Not all banks are greedy: Wells Fargo shares up 25%

Search

New member
Joined
Mar 16, 2006
Messages
673
Tokens
raising dividends while earnings are falling seems like smoke and mirrors. Wallstreet was happy and buffett loves this one.

Your right though some great value here if you can just figure out who. If a few go under it will benefit those who survive.
 

the bear is back biatches!! printing cancel....
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,692
Tokens
of course its smoke and mirrors

dead cat bounce

classic bear market action with super ramp jobs in the trash

tizgloom and doom near term bull

buy, buy, buy

sub 10000 coming after they done with this bear shake giving bulls hope all the way down

we bear play with your emotions

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,373
Tokens
raising dividends while earnings are falling seems like smoke and mirrors. Wallstreet was happy and buffett loves this one.

Your right though some great value here if you can just figure out who. If a few go under it will benefit those who survive.

The article says earnings are increasing.
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,373
Tokens
of course its smoke and mirrors

dead cat bounce

classic bear market action with super ramp jobs in the trash

tizgloom and doom near term bull

buy, buy, buy

sub 10000 coming after they done with this bear shake giving bulls hope all the way down

we bear play with your emotions

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

Any support for your statements? Did you read the article to know that there is substance behind the optimistic outlook? Your "dead cat bounce" statement does not apply here. Please try to be relevant.
 

the bear is back biatches!! printing cancel....
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,692
Tokens
divy raising is the oldest trick in the book to keep equity prices afloat

also well fargo isn't in deep shit like some others they probably are okay

there are more indymac's coming in the future

near term banks won't be as bad as expectations most likely....but long term the gloom and doom gonna last longer than expected...

earlier it was recovering in 2nd half of 2008 now they've given up on that

now they shooting for early 2009 recovery

and come end of 2008 they'll be shooting for 2nd half of 2009 recovery
 

New member
Joined
Mar 16, 2006
Messages
673
Tokens
The company said that it earned $1.75 billion, or 53 cents a share, compared with $2.28 billion or 67 cents a share in the same period a year ago.

No decreasing.......I think you might not of read correctly,revenue did increase though
 

the bear is back biatches!! printing cancel....
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,692
Tokens
also there will be some winners outta this mess as well after its all said and done

as things progress you are gonna have stapedes from iffy banks to sound banks

for instance i had my mom move from NCC over to USB even though USB is offering much lower rates on money markets and CDs

WFC probably in the sound bank category IMO well its equity price tells me so at least

unlike WM, NCC, ZION and many others

banking industry needs alot more consolidation and cleansing

some really bad ones that did bad things are gonna have to be thrown to the wolves or taken over by others like bear stearns and indymac
 

Triple digit silver kook
Joined
Mar 1, 2005
Messages
13,697
Tokens
WFC has been spared alot of the stock price decline relative to its sector.

QL comedy gold today.

90% of the sector has been smashed the past year and you are past posting today about one stock that had a great day.

Cant post in the sell thread anymore, eh?

Any comment about VMW mister glass half full?

You sure loved that one last year.
 

the bear is back biatches!! printing cancel....
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,692
Tokens
y USB that i think is fine and didn't get involved much in the mortgage market really got beat down today as well

ramping 14% today

looking at things it got a bit overdone near term and really spilled into some of the bigger sounder banks as well probably too much at least on a near term basis

correction to the upside looks necessary before we plunge more
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,373
Tokens
The company said that it earned $1.75 billion, or 53 cents a share, compared with $2.28 billion or 67 cents a share in the same period a year ago.

No decreasing.......I think you might not of read correctly,revenue did increase though

My mistake. Revenue is increasing.

:103631605
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,373
Tokens
WFC has been spared alot of the stock price decline relative to its sector.

QL comedy gold today.

90% of the sector has been smashed the past year and you are past posting today about one stock that had a great day.

Cant post in the sell thread anymore, eh?

Any comment about VMW mister glass half full?

You sure loved that one last year.

All I saw in the sell thread was a bunch of pack dogs descending on a carcass ignoring the other healthy sectors available. I think there are many here that take delight in their own misery.

Made a good amount on VMW until it started decreasing then got out.

Do you see any favorable sectors in the market WOOF or are you only pointing out the negative to support your bearish predictions?

Do you have any support for your 90% of the sector being smashed? All I see are statements but rarely see support from you.

You are right, the banking sector is not what it used to be.

http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=...=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined

But an honest question here, I see that in the mid-90's the banking sector shot up to the low 90's and stayed there even during the crash of 2001+. Any reason that it stayed buoyant during that time? Just wondering.
 

the bear is back biatches!! printing cancel....
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,692
Tokens
actually jambo the deflationist bear in me says people are gonna be perplexed when oil stays down for the count and the market continue to tank

after this dead cat bounce is over

to date i've been wrong on that though

----------

buy some garbage near term QL the bear market rallies are viscous and can be very profitable if you are trading but don't hold long term

i went with GE down here as a conservative long with some of the money from shorts i covered if it all works out and i get 10% or so gain

plan on letting the profits ride long term when i think the next top is in

GE probably going lower but eh pays a good divy and won't go under so buying up shares cheap

building up a long term portfolio with my short profits along the way...
 

the bear is back biatches!! printing cancel....
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,692
Tokens
But an honest question here, I see that in the mid-90's the banking sector shot up to the low 90's and stayed there even during the crash of 2001+. Any reason that it stayed buoyant during that time? Just wondering.


companies were flush with all kinda of cash at the tech bubble height problem then was the growth rates just weren't sustainable and speculation was crazy

our budget was nearly balanced in washington as well at the peak due to all the tax revenue

financially we were sound at the time just got way to overenthusiastic

same thing happening in china they sound financially but 50+ average p/es not sustainable 6000 to sub 3000 plunge there on their stock market

over the past 5 years though the really really bad stuff starting piling up with the big time debt bubble games created to make the pain of the tech bubble fallout worse

secular bear started in 2000 IMO they last a long time....we just threw in an inflationary bubbilicous cyclical bull from 2002 to 2007
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,373
Tokens
companies were flush with all kinda of cash at the tech bubble height problem then was the growth rates just weren't sustainable and speculation was crazy

our budget was nearly balanced in washington as well at the peak due to all the tax revenue

financially we were sound at the time just got way to overenthusiastic

same thing happening in china they sound financially but 50+ average p/es not sustainable 6000 to sub 3000 plunge there on their stock market

over the past 5 years though the really really bad stuff starting piling up with the big time debt bubble games created to make the pain of the tech bubble fallout worse

secular bear started in 2000 IMO they last a long time....we just threw in an inflationary bubbilicous cyclical bull from 2002 to 2007

This post shows that you are well-versed in economics. Thanks for the input tizzer.

:toast:
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,373
Tokens
i like GE as well(very long term) but for a completely different reason (water desalination) but i am not getting into that right now...

I will just hold it and laugh at folks 3-5 years from now..:toast:
There are plans for a new desalination plant to be built near me in Huntington Beach, Cal. What is it you like about this technology that can make it profitable? I'm reading that there are environmental concerns. Can this interfere with GE's profitability?
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,373
Tokens
I was also under the impression that because a whole lot of infrastructure had been built during the tech boom, there was still something solid left in the aftermath of the tech boom(simplified way of looking at it)

Difference with a credit bubble is just that..Its based on potential to repay debt and nothing more. If people borrow too much, cant afford to pay it back, lose their houses, and jobs from consequent economic slow down, that is much much worse than the tech boom that left alot of still viable infrastructure still standing.

You can imagine a bank foreclosing on a house for far less than was borrowed on it, and still failing to sell the same house to recoup even a fraction of the debt they thought they could recoup from its original value because the market is already flooded with fore closed houses.

Its a vicious cycle and a perfect storm for a good size collapse worse than the tech bubble

I've mentioned in other posts that the reason a lot of these banks are having troubles is that they are/were heavily leveraged. They owed more than they were worth. There was another thread about whether Citibank would go under. I believe Citi and Wells Fargo are working under quite different models and are not as leveraged as Indy Mac/Countrywide/etc.
 

the bear is back biatches!! printing cancel....
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,692
Tokens
desalination is extremely energy intensive

but potable water shortage will be a huge worldwide issue in the not too distant future

tensions in the ME not just about oil...also about water
 

the bear is back biatches!! printing cancel....
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,692
Tokens
I was also under the impression that because a whole lot of infrastructure had been built during the tech boom, there was still something solid left in the aftermath of the tech boom(simplified way of looking at it)

Difference with a credit bubble is just that..Its based on potential to repay debt and nothing more. If people borrow too much, cant afford to pay it back, lose their houses, and jobs from consequent economic slow down, that is much much worse than the tech boom that left alot of still viable infrastructure still standing.

You can imagine a bank foreclosing on a house for far less than was borrowed on it, and still failing to sell the same house to recoup even a fraction of the debt they thought they could recoup from its original value because the market is already flooded with fore closed houses.

Its a vicious cycle and a perfect storm for a good size collapse worse than the tech bubble

the tech bubble was never allowed to fully burst as well

due to greenspan's "fighting deflation" that led to this current bubble debt bubble we now have

some went under and others ripped through tons of cash but some were allowed to stay afloat on debt

AMD will likely get bankrupted by intel for example by the end
 

the bear is back biatches!! printing cancel....
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,692
Tokens
plus as far as viscous cycle/perfect storm

we got baby boomers starting to retire now and my generation likely not gonna see a dime of SS that we paying in

just very gloomy looking long term and no way to candy coat it really

that said equity prices tend to bottom out much quicker than the real economy

for example great depression started in 1929 equities hit bottom in 1932....but was still a depression on the streets into the late 30s

once i see GE types in the single digits P/E wise likely when we getting near the end of the equity pain

and honestly only a rational response to the 40 p/es we saw in GE types in 2000....the ebbs and flows of the marketplace

that's the big thing that was crazy about the tech bubble you had huge low growth blue chip companies at humongous p/es

at times things get extremely overvalued at times things get extremely undervalued....we likely heading towards and extremely undervalued time

also techs need some reevalution/repricing intel is a GE type at this point....shouldn't be at a p/e near 20
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,947
Messages
13,575,541
Members
100,888
Latest member
bj88gameslife
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com