Obama To Americans - UN will Disarm You...

Search

Rx. Junior
Joined
Nov 3, 2006
Messages
5,533
Tokens
And I will take it a step further, The rash of Gun Violence that has broken out across the country is in fact deliberately carried out to this aim, which is to create more support for Gun Control, and ultimately Gun Confiscation....Every April, this happens....so watch out and
guard your surroundings..- Loren78

Jiverly Voong Kills 13 and then himself.
http://www.judicial-inc.biz/9413_dead_in_binghampton.htm

Richard Poplawski kills 5

http://www.judicial-inc.biz/94Heb_shoots_five_cops.htm

Father shoots 5 children dead and then turns the gun on himself
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/...un-himself.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Obama to Us: UN To Disarm Americans

http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/go...hp?q=1210170368

This is just in from Sen. Coburn's office. Obama has authored a bill, and it is now in the Senate, to give the UN .7% of our GNP to be used to feed hungry 3rd worlders, AND to use UN force to disarm you and me and all gun owners. No one in the media has brought this to the attention of the general sheeple out here.

Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: Obama's bill S2433 passed the committee and going to the Senate
Senator Coburn is blocking this bill.



Patrick Guinn




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Obama's bill S2433 would require the U.S. to initially direct .7 percent of our GNP into the United Nations coffers for distribution as they see fit, for "food" to third world nations. Under earlier agreements this would evolve into a national tax on the U.S. with the UN attempting to levy this on all first world nations.

The U.N. would have the power to increase this rate of taxation.

The U.S. would be required to surrender some of its sovereignty over foreign aid by putting it under UN control. The bill would force the U.S. to sign onto the U.N.'s Millennium Declaration, which would commit us not only to "banning small arms and light weapons" but also to adhere to the International Criminal Court Treaty and the Kyoto Protocol.


http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2433.html

Detailed Summary

Global Poverty Act of 2007 - Directs the President, through the Secretary of State, to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the U.S. foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the United Nations Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.

Requires the strategy to contain specific and measurable goals and to consist of specified components, including: (1) continued investment or involvement in existing U.S. initiatives related to international poverty reduction and trade preference programs for developing countries; (2) improving the effectiveness of development assistance and making available additional overall United States assistance levels as appropriate; (3) enhancing and expanding debt relief as appropriate; (4) mobilizing and leveraging the participation of businesses and public-private partnerships; (5) coordinating the goal of poverty reduction with other internationally recognized Millennium Development Goals; and (6) integrating principles of sustainable development and entrepreneurship into policies and programs.

Sets forth specified reporting requirements. Directs the Secretary of State to designate a coordinator who will have primary responsibility for overseeing and drafting the reports, as well as responsibility for helping to implement recommendations contained in the reports.<br>

Defines specified terms.

Status of the Legislation

Latest Major Action: 4/24/2008: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 718.


http://kilosparksitup.blogspot.com/2008/02...433-global.html

More on Barack Obama's S.2433 : Global Poverty Act
We know for a fact that this bill will cost America $845 billion above and beyond what America already spends on global aid in the next thirteen years. America will be locked in to giving .7 percent of the U.S. gross national product. That in itself is scary enough, but there is way more to Obama's bill. It also locks us into United Nations Millennium Summit. Cliff Kincaid from Accuracy in Media is all over this bill. He writes-(Underlined by me)

The bill institutes the United Nations Millennium Summit goals as the benchmarks for U.S. spending.

"It is time the United States makes it a priority of our foreign policy to meet this goal and help those who are struggling day to day," a statement issued by supporters, including Obama, said.

Specifically, it would "declare" that the official U.S. policy is to eliminate global poverty, that the president is "required" to "develop and implement" a strategy to reach that goal and requires that the U.S. efforts be "specific and measurable."

Kincaid said that after cutting through all of the honorable-sounding goals in the plan, the bottom line is that the legislation would mandate the 0.7 percent of the U.S. GNP as "official development assistance."

"In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that (U.N.) declaration commits nations to banning 'small arms and light weapons' and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention of Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Convention of the Rights of the Child," he said.

Those U.N. protocols would make U.S. law on issues ranging from the 2nd Amendment to energy usage and parental rights all subservient to United Nations whims.

Kincaid also reported Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the "Millennium Project," confirms a U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP would add about $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already donates overseas.

And the only way to raise that funding, Sachs confirms, "is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels," Kincaid writes.

On the forum run by Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, one writer reported estimates of taxes from 35 cents to $1 dollar a gallon on gasoline would be needed.(LINK)

This ladies and gentleman is the Barack Obama vision for America . WND called Obama's office and the others who support this bill....No comments.


http://kilosparksitup.blogspot.com/2008/02...overty-act.html
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
Conservatives Spread Disinformation About S2433 in Attempt to Demonize Obama


By Robert Fanney

Conservatives are desperate these days. So desperate, it seems, that they would attack policies they previously supported in order to tear down supercandidate, Barak Obama. After a massive negative media blitz, smear campaign, and attack ads targeting the Senator failed to provide Bush II, aka John McCain, with enough traction in the polls, a number conservative PACs have been let off their leashes.

One, called the Eagle Forum (formerly Stop ERA), has taken particular interest in the S2433 legislation recently proposed by Senator Barak Obama. What's so bad about S2433? Well the Bill's primary goal is to continue support of a program already underway at the United Nations and already funded by the G8 or 8 richest countries in the world. To do this, the Bill provides incentive and funding for the new President to study how to continue and improve UN progress against world poverty. Currently, according to the S2433 body text, these countries, including the United States, contribute a total of $25 billion dollars per year to reduce poverty, increase education opportunities, provide potable water, and otherwise improve the standard of living of millions of the world's poor. Divide the total by 8 and these countries contribute approximately 3 billion per year each.

Now according to pundits at the Eagle Forum, this UN program will, among other things, cost US taxpayers $845 billion dollars. At this point, reality immediately converts to fiction. Nowhere does the UN in its Millennium Goals project ask the United States to fork over such a large sum. Instead, the program is asking for a doubling of aid -- from 25 billion to 50 billion -- to reach its goals by 2015. Out of the G8, even if the US provided 20 percent, the total would amount to 70 billion over the program's lifetime. Perhaps the Eagle Forum mistook the entire G8 for the US and, instead, added the total program cost spread over all nations to the US. Even so, their math would be wrong. $200 Billion for the first 8 years and $350 billion for the next seven do not $845 billion make.

You do the math.

Even more disturbing is the attack on a beneficial program that saves the lives of millions each year. Not only was this Millennium Goals project of the United Nations supported by both President Bush and Secretary of State Rice, it has, so far, witnessed huge success in reducing world poverty, hunger, and violence against women and children and may achieve its goals if it continues. As we have seen, these conditions of extreme poverty have lead to violence and supported the formation of terrorist entities with anti-American interests. Elimination of poverty is not only moral, it is a national security issue.

Furthermore, the S2433 Bill would only require and provide funding to the new President to research means for continuation of the current UN anti-poverty program. The additional cost of this Bill is a mere $1 million dollars above current expenses.

So why have conservatives supported such programs in the past and, only recently, begun to attack them? It would seem clear, given the evidence, that such attacks are for political purposes. The ridiculous claims of conservative pundits include the supposition that the UN program is a taxation regime for world government, that it subverts the powers of nations like the United States, and that it even provides funding for a UN military. None of this is true.
 

Everything's Legal in the USofA...Just don't get c
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
2,199
Tokens
Even more disturbing is the attack on a beneficial program that saves the lives of millions each year. Not only was this Millennium Goals project of the United Nations supported by both President Bush and Secretary of State Rice, it has, so far, witnessed huge success in reducing world poverty, hunger, and violence against women and children and may achieve its goals if it continues.

Examples, please.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
If I had to pick a side on the one, Loren or DEAC, I’d side with Loren. I just do not trust the young Kenyan.
 

Rx. Junior
Joined
Nov 3, 2006
Messages
5,533
Tokens
Death Eats a Cracker....This ain't the time for politics....The U.N. Agenda..is a Mandate and Mandates are run by technocrats whom operate outside of the confines and restrictions of the so called Political Spectrum Politics is a show for the public, it doesn't matter. Depopulation does...and any country that does not work to get its population down over the next 40 or so years will face starvation....Hunger is not a problem...to be solved, it is a bargaining chip in a high stakes game of Geopolitical Chess...


"Conservatives.." lol......

and stop using labels.....its juvenile...
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
1) It's good to see that Lauren's former dire predictions of "food riots" and "The end of the world" have been expanded to "the next 40 years".

2) Huge LOL at the notion that any body, regardless of size, could disarm the US populace from their (currently) approximately 250 million privately owned firearms.
 

Pro Handi-Craper My Picks are the shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
4,098
Tokens
I know a couple of street gangs that could take out the UN troops.
 

Rx. Junior
Joined
Nov 3, 2006
Messages
5,533
Tokens
I know a couple of street gangs that could take out the UN troops.

Those Street Gangs are run by the CIA...and will be neutralized the minute they become no longer useful....Until that point, they will be used to subdue the public with Domestic Terrorism under guise of "Crime"....directly resulting in a rise in Conservative right wing fascism which will then be used as a an excuse to carry out Patriot Act Laws against the public....
 

Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
5,905
Tokens
^ lol

the dominoes are almost in place for us to finally show them how powerful we are

in the meantime we will let them be cool
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
^ lol

the dominoes are almost in place for us to finally show them how powerful we are

in the meantime we will let them be cool

I'll see your lol and raise you with a double :lol::lol:

Any day now, the street gangs under the control of Them will whip the rest of us all into shape.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
3,375
Tokens
Those Street Gangs are run by the CIA...and will be neutralized the minute they become no longer useful....Until that point, they will be used to subdue the public with Domestic Terrorism under guise of "Crime"....directly resulting in a rise in Conservative right wing fascism which will then be used as a an excuse to carry out Patriot Act Laws against the public....

Is this for real? I mean seriously?

Do you post this stuff because you really believe it or because you want people to laugh at you?
 

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
430
Tokens
LOREN78 actually seems very intelligent but also very disturbed. most paranoids do tend to have above average IQ's though. i'm not trying to be funny, i seriously think you need psychiatric help. the world is far from being a place of innocence but your extreme theories are pure fantasy. for the worlds governments & our in particular to be able to carry on with so many conspiracies simultaneously & continuing them through multiple administrations over the course of 10, 15 or 25 years would be laughable if the thought of you believing this wasn't so frightening. i believe we will be seeing you on tv soon with the media reporting quotes from your co-workers describing you as " a loner" or your neighbors saying "he kept to himself".
 

Rx. Junior
Joined
Nov 3, 2006
Messages
5,533
Tokens
LOREN78 actually seems very intelligent but also very disturbed. most paranoids do tend to have above average IQ's though. i'm not trying to be funny, i seriously think you need psychiatric help. the world is far from being a place of innocence but your extreme theories are pure fantasy. for the worlds governments & our in particular to be able to carry on with so many conspiracies simultaneously & continuing them through multiple administrations over the course of 10, 15 or 25 years would be laughable if the thought of you believing this wasn't so frightening. i believe we will be seeing you on tv soon with the media reporting quotes from your co-workers describing you as " a loner" or your neighbors saying "he kept to himself".

Thats Nice...but what do you think about Gun Control? Is an armed Society a Polite One?
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
Why don't you address his point without brushing it off?

Have you taken the time to actually consider that you may be nuts?

I mean you seriously believe that you have information about dozens and dozens of conspiracies that the average person doesn't have. This sounds like a classic meglalomaniac. Sorry to break it to you, dude but you're not special and you do not possess special knowledge.

Get help.
 

I PISS EXCELLENCE
Joined
Oct 12, 2007
Messages
461
Tokens
Have you seen this story? Its pretty crazy... The mom was crazy and thought she was the anti-christ or some shit, and needed to save her son. So she takes the son to a gun range and shoots him in the back on the head and then turns the gun on herself. They have the whole thing on surveillance. This all happened close to where I live, its a pretty crazy story.

Here is the news story:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orl-asecgunrange06040609apr06,0,5962752.story

Here is the video:
WARNING GRAPHIC
http://www.nothingtoxic.com/media/1239150446/Mother_Shoots_Son_in_Head_Then_Kills_Self_at_Gun_Range
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
I do not want to click on the video link. Someone tell me if it looks as bad as it sounds.
 

Rx. Junior
Joined
Nov 3, 2006
Messages
5,533
Tokens
Have you seen this story? Its pretty crazy... The mom was crazy and thought she was the anti-christ or some shit, and needed to save her son. So she takes the son to a gun range and shoots him in the back on the head and then turns the gun on herself. They have the whole thing on surveillance. This all happened close to where I live, its a pretty crazy story.

Here is the news story:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orl-asecgunrange06040609apr06,0,5962752.story

Here is the video:
WARNING GRAPHIC
http://www.nothingtoxic.com/media/1239150446/Mother_Shoots_Son_in_Head_Then_Kills_Self_at_Gun_Range

So....are you for gun control? Gun Confiscation?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,923
Messages
13,575,275
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com