NFL Playoffs: Saturday Wild Card Plays

Search

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
Falcons @ Cardinals
Play: Cardinals +1
Comment
The Falcons came into the season with low expectations. They quickly appeared to overachieve by finishing the first quarter of the season with 2 wins, but flew under the radar by losing to two quality teams decisively. However, their offense really hit stride in the second quarter and never slowed down. They went on three separate multi game winning streaks, and only lost three of their last 12 games. During that duration, the teams intrinsic worth progressively got slightly better, lead by a top tier offense and a defense that at one point achieved mediocrity. Where are they now? In my opinion, this team is off their high, but not by much. Their offense peaked about a month ago, but still warrants being labeled one of the best in all of football. Their defense also peaked around that time, but their current worth raises concerns, as leaks are starting to come in masses.

The Cardinals came into the season with higher expectations and a contender for the division title. They came out of the gates fast, lead by an overachieving offense that quickly became construed as top tier, and a defense that was not getting the same recognition, but early on, was worth as much as their offense. Their offense during the second quarter of the season hit another stride, while their defense didn’t let go of their above average status. Division contender thoughts transferred over to Super Bowl contender. However, the Cardinals hit a wall very acutely in the second half of the season. Warner’s regression lead to a supply chain effect, as their running game diminished as well as their passing game. Their defense also showed leaks amass; leading to what was once a decent defense becoming a liability on the field. Where are they now? There is no other team in the playoffs, and arguably all of football, that is off of their peak worth more than the Cardinals. There offense was the class of the league, and now just above average. Their defense even dropped even more.

There are two teams in this years playoffs that are no better than average teams. Both of which are matched up together. Both teams’ defenses are considerably below average. Enough below to offset any offensive worth that can allow them to be labeled solid teams.

Pros
Value: Obviously, if a line has no perceived value, it makes no sense to bet it. Dissecting this line, and you find a rare road favorite playoff team. Why are the Falcons favored on the road now, when they only were favored on the road just once all season (against the Raiders)? The Falcons were not getting the same respect on the road during the regular season, and it appeared to be warranted, as they only covered just 50% of their road games. The market had high expectations from the Cardinals at home, and they delivered. The covered five of eight, and were only put as home dogs twice all season, which were against teams the market prices higher than the Falcons.

Fundamentals: The Cardinals offense has witnessed serious deprecation, but they still possess a very potent passing game. They rely heavily on the pass and thus can better mask their deficiencies on the ground. The Falcons struggled defending the pass, and lack depth and experience in the secondary. Expect Warner to be successful attacking this weakness by spreading out the Falcons defense with multiple receiver sets and the best trio receiving group in all of football. The Falcons also defend the running back in the passing game poorly. Arrington, James, and Hightower can all be implemented as receiving threats. The biggest drop-off in the Falcons fundamental worth in the second half of the season has been their run defense. They went from bad to very bad defending the run. The Cardinals running game has suffered a drop off as well. A lot has to do with the drop off in the passing game. That said, expect the return of productivity in the passing game to allow their running game to feed of the spread formations and attack another glaring weakness in the Falcons defense. I see no reason for the Cardinals offense not to return to first half worth.

One thing that consistently appears to improve in the playoffs is tackling. Thus, power running attacks seem to be less productive in the playoffs. This might not appear to be much, but it is. The Cardinals defensive demise of late has been predicated a lot on poor tackling. Turners success on the ground has been predicated a lot of after contact yards. What appears to be a magnified advantage for the Falcons is something I feel should be shored up and limited Saturday. The Falcons biggest edge appears to be when they pass the ball. However, one also has to question if this edge can come to fruition, as anything can happen to a rookie quarterback in a road playoff game.

Home field advantage: Although both teams are dome teams, I feel home field advantage is magnified in this game. The Cardinals have been widely known as a dangerous home team and a worthless road team. They once again lived up to that adage this year, winning six of eight at home and finishing with a losing road record. Not many teams in football won at least three more home games than road games like the Cardinals. However, the Falcons are one of them. The dome will get loud, and Ryan can be rattled.

Tempo: If the Cardinals start out with the lead, watch out. The crowd will be relentless, Ryan can break down, the Falcons may be forced to abandon the run early, and the Cardinals will be in the driver’s seat to establish their tempo few teams like establishing. If the Falcons start out with an early lead, the Cardinals have a better chance of come back. Not only are they less reliant on their running game that they can easily go without, but their offense is one of the best second half offenses in all of football. The Falcons? Arguably the worst second half defense in the league. No lead is safe for the Falcons in this game.

Cons:
Current form: The Cardinals are going in a direction that is dangerous to back. A win against the Seahawks is not nearly enough to claim they are back. The Cardinals have dropped from a solid team to an average at best team in a 2 month span. Every facet of their game has gotten worse, some materially worse. Although the Falcons have also peaked, not nearly enough. Their drop offs have been less material and the breadth of the drop off has been less poignant. Playoffs are about who is playing better, and that edge goes to the Falcons.

Fundamentals: The Cardinals can’t stop the pass. A much more difficult match up for the Falcons would have been a Vikings team that would be able to put Ryan in a more spotlighted role with their ability to stop the run, and also pressure the quarterback. The Cardinals may not be able to implement such a strategy. If the Cardinals tacking doesn’t get better like expected, they will lose. The Falcons run too much, and can wear a team down. No tackling means not getting off the field. Not getting off the field means the likely hood of establishing the shootout the Cardinals want is slim. Ideally you want a potent running attack to face the Falcons. The Falcons biggest weakness is their run defense. The Cardinals biggest weakness is their running game. It is a running game that has also been unable to put forth solid performances against anemic run defenses. Can the Cardinals take advantage of this weakness? The chances of them capitalizing are less than any other playoff team.

Mistake Expectancy: Turnovers are magnified in the playoffs. Although Warner is the veteran with a Super Bowl ring and Ryan is rookie, claiming Warner is the likelier candidate to make a mistake is warranted. 21 fumbles lost and interceptions by Warner is evidenced of such, and nearly double that of Ryan.

Special Teams: The disparity here lies in the coverage skills. The Cardinals may be the worst in football. Special teams flies under the radar, but this disparity is big. In my opinion, the disparity is worth 1.5 points (in field position worth).

Conclusion:
It is hard to back a team that is like catching a falling knife. Backing the Cardinals feels like such. However, the market is giving me a pair of gloves by making them a home underdog. Expect the experience of Warner, the receiving depth that he is supported by, and the home field advantage to be too much for this young Falcons team to handle. Asking them to win a road playoff game is simply asking too much at this point and time. The Cardinals will likely advance to the next round, and then meet their fate.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
1,733
Tokens
Great write up and analysis.

I would rather back the team with a Q.B that has won a S.B rather than a rookie ( who has been impressive thus far) making his first road playoff start.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
1,733
Tokens
I just don't get why you would play +1.5 or +1 -110 or -115 . Why not play ML at -100 to -105 . I got Ml -103

The chances of Zona losing by 1 are quite slim and if you really calculate that into your plays then why bother gambling?

When I look back at all games on dogs of up to + 3. you can play them with the points ,but when you factor how many times the dogs won outright ,you are usually getting UP TO +150 for ML.

I can somewhat understand the +3 -110 but anything less you almost have to play the ML.

Just my useless two cents worth.

Good Luck fellows
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
1,523
Tokens
However, the market is giving me a pair of gloves by making them a home underdog.
I'm not playing this game, but this is not a home underdog. 1 point is not an underdog....it's a way for books to try and get money where they want it.
It's also now at a pick at most places.
 

Official Rx music critic and beer snob
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
25,128
Tokens
Great writeup. I am on Atlanta because of the running game. Interesting to see how the rookie qb's perform in their first playoff.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
Colts @ Chargers
Play: Colts Pick
Comment:
The Colts started the season slow out of the gates, losing two of their first three games. Pundits claimed this was a different team compared to years past, and that they would be unable to overcome the injury to their star quarterback. However, Manning slowly started to get healthier, and by the third quarter of the season, he was back to full strength. The result? Nine straight wins to close out the season. During that duration, the Colts intrinsic worth continued to get progressively higher, a sign that this team has yet to peak.

At the beginning of the season I claimed the Chargers were the biggest frauds in football. Put in any other division in football, and the Chargers would be watching today’s game from their living rooms. Winning just four games during the first three quarters of the season was predicated on horrific play by their defense and a lack of running game that they were not used to. However a soft fourth quarter schedule and the Chargers actually getting materially better as the season progressed allowed them to squeak through the playoffs. Are the Chargers still frauds? Yes and No. An 8 and 8 team does not deserve playing in the playoffs, but current form suggest that an 8-8 team is not stepping foot on the field right now, a much better team is.

Pros:
Market Price: The market had very high expectations from both teams throughout the season. Both teams had to play perfect football to cover games, which is no surprise to them ranking near the bottom in terms of ATS performance for playoff teams. However, with the current market price, the market is not asking for perfection, rather just a win. The Colts have proven the much more capable team of doing such, finishing the season with 50% more wins than their counterpart, and winning one more game in their last nine games than the Chargers did the entire season. When the market put both these teams in “win mode” rather than cover mode (an underdog or being favored by three or less), the Colts performed much better, wining five of seven compared to 1 of five for the Chargers. The Colts have also proved much more capable of surpassing market expectations against playoff teams this season, going 4-1 ATS in such games. The Chargers? Exact opposite, going 1-4.

Fundamentals: The Chargers have improved since their first meeting against the Colts, but not much. Their defense is still below average and vulnerable against the run and the pass. This leads to them having trouble getting off the field and allowing their potent offense to operate. This weakness is especially vulnerable against a Colts offense that works in methodical fashion, takes what the defense gives them, and is able to chip away at the field better than any other team in the league. The Chargers struggle defending the pass. Their inability to pressure the quarterback and being top heavy in the cover position (lacking depth), makes them vulnerable against an injured offensive line and a passing game can spread the ball to multiple receiving options better than any other team in the league as well. Expect the Colts to take advantage of the Chargers poor nickel and safety coverage by utilizing Gonzalez and Clark to the fullest. The Colts running game has suffered this year. But it is all not doom and gloom in this facet of the game. Addai has been battling injuries that has limited the productivity of the Colts running game. He is back to full health. The Colts also can mask their running game deficiencies with the first level passing game well. The Chargers have struggled defending the run all season, including last week in their most important game. Don’t be surprised if the Colts establish a running game that compliment Manning in the air.

The Chargers offense, like the Colts offense, is a top three offense in the NFL. However, unlike the Colts offense, they will have to face an above average defense that can counter their strengths. The Colts have always defended the pass well and are hard to attack deep downfield. This takes away a primary weapon in the Chargers passing game, the deep pass. The Chargers running game is not what it used to be, and in fact very far from it. It was their running game that gave the Colts problems in years past. This will not be the case today. The Chargers will have to rely on their air game to keep pace with the Colts offense. That means attacking the strength of the Colts defense.

Injuries: Injuries are one thing. Injuries that are not fully quantified into the line is another. That is what we are getting in this game. Injury returns are often underestimated. Sanders comes to mind. He was absent in a lot of games this year, which made the Colts defense appear less potent. He adds tremendous value to the Colts defense, especially in a game like this where their counterpart uses a lot of screen passes to the running backs and passes to the tight end. Sanders is the perfect antidote for Sproles in the passing game. Tomlinson is also an injury that is underestimated. If he plays, he will be limited by the injury that will hurt his cutting ability. Not good for his style of running and a Colts defense that uses aggressive run gap shoots. Tomlinson is not the player that can play through injuries well. Gates, also questionable and a game time decision. Saturday is healthy and playing. Not the case during their first meeting against the Chargers.

Homefield Advantage? Minimized. The Colts are savvy veterans that can now play anywhere. Especially a road game with nice weather. They were once a turf team. No longer can that be said. They finished with a better road record than the Chargers finished at home. The Chargers won five home games, tied with the worst out of any playoff team. That includes a one point home win against the Chiefs and an 0-3 home record against playoff teams.

Flight to quality? Both teams have been battle tested. The Chargers played nine teams with winning records. The Colts played 8 games with losing records. The other eight games, they lost just one. The Charger during those nine games? Won three of them.

Cons:
Peaking: The Chargers have always been known to peak late in the season. This year is no different. They are getting progressively better and still have a lot of upward mobility. They carry very similar traits to the Giants 2007 team.

Fundamentals: The Chargers have a top tier offense that can cause problems for any team. Their passing game is nearly impossible to stop, and the Colts pass defense is not shutdown. They lack big corners to counter the height of the Chargers receiving options. The injury to Brackett shifts the entire linebacking corpse to non ideal spots. If Tomlinson is a no-go, the drop-off to Sproles is less material than most people think. The main catalyst to the Colts offensive deficiencies is their offensive line, not their running back. Thus, Addai’s health is not a huge plus. Two Key injuries to the Colts offensive lineman is material and players who played during their first meeting against the Colts. Who didn’t play in that game? Castillo- a catalyst to their run defense and a player that can maximize the effects of those two injuries.

Special Teams: Big edge in coverage and returns skills goes to the Chargers. The Colts have always struggled covering kicks. This year is no different.

3-4 Defense: Not Manning’s favorite. Far from it.

Conclusion:
In the past, the Chargers posed problems for the Colts. Their pass rush from their 3-4 defense and their potent running game attacked the few Colts weakness. Both of these facets to the Chargers game is gone. The Chargers are not nearly the same threat to the Colts. The Chargers defense struggle getting off the field. So do the Colts offense. Expect this edge to quiet the crowd and keep the Chargers offense at bay. This should be a close game. I will take the team more accustomed to winning.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,835
Messages
13,573,882
Members
100,876
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com