Sure you can say those are the facts but unfortunately Enflameo you’re still wrong.
Why is it that what you stated just prove my point further?
Maybe the RX attorneys can chime in.... what penal code is “suspicion”
Suspicious activity is not a crime!!!!! Sorrry. Keep trying. Someone acting suspicious is not enough for a cop to legally stop them. Now, can they still stop that “suspicious” person? Of course. But it is a violation of that persons rights. You better have seen him toss a bag of crack because “suspicious” isn’t going to cut it pal. That’s why he lost his fucking job lmfaooooo. Keep arguing. You fell for the bait this time.
THESE are the facts.
Two things.
Would I have stopped Garner? Hell no but that's a different story. Would I refuse police direction if stopped? No.
1) No, I'm not wrong. They stopped Garner based on what I described. I'm not wrong...those are the facts as we all know them.
2) Police can stop anyone they suspect is in the act of committing a crime.
Why do you think it's possible for the police to arrest a mom or dad they suspect is abusing their child? The case still as to go to court and the state has to prove their case but of course they can stop the parents and question them and if they have enough evidence, arrest them. Now, the parents could refuse to answer questions but of course the investigators can stop them based on their suspicion a crime is being committed.
Are you trolling again?