Nice SIA middle at 3 PM !

[Doug]

I was going to rest SIA a bit, but this is too good to pass on.

Montana +21 -110 SIA

Washington -19, if you can get a free half

AND

SIA gives you back the bet if you lose by 3 or 17 today only, so another number ( 17) that's viable.

 

[Doug]

It don't get much better than this in real time. Clean middle on 20. Side it with 17, 19, 21.

 

[Doug]

It's gone now... +19.5 at SIA.

 

[Doug]

Anybody catch it ? I gave it out after I bet it, for you guys !

Tell me that's a bad bet, I dare you !

 

[nimue77]

You will be kicked out eventually if most of your bets are like this one. 15k and you're done.

 

[Doug]

You will be kicked out eventually if most of your bets are like this one. 15k and you're done.

I don't care if this 3rd rate book boots me, just so long as they pay me in the process.

Conventional bookmaking has the bookie dealing a number with near equal action on both sides.

I don't book but if I did I wouldn't care who won or lost, even if a line moved 5 points and I had equal enough action on every increment ( half point and or juice move). That's no risk ( with post-up) booking. Bookie gets +110. I'd write that all day long, if legal.

The smarter and sharper guys ( like Pinnacle) shade it to one side.


SIA shouldn't profile players, they should encourage as much action as possible to maximize profits, and not care who wins and loses, so long as they get their hold % of overall action. I've asked about a hundred times how all the squares land there, nobody ever answers my question.

SIA is risk adverse ( or traditional).

Ain't no way they should limit a player's lifetime winnings, they are a Fvcking broker, nothing more nothing less ( esp. SIA).

SIA is unfortunately " A ship of Fools" to quote the late great Jim Morrison.

 

[nimue77]

If, and I don't know whether this is the case or not, SIA has more squares than anything else it is as a result of them booting winners and obviously not booting losers. It's that simple.

I don't care if this 3rd rate book boots me, just so long as they pay me in the process.

Conventional bookmaking has the bookie dealing a number with near equal action on both sides.

I don't book but if I did I wouldn't care who won or lost, even if a line moved 5 points and I had equal enough action on every increment ( half point and or juice move). That's no risk ( with post-up) booking. Bookie gets +110. I'd write that all day long, if legal.

The smarter and sharper guys ( like Pinnacle) shade it to one side.


SIA shouldn't profile players, they should encourage as much action as possible to maximize profits, and not care who wins and loses, so long as they get their hold % of overall action. I've asked about a hundred times how all the squares land there, nobody ever answers my question.

SIA is risk adverse ( or traditional).

Ain't no way they should limit a player's lifetime winnings, they are a Fvcking broker, nothing more nothing less ( esp. SIA).

SIA is unfortunately " A ship of Fools" to quote the late great Jim Morrison.

 

[X-Files]

I've asked about a hundred times how all the squares land there, nobody ever answers my question.

I'd guess it's a number of things such as:

1} They don't advertize at sharp hangouts like the Rx, MW, etc

2} They do advertize at square places.