New Push To Ban Online Gambling By Scum Sheldon Adelson

[The Guesser]

The Citizens United case once again bites US in the ass. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/28/u...-to-ban-online-gambling.html?hpw&rref=us&_r=0

 

[carlspackler]

Agree.

Finally there is common ground between me and my US Senators.

 

[guitarjosh]

Adelson, and way to many other people, is for smaller government until boatloads of other peoples' money is waved in his face.

 

[akphidelt]

One of the few instances I agree with the libertarians!! If people want to gamble with their money, let them gamble!!

 

[The Guesser]

Adelson, and way to many other people, is for smaller government until boatloads of other peoples' money is waved in his face.

It's called Blatant Hypocrisy. We MUST get big money contributions and lobbyists out of the Government. It was happening to a degree, thanks to McCain-Feingold, until the horrid, Citizens United ruling, unleashed the Adelson's, Soros's and Koch's of the World to throw their huge money with no restraint, and pull strings of the gutless, corrupt Politicians. Gov Christie should be ashamed of himself begging this asshole for money, considering the inroads NJ is making in Online Gaming.

 

[SheriffJoe]

The bigger the government, the more powerful the lobbyists and the smaller the citizens.

 

[guitarjosh]

It's called Blatant Hypocrisy. We MUST get big money contributions and lobbyists out of the Government. It was happening to a degree, thanks to McCain-Feingold, until the horrid, Citizens United ruling, unleashed the Adelson's, Soros's and Koch's of the World to throw their huge money with no restraint, and pull strings of the gutless, corrupt Politicians. Gov Christie should be ashamed of himself begging this asshole for money, considering the inroads NJ is making in Online Gaming.

Do you also feel that way about unions?

 

[The Guesser]

Do you also feel that way about unions?

Of course. And Corporations. Only small contributions should be allowed. My ideal would cap it at $100 per individual/entity.

 

[Acebb]

This has nothing to do with Citizens United.

 

[Acebb]

Why would any politician support this other than to take campaign $ from Anderson?

It isn't as if there are a bunch of people that will rush to the polls to vote on this issue.

 

[The Guesser]

This has nothing to do with Citizens United.

"Why would any politician support this other than to take campaign $ from Anderson?"

The liar contradicts himself. His endeavor to be just as stupid as Wrong Way continues on a successful course.

 

[Acebb]

"Why would any politician support this other than to take campaign $ from Anderson?"

The liar contradicts himself. His endeavor to be just as stupid as Wrong Way continues on a successful course.

Hey idiot: Prior to Citizens United it was legal to donate money to campaigns and PACs. It was also perfectly legal to run endless campaign or issue ads.

Thanks for participating, moron.

 

[BleedingPurple]

I know the locals will be happy. One local told me his business has dropped over 50% in recent years. I told him that's partly because you screw your customers, kind of pist him off