Newsletters

Search

Let's go Brandon!
Handicapper
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
27,722
Reaction score
4,136
210zvvp.png
 

New member
Joined
Nov 12, 2016
Messages
116
Reaction score
8
Thanks for what you do Buzz !!! Look forward to William Hill each week.....
 

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
149
Reaction score
15
Yet ANOTHER winning day on this at 4-2. I never saw the NCAA one. Appreciate all your hard work and all who contribute in here. P.S if someone has the college William Hill please post.TIA
P.S. Okay just saw NCAA on a tweet, didn't realize they tweeted them. Wish I would have seen as I was depending on getting it in here. It went another ASTOUNDING 6-1 sweet
 

Let's go Brandon!
Handicapper
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
27,722
Reaction score
4,136
Mendoza Line cumulative year to date record through December 3:

Not every newsletter gets posted every week, and I'll try to note when the record doesn't include every week of the season.
Another note is that the grading is based on the line indicated in the newsletter at the time of publication, not the closing line. Many of these newsletters will claim a win against the best available line as it moves throughout the week, but these records reflect the outcome against the line they were willing to make a play on in their newsletter.
I put some of the extreme hot and cold plays in bold this week.
Lots of games where the line really mattered this week. Different outcomes for different newsletters this week. Some wins, losses, and pushes depending on the lines they used in both the Ohio State/Wisconsin game and the Stanford/USC game. Lots of pushes in the Memphis/UCF game. All have been graded based on the lines they used at their time of release.

CKO (No CKO this week. I think they're done for the season.)
11* (4-6-1)
10* (25-18)
Totals (9-11)

Marc Lawrence Playbook NCAA (Playbook plays tracked here went 1-6 overall this week)
5* (7-5-1)
4* (8-5)
3* (7-6)
Upset pick (4-9-1)
Betcha Didn't Know (10-8)
Awesome Angle (10-6)
Incredible Stat (5-8-1)

Marc Lawrence Playbook NFL
5* (8-5)
4* (4-9)
3* (3-10)

Pointwise NCAA
1* (14-10)
2* (9-3-1)
3* (4-10)
4* (9-19)
5* (16-11)

Pointwise NFL
3* (5-8)
4* (14-11-1)
5* (15-11)

PowerSweep NCAA
4* (3-9)
3* (12-13-2)
2* (19-9)
Underdog Play of the Week (6-6-1)
Tech Play of the Week (2-8)
Revenge Play of the Week (7-5-1)
Situational Play of the Week (3-7-1)
Series Play of the Week (6-5)

PowerSweep NFL
4* (9-4)
3* (9-3-1)
2* (6-7)
NFL System play (6-6-1)
4* Pro Angle (3-1)

Powers Picks NCAA
3* (6-17-1)
2* (20-19-2)
1* (2-1)

Powers Picks NFL
4* (0-1)
3* (4-6-1)
2* (14-12)
1* (0-0)

Sports Reporter
NCAA Super Best Bets (1-0-1)
NCAA Best Bets (22-29-2)
NFL Super Best Bets (0-1)
NFL Best Bets (12-12-1)

Red Sheet
89* (15-8-2)
88* (26-19-2)

Winning Points (went 4-0 overall this week)
NCAA 4* (3-10-1)
NCAA 3* (8-5-1)
NFL 4* (5-8)
NFL 3* (7-6)

Killer Sports, not including teasers
MTI 5* (2-0)
MTI 4.5* (10-2)
MTI 4* (5-7)
MTI 3* (0-0)
SBB 4.5* (4-0)
SBB 4* (8-14)

Victor Kings's Totals Tipsheet
3* (8-5)
2* (12-13-1)

PowerPlays
NCAA 4.5* (13-19-7)
NFL 4* (6-7)

Gold Sheet
NCAA Key Releases (27-24-2)
NFL Key Releases (18-20) (Pitt -6.5 pending for Monday night)

Last Year's Newsletter records
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
26,964
Reaction score
1,828
Yet ANOTHER winning day on this at 4-2. I never saw the NCAA one. Appreciate all your hard work and all who contribute in here. P.S if someone has the college William Hill please post.TIA

How are you getting 4-2? What, exactly, is the system here?
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
26,964
Reaction score
1,828
P.S. Okay just saw NCAA on a tweet, didn't realize they tweeted them. Wish I would have seen as I was depending on getting it in here. It went another ASTOUNDING 6-1 sweet

Since the 2 biggest bet favorites, FAU and Oklahoma (not to mention Clemson), won in blowouts, it seems impossible it went 6-1.

There seems to be a lot of making up records in this thread.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 12, 2016
Messages
116
Reaction score
8
Thanks Buzz, HILL IS THE MOST INTERESTING POST HERE........Thanks again
 

New member
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
62
Reaction score
1
Since the 2 biggest bet favorites, FAU and Oklahoma (not to mention Clemson), won in blowouts, it seems impossible it went 6-1.

There seems to be a lot of making up records in this thread.

Quit throwing all these facts around. These plays are as good as Marc Lawrence's NEVER EVER LOSS SINGLE BEST ANGLE PERFECT 3125-0 ATS RECORD GAME OF THE MILLENNIUM!!!!
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
23,830
Reaction score
3,634
Everyone can do what they want. I went and backchecked it and after about 80 plays I stopped. The record was slightly( and l mean very slightly like 40-35) profitable. But unless you are betting a big time money...IMO it is a waste of time. And if you are betting big time money...I wouldn't base anything on just money bet
 

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
232
Reaction score
26
Hey JHG103 ... you're absolutely correct. It seems like there are some in this space that are pushing certain handicappers etc with fake records.
Like I said before, if they don't post their picks after the game starts they're all BS. Don't fall for their scams.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
232
Reaction score
26
Hey Beerman, I've been fading Lawrence for three years now and the best 3 years I've ever had. He is HORRIBLE but in a good way because I fade him every week.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
149
Reaction score
15
Since the 2 biggest bet favorites, FAU and Oklahoma (not to mention Clemson), won in blowouts, it seems impossible it went 6-1.

There seems to be a lot of making up records in this thread.

Okay since you are calling me out. This is exactly why I avoid these forums anymore. I posted for four years on other side of the pond very successfully yet people. I don't think people in general, just gamblets are so negative. I figured I would come in here and give it a spin as I am a numbers pattern guy and IF you would have looked at my ORIGINAL PIST in here #4197 you would have seen EXACTLY how "I" use the William Hill Chart. You then would have seen I didnt want to confuse anyone but there was a BETTER way to utilize this. These forums should be about helping eachother out NOT lashing out negatively everytime onr gets a chance or has a losing week
 

New member
Joined
Jun 6, 2017
Messages
20,622
Reaction score
6
Thank you for all that you do Buzz Kill! Thankyou)(&
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
26,964
Reaction score
1,828
Okay since you are calling me out. This is exactly why I avoid these forums anymore. I posted for four years on other side of the pond very successfully yet people. I don't think people in general, just gamblets are so negative. I figured I would come in here and give it a spin as I am a numbers pattern guy and IF you would have looked at my ORIGINAL PIST in here #4197 you would have seen EXACTLY how "I" use the William Hill Chart. You then would have seen I didnt want to confuse anyone but there was a BETTER way to utilize this. These forums should be about helping eachother out NOT lashing out negatively everytime onr gets a chance or has a losing week

Ok, In post #4197 you say:

I take games where total money percentage is higher than ticket percentage on same team and bet them 17-14 this week..

So, looking at the NFL games this week where that is the criteria you get:

Vikings (W)
Broncos (L)
Titans (W)
Jags (W)
Rams (W)
Chargers (L)

That gets you to 4-2.

In NCAA, the games would be:

UL Monroe (L)
FAU (W)
OKL (W)
GA So (L)
App St (W)
NM State (L)
Clemson (W)

For 4-3

So how did you get to 6-1?

I'm not trying to bash you. I'm merely trying to get to reality.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
149
Reaction score
15
Ok, In post #4197 you say:



So, looking at the NFL games this week where that is the criteria you get:

Vikings (W)
Broncos (L)
Titans (W)
Jags (W)
Rams (W)
Chargers (L)

That gets you to 4-2.

In NCAA, the games would be:

UL Monroe (L)
FAU (W)
OKL (W)
GA So (L)
App St (W)
NM State (L)
Clemson (W)

For 4-3

So how did you get to 6-1?

I'm not trying to bash you. I'm merely trying to get to reality.
I stand corrected,sorry about that. I didn't try to make it something it wasnt I had ULMonroe on teaser and won so mistakenly thought they covered and NMSU I had final score 42-17 don't know where I got that from. My apologies still winning week but DEFINITELY not 6-1
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,138,359
Messages
13,870,629
Members
104,502
Latest member
sexymust
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com