Nothing like using coercion to force people to do something, then brag about how successful it is...

[GasMan 0]

Must be a proud fucking day to be a Democrat and force people to buy something they don't want, and if they don't, fine them through the IRS.

 

[JohnnyMac 0]

Yeah! Like when Reagan told the 50 states to raise their drinking age to 21 or lose their federal highway funding!

States Rights all the way!

 

[JohnnyMac 0]

And, by the way, it was the Republicans on the US Supreme Court who found the ACA to be a taxing power, not Obama.

 

[rolltide 0]

what the hell does forcing people to purchase an expensive service have to do with reagan mandating a drinking age?

holy fuck that's a ridiculous correlation

 

[Dave007inVegas 0]

what the hell does forcing people to purchase an expensive service have to do with reagan mandating a drinking age?

holy fuck that's a ridiculous correlation

You got that right. Everyone knows it’s GW’s fault.

 

[JohnnyMac 0]

what the hell does forcing people to purchase an expensive service have to do with reagan mandating a drinking age?

holy fuck that's a ridiculous correlation

Coercion is coercion. That is right in the title of the thread.

 

[hehateme82 0]

Yeah! Like when Reagan told the 50 states to raise their drinking age to 21 or lose their federal highway funding!

States Rights all the way!

Reagan was wrong to do that, happy?, now stay on fucking topic.

 

[JohnnyMac 0]

Reagan was wrong to do that, happy?, now stay on fucking topic.

Yes! Now let's get back to how Justice Roberts (Republican and Bush appointee) found the ACA to be a tax.

 

[Acebb 0]

Yeah! Like when Reagan told the 50 states to raise their drinking age to 21 or lose their federal highway funding!

States Rights all the way!

Um, "Ronald Reagan" did no such thing.

In 1984, the National Minimum Legal Drinking Act, written by Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) and influenced by Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), required all states to enforce a minimum legal drinking age of 21 or else risk losing 10% of all federal highway construction funds.

Note that that act, written by a Democrat and supported by a Democratic House of Representatives, only affected 19 states as the remaining had been 21 by that time.

But hey, what's another lie in service to your silly, dipstick political beliefs, right?

 

[GasMan 0]

Jesus Christ Mac, now you know why I never reply to your posts. Thanks for letting the newbies in here know how big of a hack you are in two short weeks. I saw you were trying to ease into a comeback of sorts around here...might wanna take another year or so off.

 

[GasMan 0]

So, Obama is still bragging about how many sign ups there are?

What a joy it has been to have lived through this disaster.

 

[akphidelt 0]

Some people simply don't want others to have affordable healthcare! What a shame!! 7 million and counting, get your tissues out girls, you'll be crying for years!

 

[SheriffJoe 0]

 

[SheriffJoe 0]

Some people simply don't want others to have affordable healthcare! What a shame!! 7 million and counting, get your tissues out girls, you'll be crying for years!

 

[GasMan 0]

Some people simply don't want others to have affordable healthcare! What a shame!! 7 million and counting, get your tissues out girls, you'll be crying for years!

Affordable..what a fucking laugh. You are the biggest hack on the board, hands down.

 

[JohnnyMac 0]

Um, "Ronald Reagan" did no such thing.

In 1984, the National Minimum Legal Drinking Act, written by Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) and influenced by Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), required all states to enforce a minimum legal drinking age of 21 or else risk losing 10% of all federal highway construction funds.

Who was president in 1984? Who signed this bill into law? Reagan supported the bill, and he made it law.

Kind of funny, isn't it, a Republican agreeing with a Democrat? That would never be allowed by today's GOP.

 

[JohnnyMac 0]

Jesus Christ Mac, now you know why I never reply to your posts. Thanks for letting the newbies in here know how big of a hack you are in two short weeks. I saw you were trying to ease into a comeback of sorts around here...might wanna take another year or so off.

Naw, wasn't trying a comeback, because I wasn't gone. I just had a free hour a few days ago. Just too much anger and hatred down here to hang out too long.

And, I realized long ago that you just come in here to shoot off your mouth because that makes you feel good about yourself. You have a lot of that anger, and are one of the main reasons this place is unpleasant.

 

[akphidelt 0]

Affordable..what a fucking laugh. You are the biggest hack on the board, hands down.

It's not called the expensive care act. It's the affordable care act for a reason. Why do you hate the fact that people who didn't have it can get affordable care now? Does that make you mad?

 

[GasMan 0]

Naw, wasn't trying a comeback, because I wasn't gone. I just had a free hour a few days ago. Just too much anger and hatred down here to hang out too long.

And, I realized long ago that you just come in here to shoot off your mouth because that makes you feel good about yourself. You have a lot of that anger, and are one of the main reasons this place is unpleasant.

Shut the fuck up asswipe.

You wanna try me?

 

[GasMan 0]

It's not called the expensive care act. It's the affordable care act for a reason. Why do you hate the fact that people who didn't have it can get affordable care now? Does that make you mad?

Simple solution = expand Medicare and Medicaid, raise taxes.

Bottom line, ultimately all it's done.