New Yahoo News/YouGov poll: Most Americans say Trump is a 'racist' and want him to stop tweeting

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
So is it 100 million pimple face? We have about 330 million in the country so most must be a real lot. What is the number tough guy. Stop the gibberish and post the facts or shut the fuck up.

No, I don't think I will. You just got left with cum on you chin, I'm not gonna do your work for you, go read the article carefully, you stupid ****-and, it's obvious that you don't know how polling works. Stick an acid covered dildo up your ass and grow a brain, Scumbag.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
6,835
Tokens
So 1,060 adults in a country of 330 million is most of America huh?

Let me guess you failed math?

What an absolute fuckin MORON!!!!!!

Epic fail pimple face!!!
:pointer:
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
6,835
Tokens
Dafool would be a more fitting name. Go gobble up some more yahoo drippings you moron
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
So 1,060 adults in a country of 330 million is most of America huh?

Let me guess you failed math?

What an absolute fuckin MORON!!!!!!

Epic fail pimple face!!!
:pointer:

Ohhhhhhhhh, Light Dawns on Marble Head...YOURS. You FINALLY were able to figure out the polling figures, huh? Like I said, you obviously don't have a fucking clue how polls work. And, speak UP, bitch, which poll do YOU follow (don't tell me, lemme guess...it's one that you agree with, lol), you gutless twat?
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
6,835
Tokens
It doesn’t get any fuckin dumber than your ass. Pack up your pimples and take your dumb ass to school for starters. If people could buy stocks in stupidity you would own every share right now. Idiot!
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
It doesn’t get any fuckin dumber than your ass. Pack up your pimples and take your dumb ass to school for starters. If people could buy stocks in stupidity you would own every share right now. Idiot!

Hmmm, I don't see any answers to which poll you follow, which, obviously means, you don't have one, or you're too stupid to figure how large a sample it taken. And, if you don't care about my opinion, that why are you flapping your gums multiple times in a thread I started, you brainless putz? STFU and lick the scum off of a dead dog's dick, douchebag.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
6,835
Tokens
I don’t care about polls you fuckin retard. If I believed them, Clinton would be President right now. Try thinking for yourself moron. Just avoid any and all math because your dumbass sucks at it
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,167
Tokens
I know EXACTLY how many people were polled, you fucking moron-it's shown within a link in the article, but you're so busy trying to be a wise guy, when, you are in fact, an idiot, you didn't notice. If you CARE so little, you brain dead nitwit, then why the fuck are you running your mouth multiple times in this thread????

JESUS, you guys are stupid! At least I haven't heard in a long while from the schmuck who grandly entered a thread I started to tell me that he was putting me on ignore.:ohno:Loser!@#0face)(*^%

I have a solid minor in statistics in college which includes probability based on the two key words of any sampling techniques-the words

are "validity" and "reliability."

Even though in 2016 the sampling didn't predict the winner because of the Electoral College, they were pretty damn accurate is predicting that Hillary would

win the popular vote by 2-3 million votes.

I just did a little bit of research on the internet re: how many people are needed to accurately predict the results of a Presidential Election with a margin

of error of above 3%.

And as I suspected a sample size of around 1000 is all that is needed to accurately predict the results of a Presidential Election involving millions of

people AS LONG AS IT IS A RANDOM SAMPLE REPRESENTING THE POPULACE AS A WHOLE OF THOSE WHO ARE MOST LIKELY TO VOTE.

I understand that this concept might be difficult to believe for those who don't have education and/or experience in this area.

However with rare exceptions such as in 2016, sampling techniques today are highly sophisticated and quite accurate.

That is why in fact both political parties rely on them so much with their own internal polling.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
6,835
Tokens
Hmmm, I don't see any answers to which poll you follow, which, obviously means, you don't have one, or you're too stupid to figure how large a sample it taken. And, if you don't care about my opinion, that why are you flapping your gums multiple times in a thread I started, you brainless putz? STFU and lick the scum off of a dead dog's dick, douchebag.

I’m here to call your dumb pimple faced ass out for being the ignorant, brain dead moron that you are

1,060 people in a country of 330 million is most of America huh? You are nothing but a blowhard with an agenda and it felt good to embarrass your dumbass and those numbers in this thread. Suck it snowflake
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
I don’t care about polls you fuckin retard. If I believed them, Clinton would be President right now. Try thinking for yourself moron. Just avoid any and all math because your dumbass sucks at it

Man, there's a min-course in evidence of one dumb bastard:

Sentence one: who gives a fuck what you believe it, Jagoff? And, you're showing just how stupid you are by implying that YOU know more than 70 odd years of pollsters, which is so stupid, you should be embarrassed to express the view in public...only, you're WAY too stupid to be embarrassed.

Sentence two: What does the first part of the sentence have to do with the 2nd part of the sentence? The answer: nothing whatsover, but, there's a good reason for that: YOU'RE A FUCKING MORON.

Sentence three: Look in the mirror when you say that, you brain dead putz, and read savage1's post that preceded this one. It's almost certainly too late for an idiot like you to educate yourself, but, hey, ya never know.

Sentence four: Again, you haven't a clue what you're talking about, YOU know better than professional pollsters, ROTFLMAO!!!!!
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
I have a solid minor in statistics in college which includes probability based on the two key words of any sampling techniques-the words

are "validity" and "reliability."

Even though in 2016 the sampling didn't predict the winner because of the Electoral College, they were pretty damn accurate is predicting that Hillary would

win the popular vote by 2-3 million votes.

I just did a little bit of research on the internet re: how many people are needed to accurately predict the results of a Presidential Election with a margin

of error of above 3%.

And as I suspected a sample size of around 1000 is all that is needed to accurately predict the results of a Presidential Election involving millions of

people AS LONG AS IT IS A RANDOM SAMPLE REPRESENTING THE POPULACE AS A WHOLE OF THOSE WHO ARE MOST LIKELY TO VOTE.

I understand that this concept might be difficult to believe for those who don't have education and/or experience in this area.

However with rare exceptions such as in 2016, sampling techniques today are highly sophisticated and quite accurate.

That is why in fact both political parties rely on them so much with their own internal polling.

Dead on savage1: https://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2019/11/14/with-so-many-political-polls-why-are-so-few-people-called/

With So Many Political Polls, Why Are So Few People Called?


By Heather BrownNovember 14, 2019 at 10:03 pmFiled Under:Good Question, Heather Brown, Local TV



MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) — With the presidential primaries just a few months away, expect to hear a lot about political polls.
Jon from Pequot Lakes emailed WCCO wanting to know: If there are so many polls, why hasn’t he been called? Good Question.
“The answer is we talk to someone just like you,” said Anthony Salvanto, director of Elections and Surveys for CBS News. “We talk with someone who is similar enough to you in the way they would have answered the question that they would represent you.”

Pollsters use a sample of the population to determine the estimate of Americans’s opinions on any number of topics. Salvanto says 1,000 people surveyed is a good benchmark. It’s essential for accuracy that the sampling include differences based on age, race, education, region and political leanings.

“The mechanism of how that works is that the people you talk to when you put together this little microcosm of the state or country represent others like them,” he said.
Some polling is done with phone calls, where the numbers are randomly generated by a computer. According to Pew Research, the response rate has fallen to 6% for phone surveys. That means a pollster would have to call almost 17,000 people to get 1,000 to answer a phone survey.
“We are calling cellphones, but it’s easy for a cellphone to go to voicemail,” Salvanto said. “That’s one of the challenges for telephone polling.”
More and more polling is no happening online, where people can sign up with polling companies for online panels to answer survey questions. For CBS News’ October Battleground Tracker poll, pollster YouGov surveyed 16,500 registered voters online over 18 states.
“The convenience is important in getting a cross section of people,” Salvanto said.
But, as for why Jon from Pequot Lakes hasn’t been called, Pew Research answered that question. They calculate that each American over 18 has a 1 in 160,000 chance for getting called for any of their polls. Even in there are thousands of polls every year, the chances are still pretty small.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
6,835
Tokens
Keep babbling you fuckin fool

1,060 people —-> MOST OF AMERICA

You are just another clueless dumb fuck who knows nothing about math or reality

Most of America

FUCKIN MORON!!!
:pointer:
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Keep babbling you fuckin fool

1,060 people —-> MOST OF AMERICA

You are just another clueless dumb fuck who knows nothing about math or reality

Most of America

FUCKIN MORON!!!
:pointer:


Let's see, who knows more about polling between these two:

Anthony Salvanto Director of Elections and Surveys, CBS



Salvanto_Anthony.jpg






Anthony Salvanto, PhD, is CBS News Director of Elections and Surveys. He currently conducts all polling across the nation, states, and congressional races, and heads the Decision Desk that projects outcomes on Election Nights. He appears regularly on Face the Nation, the CBS Evening News, CBS This Morning, and more. Where Did You Get This Number? is his first book.



OR...

The Psychic...

Gee, I'm gonna have sleep on THAT one...:pointer:Shush()*:think2::hahahahah:laughingbSlapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^:hahahahahazzkick(&^
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
6,835
Tokens
1,000 people surveyed is a good benchmark. lol

Typical pimple faced libtard. Pound the keyboard and internet until I find someone who agrees. You are a fuckin fraud and more importantly, a total fuckin moron


il_794xN.1752845343_mwiz.jpg
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
1,000 people surveyed is a good benchmark. lol

Typical pimple faced libtard. Pound the keyboard and internet until I find someone who agrees. You are a fuckin fraud and more importantly, a total fuckin moron


il_794xN.1752845343_mwiz.jpg

et's see, who knows more about polling between these two:

Anthony Salvanto Director of Elections and Surveys, CBS



Salvanto_Anthony.jpg






Anthony Salvanto, PhD, is CBS News Director of Elections and Surveys. He currently conducts all polling across the nation, states, and congressional races, and heads the Decision Desk that projects outcomes on Election Nights. He appears regularly on Face the Nation, the CBS Evening News, CBS This Morning, and more. Where Did You Get This Number? is his first book.



OR...

The Psychic...

Gee, I'm gonna have sleep on THAT one...:pointer:Shush()*:think2::hahahahah:laughingbSlapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^:hahahahah
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
6,835
Tokens
Hey moron, nobody gives a shit who you blow for your polling information. None of those people are calling 1,060 people MOST OF AMERICA

Only you are

You are truly a waste of space and the biggest pimple faced moron here. Much dumber than first thought. You just don’t get it. I am not surprised though. Most math retards like you struggle in life. The internet makes you feel smart but intelligence is clearly lacking
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Hey moron, nobody gives a shit who you blow for your polling information. None of those people are calling 1,060 people MOST OF AMERICA

Only you are

You are truly a waste of space and the biggest pimple faced moron here. Much dumber than first thought. You just don’t get it. I am not surprised though. Most math retards like you struggle in life. The internet makes you feel smart but intelligence is clearly lacking


Once again, If you CARE so little, you brain dead nitwit, then why the fuck are you running your mouth multiple times in this thread???? Why won't you answer that, you gutless cocksucker?

And, AGAIN, the fact that you claim, that YOU, an obvious nitwit, know more than hundreds of polling professional organizations, that have been around for scores of years, shows that you are a fucking moron, probably the result of inbreeding. Speaking of which, go fuck your mother.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
6,835
Tokens
And once again I answered that question in post 29 moron. Pop some pimples and drain some blood from your face. Maybe you can focus again after that and actually read the thread.

You are a pathetic attention seeking retard that knows nothing about math or intelligence

Your mom has probably been with more people. You wouldn’t call that most of America would you?

Pathetic, ignorant, moron
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
And once again I answered that question in post 29 moron. Pop some pimples and drain some blood from your face. Maybe you can focus again after that and actually read the thread.

You are a pathetic attention seeking retard that knows nothing about math or intelligence

Your mom has probably been with more people. You wouldn’t call that most of America would you?

Pathetic, ignorant, moron


Lol, if you think that YOU are gonna change my opinion, or my behavior, in ANY way, shape, or form, then, you're even dumber than I thought you are, which is saying something. Secondly, you keep saying that I said something that was said by yahoo, but, obviously, you don't understand polling, despite savage1's excellent post and the one I posted by Salvanto. But YOU know better than all those sources. Once again, ladies and gents, let the river of stupidity by "The Psychic," WASH over you: Who knows more?

Anthony Salvanto Director of Elections and Surveys, CBS



Salvanto_Anthony.jpg






Anthony Salvanto, PhD, is CBS News Director of Elections and Surveys. He currently conducts all polling across the nation, states, and congressional races, and heads the Decision Desk that projects outcomes on Election Nights. He appears regularly on Face the Nation, the CBS Evening News, CBS This Morning, and more. Where Did You Get This Number? is his first book.



OR...

The Psychic...

Gee, I'm gonna have sleep on THAT one...:pointer:Shush()*:think2::hahahahah:laughingbSlapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
6,835
Tokens
The only thing I would change about you involves your mom. She should have swallowed instead

1,060 = MOST OF AMERICA

Fuckin MORON
:pointer:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,117,953
Messages
13,549,696
Members
100,549
Latest member
apptaixiuonl
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com