Obamacare co-ops to use fuzzy math to mask their true financial situation.
“Taxpayers expect to hear the truth about Obamacare’s co-ops,” Curtis Kalin, the group’s spokesman, said. “It is unconscionable that CMS attempted to obscure the financial disaster the co-ops have become through gimmicks and loopholes.
“The fact that failed co-op CEOs received bonuses is ethical salt in a festering fiscal wound,” he said.
Though 21 of 23 co-ops lost money in 2014, most listed net gains on their 990 forms filed with the IRS. Additionally, CEOs were paid well over six figures, including the Health Republic Insurance of New York, which paid its president and CEO $427,000.
That co-op closed last fall and is now under investigation for its finances.
The nine co-ops that collapsed in 2015 paid their CEOs a combined $2.8 million.
New Mexico Health Connections listed net assets of $23.2 million in 2014, though it lost $2.97 million the same year. Every employee of the co-op made over six figures, including CEO Martin Hickey who made $262,874.
The New Mexico co-op is still operating, though it announced last year it was dropping preferred provider plans, limiting individuals who purchase insurance through the co-op to the more restrictive health maintenance organization plans, or HMOs.
Co-ops in Kentucky, Louisiana, New York, Tennessee, Utah, and Oregon listed net assets despite suffering multi-million dollar losses in 2014. All have since folded.
For instance, Kentucky Health Cooperative lost $50.4 million, but reported net assets of $65.2 million. The co-op shut down in October. “In plainest language, things have come up short of where they need to be,” the interim CEO said at the time.
Louisiana Health Cooperative lost $20.8 million, but listed net assets of $14.1 million and paid its CEO $307,000.
The co-op announced it would end all policies by 2016. Its founders were able to rake in $3.6 million in contracts from the co-op in 2013, the Times-Picayune reported.
Health Republic Insurance of New York listed $77.5 million in losses, but also $63.7 million in net assets. CEO Debra Friedman was the highest paid official at a failed Obamacare co-op, earning $427,632 in 2014. The co-op closed in November, leaving 200,000 New Yorkers without coverage.
Health Republic Insurance of New York is being investigated by the state for “substantial under-reporting” of its finances and may be investigated by the FBI.
Community Health Alliance Tennessee ended coverage for 27,000 people in October. The co-op reported $22.9 million in net assets, and suffered $22.1 million in losses the year before.
Health Republic Insurance Company in Oregon, which also closed in October, is now suing the federal government for $5 billion. The co-op filed suit because it never received $20 million in federal funding after Congress amended the “risk corridor” program under Obamacare. The co-op still owes the federal government $60 million in loans.
Prior to the lawsuit, the Oregon-based co-op lost $12.9 million, but reported $11.4 million in net assets.
Nevada Health did not paint a rosy picture of its finances to the IRS, and did not count taxpayer-funded loans as assets on its filings. The co-op lost over $16 million in 2014, and reported negative net assets of $29 million. Citing high costs, Nevada Health closed in August after receiving $65.9 million in loans from the federal government.
The outlook for co-ops still operating is grim. Agency officials are now warning that eight of the 11 remaining co-ops are on the verge of financial collapse.
This year is a “make or break” for Evergreen Health Cooperative in Maryland, which used the same accounting trick, listing $8 million in net assets despite losing $16.3 million.
The prospects for Maine Community Health Options, which listed negative $1 million in assets, seem grim after the co-op lost more than $17 million in the first nine months of 2015.
Even co-ops that are confident about their finances, like HealthyCT, Inc. do not expect to turn a profit until 2017. The co-op lost $28 million in 2014, but listed $58 million in net assets.
Oregon’s Health Co-Op, the second co-op in the state, is still operating, and listed negative net assets of $17.7 million in 2014. The co-op paid its CEO $315,706 despite “abysmal enrollment” that drew less than 1,600 members. This resulted in a $6.8 million loss for the co-op.
The Portland Tribune recently noted the co-op has survived on a “combination of caution and pure luck.”
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services did not respond to a request for comment.

 

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
26,039
Tokens
8 of the remaining 11 are most likely closing within 12 months.
The liberals continue to tout this as a success.

Only in the fucked up liberal 'facts dont matter' mind can complete economical disasters be justified because now "more people have health care"....regardless of the damage caused in the process.

Do you libs understand what fuck ups you are?
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
8 of the remaining 11 are most likely closing within 12 months.
The liberals continue to tout this as a success.

Only in the fucked up liberal 'facts dont matter' mind can complete economical disasters be justified because now "more people have health care"....regardless of the damage caused in the process.

Do you libs understand what fuck ups you are?


from the above article:
CEO $315,706 despite “abysmal enrollment” that drew less than 1,600 members.


My guess is he is a Democrat lol - see below - Ditto

Health Republic Insurance of New York listed $77.5 million in losses, but also $63.7 million in net assets. CEO Debra Friedman was the highest paid official at a failed Obamacare co-op, earning $427,632 in 2014. The co-op closed in November, leaving 200,000 New Yorkers without coverage.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
Obamacare is a clusterfuck, the debate is over

although it managed to provide health insurance for some people, it failed miserably for everybody else and for everything else, it's a failure in every way that matters

my guesstimate is 85/15 failure, with 80/20 being it's best possible score, and I have more 1st hand "overall, broad based" experience with this poppycock than nearly everyone


it's actually a fucking laughing stock, just like it's namesake, and that's no joke
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
ObamaCare Is Failing To Make Care More Affordable

ACA_1203.jpg
President Obama speaks about the Affordable Care Act in Nashville, Tenn., on July 1, 2015




Reprints
Health Reform: How can you tell if ObamaCare is a success or failure? A good place to start is with its official name: the “Affordable Care Act.” Measured against that, ObamaCare is failing miserably.
The promise of ObamaCare wasn’t just that insurance would be cheaper. It was that health care itself would be more affordable. It’s an important distinction.
Insurance that doesn’t cover anything, strictly limits the doctors you can see, imposes fantastically high deductibles, or costs too much to buy, does nothing to improve access to health care. Nor do insurance plans — like Medicaid — that doctors refuse to accept.
So far, that’s all ObamaCare has delivered.
Premiums are sky high and deductibles for a Bronze plan average more than $5,000. To keep costs down, insurers skimp on provider networks, making it more likely patients will end up paying out of pocket for care they need. Medicaid enrollment has exploded while the number of doctors willing to take Medicaid shrinks.
The result is that, despite the hundreds of billions in insurance subsidies, health care isn’t any more affordable today than it was before ObamaCare.
That failure is made clear by a new Gallup survey, which finds that, as ObamaCare enters its third year, 31% of Americans say they or their family members put off treatments because of costs.
This figure is unchanged from before just ObamaCare started and two points higher than when Obama took office. It’s 12 points higher than it was in 2001.
Gallup also found that 19% say they’ve put off treatment for a serious condition because of costs, up from 17% when Obama took office and 12% in 2001.
None of this is going to get better down the road. Premiums for the most popular plans in the biggest ObamaCare markets posted double-digit increases because of higher-than-expected health costs.
Deductibles are up as well, as are the use of narrow networks, to keep premiums from gong even higher.
And the failure of so many non-profit ObamaCare co-ops this year and ObamaCare-driven industry consolidation, plus United Healthcare’s threat to abandon ObamaCare next year, will mean fewer choices and less competition going forward.
President Obama likes to pretend that there aren’t any better alternatives to his “Affordable Care Act.” The truth is that almost anything would be an improvement over what ObamaCare is doing to health care.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
How sad is it to think the next president is likely to be as bad as Obama? Never thought that could happen. Yet here we are.....
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
How sad is it to think the next president is likely to be as bad as Obama? Never thought that could happen. Yet here we are.....

Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't you have a positive experience with Obamacare? I knew you had said something but I forget the details. I've heard positive things from people who are actually using it but only negative from the usual suspects here.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't you have a positive experience with Obamacare? I knew you had said something but I forget the details. I've heard positive things from people who are actually using it but only negative from the usual suspects here.

It's pretty much turned out to be a wash so far. Saved on drugs and hospital bills but pay more in taxes. Per month rate also doubled first year. I'm not sure IBX can hang on before they bail.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,656
Tokens
How sad is it to think the next president is likely to be as bad as Obama? Never thought that could happen. Yet here we are.....

Imagine if someone told you 15 years ago that 2016 would be Donald Trump vs Hilary Clinton and to bet it if you don't believe them?

That person would have all your money.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
Adding to the thought above why would our best and brightest strive for the position of president when entrepreneurship can be so much more rewarding? But yeah, look at the choices we're left with? Incompetents, liars, bible thumpers, liars, and narcissistic blowhards.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
LOL I mistakenly wrote liars TWICE. Probably belongs there TWICE.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Adding to the thought above why would our best and brightest strive for the position of president when entrepreneurship can be so much more rewarding? But yeah, look at the choices we're left with? Incompetents, liars, bible thumpers, liars, and narcissistic blowhards.
You can always write in one of these guy.

th
th
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,656
Tokens
Trump had been mulling a run for awhile and set it up accordingly. Much harder for your avg successful person to seek the highest office if they don't fit into the box. See Bloomberg.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,946
Messages
13,575,480
Members
100,886
Latest member
ranajeet
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com