1: 230-198 +12.25
2: 123-94 +39.90
3: 1-1 -.30
overall: 354-293 +51.85
NIT: I'm pretty sure most of you are aware of the experimental rule changes of the NIT.
1. 3 pt line moved back 20 inches
2. Shot clock on off reb set to 20 secs
3. wider ft lane,
4. 10 min quarters, with 5 fould resulting in 2 ft's,
Briefly for me: thinking outside the box
more 3 attempts, longer rebs, equal fast breaks, wider posting area for the bigs, more shot attempts because of shot clock rest to 20 secs instead of 30 after off reb, no more 1 and 1 misses, automatic 2 ft shots, for me college players and coaches turning their players loose more than normal for some more fun and wanting them to be happy, rewarding them after a grueling season,
other words I'm taking a shot at higher scoring, obviously from the higher totals the experts are also expecting higher scores,
sucker me in, but I'm trying out these 3 games:
554 WK/BC over 160 -110 (1)
556 Okl St/FGC over 159 (1)
558 ND/Hamp over 153 (1)
2: 123-94 +39.90
3: 1-1 -.30
overall: 354-293 +51.85
NIT: I'm pretty sure most of you are aware of the experimental rule changes of the NIT.
1. 3 pt line moved back 20 inches
2. Shot clock on off reb set to 20 secs
3. wider ft lane,
4. 10 min quarters, with 5 fould resulting in 2 ft's,
Briefly for me: thinking outside the box
more 3 attempts, longer rebs, equal fast breaks, wider posting area for the bigs, more shot attempts because of shot clock rest to 20 secs instead of 30 after off reb, no more 1 and 1 misses, automatic 2 ft shots, for me college players and coaches turning their players loose more than normal for some more fun and wanting them to be happy, rewarding them after a grueling season,
other words I'm taking a shot at higher scoring, obviously from the higher totals the experts are also expecting higher scores,
sucker me in, but I'm trying out these 3 games:
554 WK/BC over 160 -110 (1)
556 Okl St/FGC over 159 (1)
558 ND/Hamp over 153 (1)