New system

Search

ham

New member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
1,359
Tokens
I forget the official record last year, but for a good 10 or so weeks, it never had a losing week. It was always 2-1 or 4-3, etc. Once you hit that tipping point, where you're in the positive, that's the end of the week for this system. It's not based on greed.

Plays for tonight...

Lakers -14
Portland +6
Thunder +10
T-Wolves +5.5
 

Striving towards handicapping perfection...
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
2,726
Tokens
I forget the official record last year, but for a good 10 or so weeks, it never had a losing week. It was always 2-1 or 4-3, etc. Once you hit that tipping point, where you're in the positive, that's the end of the week for this system. It's not based on greed.


What's the system?...I can back-track it with my database...
 

ham

New member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
1,359
Tokens
What's the system?...I can back-track it with my database...

Well, I don't really have a name for the system...

Anyhoo, I just searched the database for some of my old threads. Turns out I quit posting due to the lack of reception. Nobody really cared. I only have the records of the first five weeks...

Week 1
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=556888

Week 2
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=559894

Week 3
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=562092

Week 4
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=565915

Week 5
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=568054
 

ham

New member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
1,359
Tokens
Missed Portland on a layup. :ohno:

Lakers -14
Portland +6
Thunder +10
T-Wolves +5.5

Record is 2-2, so far.
 

RX Sophomore
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
503
Tokens
aside from our other thread fun, i don't understand something with this system. how you pick the games is unknown, which is fine, secrets aren't secrets if everyone knows them. but the structuring of the rules you've divulged thus far, particularly the "once you're positive, the week is over" rule, where did that come from? weeks one and two from last year had multiple continued plays above the 50% mark and then that just stopped with no real explanation(shown in the listed threads anyway) i was just wondering why the change of strategy. from what i know of wagering on sports, there are different groups of bettors; the hometown team loyalists, the pure statistical cappers, the trend gurus, etc. another thing i've recognized is that everyone has streaks, both good and bad. what starts/ends these streaks, i figure, is one of two things. the bettor changes, id est, they get more/less emotional, they cap under different circumstances or any one of a million possibilities; OR the game/other side changes, aka vegas adjusts, schedule variations, weather, etc, just something within the game that the bettor didn't account for because they had been winning, so why change things. so why would you kill the possibility of a potential "hot streak" starting every single week? in all honesty, there is no gambling or wagering or whatever you like to call it without some amount of greed, so i agree with limiting or at least attempting to control it, as it can have negative affects on a person's decision making. however, if the object is to win, why stop whenever the winning gets going? over the extreme long run, given a steady/consistent practice of picking, most if not all bettors will end up at 50% or extremely close to it (why bookies make money) and i highly doubt there'll never be a week where the system doesn't get to that positive mark, so by stopping short when winning and riding on when losing, aren't you dooming yourself to a less than 50% mark in the end?
maybe there's something i've misunderstood, but if not, i suppose my question is, how can this system be expected to be profitable? it almost appears to be a stretched out version of the basic martingale system based on an arbitrary time line, in this case, a week. if it does work for you, congratulations, im sure everyone on this board who actually plays the game knows, truly working systems are hard to come across.
 

ham

New member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
1,359
Tokens
maybe there's something i've misunderstood, but if not, i suppose my question is, how can this system be expected to be profitable? it almost appears to be a stretched out version of the basic martingale system based on an arbitrary time line, in this case, a week. if it does work for you, congratulations, im sure everyone on this board who actually plays the game knows, truly working systems are hard to come across.

It's not the martingale, because you're not chasing games, and you're not trying to recover money. With martingale, you multiply your bets, and it gets dangerous, very fast. This is not martingale. Whether you wanna follow, is up to you. I'm not trying to sell anyone on my picks. I'm not a tout.
 

ham

New member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
1,359
Tokens
4-4

It would've gone 5-4, if I had posted the Chicago +4.5 bet. For some odd reason, I just listed two bets, whereas everywhere else, I posted all three. Mind lapse, but I'll keep it real.

Today's bets...

NJ +6.5
MIA +9
CHI +3
POR -8.5
 

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
766
Tokens
i would love to find a profitiable system, but what is the system?

also, brewer, do you know the results of playing against road teams when they are in a 3 in 4 night situation. i thought this would be profitable, but quit in the negative bout 2/3 into last season. i guess it cant be that easy.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,983
Messages
13,575,755
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com