What a dumb bitch. Perfect example of many of the
kids in higher education today. Clueless at best.
So have Cavuto's. He should've explained to her the reason college is really so expensive and whose fault it is.
Higher Education could absolutely be 75% cheaper and higher quality tomorrow.
It is better for the government and higher ed that she has no clue what she is talking about, because if she did then a lot of overpaid cronies would be screwed.
I don't see a lot of "overpaid cronies" except for athletic coaches and athletic directors...who, at the end of the day provide a bit of profit for the schools. The biggest problem with College is athletics...there is an unreasonable amount of money spent to attract the best athletes. CUt all these big sports and make them semi-pro leagues.
School admin budgets are over the top and have been swelling in size for 30 years. University presidents are some of the highest paid employees in the state. When you have the government subsidizing the cost of education it just leads to higher costs. Since 1980, the cost of education has gone up 3-5x faster than inflation.
The entire model is cronyism. Why don't they just compete like businesses in other industries? You really think the free market cost for a Psych 101 class is 4500 bucks? That 2yr rote curriculum stuff would cost next to nothing. Especially given how we can leverage technology now.
Then there is the accreditation process where they try to make it harder so they can keep their monopoly.
The entire industry is socialism/cronyism at the expense of taxpayers.
And ontop of all that, the product kinda sucks these days. As you can see in that interview....
What I don't understand is the philosophy that by being in the 1% that means you should pay more in taxes. That's never sat well with me.
Because you make more money, you should pay more than the average joe?
Why isn't a flat percentage fair across the board?
I agree....too much building, too many facilities, too much trying to keep up with the others. Seems to be more about building the endowment than educating students.
He tried explaining to her what was up. He used simple math for the last minute.The "oh look little girl, you think everything should be free...how do you want to pay for it? hahahahaha" approach can be entertaining, if he explained to her what was up it would be a lot better for everyone though.
I mean that's great for him he can outdebate a 19 year old that probably spent her weekend having the glee club run train on her, but it ain't solving any problems anytime soon.
What I don't understand is the philosophy that by being in the 1% that means you should pay more in taxes. That's never sat well with me.
Because you make more money, you should pay more than the average joe?
Why isn't a flat percentage fair across the board?
If a psych 101 class didn't cost 4500 bucks then you would go a long way towards improving social mobility.Because the rich get richer and people making less money have almost no shot to ever gain wealth. All the money would stay in the same familys forever.