Need Help/Opinion

[Birdman]

Placed wager at a sportsbook on NOV 12 for Arizona to win Pac 10 (exact wording)"ODDS TO WIN PAC 10 ARIZONA +100"

Am being told this was for PAC 10 tourney. To me this is ludicrous or am I wrong. There is no wording of tourney or reg season yet who would put up conf tourney odds in Nov that were based on consensus pre season team projections.

Customer service at sportsbook was professional but unwilling to even consider my logic behind wager. Again, maybe I have no clue.

 

[michael777]

seems to me that you are right

 

[Fishhead]

You definetly have a case here.

Please shoot me an email at STRUTNUT@AOL.COM and I can possibly assist you in getting this resolved.

---FISH---

 

[JimFiestSux]

Did they have any other torney odds up at that time for any other divisions?? No way they would post a torney line that early. You won your wager and should've been credited minutes after they won the Pac 10. You are being ripped off. NAME THAT BOOK!

 

[5teamparlay]

IS this part of a grouping of bets. Maybe they are updated daily. AS odds big east Notre Dame taken down, Rutgers still up and others adjusted this morn would obviously show a 'tourny intent'. Or were odds still available in the last week for teams elimated from regular season contention but could still win their tourney.

 

[5teamparlay]

When i go to SB. com the odds read like this


Conference Tournaments <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>

• Atlantic 10
• ACC
• Big 10
• Big 12
• Big East
• Conference USA
• Mountain West
• Pac 10
• SEC

once inside like this:


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Odds to win PAC 10 Conference Championship
Mar 12, 2005 04:00 pm ET

 

[5teamparlay]

The copy and paste isn't working completely but adding, the date of march 12 is important as to intent and all tehse bet read:

Odds to win PAC 10 Conference Championship
Mar 12, 2005 04:00 pm ET

in regards to the conference tournament at this book. BTW ND was down in big east odds.