NROG said:
It is understood that we will meet much resistance in this fight. Not only from the politicians and industries supporting a ban, but also from those like "The Wise One" and Slotech that simply wish for a better world without laws and regulations. Small government is beautiful. But while a lawless world may seem swell, NROG will move forward with our fight and respectfully disagree with that mentality. No action=No Gambling Online. That's a FACT and it simply something we are not willing to accept.
Let's NOT be confused here...
"The Wise One"
NEVER indicated that the world would be better WITHOUT laws and regulations...let alone mention anything about how "swell a lawless world" may be...unfortunately, these are interpretations, perceptions, exaggerations fabricated by NROG.
So let's clearify:
The Wise One, has three views of Government intervention with regard to social gaming commerce:
1. Government can profit from social gaming commerce, while controlling it with laws, taxes and regulations.
2. Government can assume the costs associated with attempting to prohibit social gaming commerce.
3. Government can ignore social gaming commerce.
Now, which is the BEST OVERALL OPTION for ALL participants becomes the question...of which the "Wise One" indicates to be #3 (FREE TRADE) regarding the gaming commerce issue...not to be extrapolated into some kind of "lawless world" confusion by NROG.
Let's further clarify that
"The Wise One" supports FREE TRADE, including ALL resistance to ADDITIONAL LAWS, REGUALTIONS and TAXES upon social commerce...which unfortunately includes those proposed by NROG, while viewing NROG as an organization predicated upon its own self-interest and not that of the American gaming consumer by suggestion view #1 above to be the best option for our American gaming consumer.
In
international trade,
free trade is an idealized
market model, often stated as a political objective, wherein trade of goods and services between countries flows unhindered by government-imposed artificial costs. Intellectually, this arrangement is supported by followers of the neoclassical and microeconomic schools of thought. It is opposed by
anti-globalization and
labour due to perceived tendencies for abuse by wealthier states.
The term is given to economic policies, as well as political parties that support increases in such trade.
Free trade is a concept in
economics and
government, encompassing:
- International trade of goods without tariffs (taxes on imports) or other trade barriers (e.g., quotas on imports)
- International trade in services without tariffs or other trade barriers
- The free movement of labour between countries
- The free movement of capital between countries
- The absence of trade-distorting policies (such as taxes, subsidies, regulations or laws) that give domestic firms, households or factors of production an advantage over foreign ones
- Trade-distorting policies to enforce property rights so as to ensure the above conditions