This notion that the SEC is the best just because they're assumed to be the best is bunk. The SEC has cheated for decades. They know it and they looked the other way and didn't turn other teams in. Now with it being legal to pay players, NIL has leveled the playing field. The SEC no longer gets a rubber stamp as the "best football conference". No SEC team has won the natty the last two years. Yes, half of the SEC sucks.
Georgia is very good, but not as good as their back to back national championship years. a&m's played the easiest conference schedule in history. They got exposed against S. Carolina and Texas. The collective record of the teams they played was 11-41. Mississippi, Texas and Vandy are good. OU is a farce. The rest of the teams are average to bad. The Big 10 is the best conference now for the last three years.
I guess the AP is wrong to put eight SEC teams in their final Top 25, and only 5 from the Big 10.
I have a close friend, a fanatic Texas fan, and he always hated that the SEC was so strong and so well recognized by the media and the public, pissed him off. NOW, he has mellowed since Texas joined the SEC. You have not, I guess.
Last year Georgia would have won it all if Beck, one of the top QBs in the nation, did not get hurt, and a green QB forced to play. Gunner made a few mistakes that turned around a tight game and they were eliminated. He is now that starter and doing well but NOT a top notch QB compared to others in the playoffs, but Georgia can win it all with him at QB if he plays well.
OSU has the amazing talent to win it all, too. Indiana did not impress me but they must be good if they held OSU down like they did.
Those are the three teams that have the best shot IMO.
Tech, no, Oregon, no.
AGAIN,
Tulane & James Madison, should NOT be in this, and ND-Texas-BYU-Vandy, even Utah have an argument as the current system stands.