My Proposal to WSEX

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
285
Tokens
You have my money so inevitably you have the final say on how you want to handle this. I do not want a mediator. I just want what is fair to all parties involved.

My Requests:

1. Update your rules to clarify the limits per sport and/or per bet explicitly.

2. Hire someone to monitor your lines 24/7 or fix your software to correctly adjust for the amount of exposure you are willing to accept at a given price.

3. Be 100% honest and tell me and everyone in this forum exactly how the bets would have been graded if they had lost.

4. Take the amount you would have deducted from my account had the bets lost and pay me on that at +120. I want to be paid on the total amount I had at risk at the fair price I was offered. When I say AT RISK that is what I mean. If I was only risking $500 that is all I want to be paid based on. If I placed the bets at +120 that is what I want to be paid based on as well.

If you don’t want my action at your book because you think I am too sharp I can accept that. If you want to limit my wager amounts, I can accept that also. I may not like it but that is your decision as the book.

Revere14
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,026
Tokens
Too sharp????????????????????????????

ROTFLMAO

yea a real sharp guy torches an out so he can make a few bucks laying off money to where?

Betfair?

how many neteller accounts do you have? how many are active and how many are frozen?

better question is exactly how you figure to get down when your name PF(not a bad guess is it little piggy?) is given to every book on earth?

You phucked too many people this time pal. You know us folks that knew WSEX is the slowest moving soccer book in the world, you know us folks that can control themselves so the apple is there for a bite tomorrow.

30+ books in my stable, and you better hope my guess at your id is wrong, but given PF's history, this has your name written all over it.

[This message was edited by Sodium Pentethol V on August 25, 2003 at 01:52 PM.]
 

I GRIN WHEN I WIN
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,623
Tokens
I AM ANXIOUSLY WAITING THERE ANSWER TO QUESTION #3 THIS OUGHT TO BE GOOD.SURE WE WOULD HAVE RETURNED YOUR 39,500 DOLLARS
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,128
Tokens
"If you don’t want my action at your book because you think I am too sharp I can accept that"

I second the ROTFLMFAO!!!!!Now bend over and give yourself a blowjob Revere 14. A real RAZORBLADE you are PLEEEEEEEZE do not embarass the sharp players in this forum by trying to pass yourself off as one. 80+ BETS AT VARIOUS LIMITS AT 4:00AM IN THE MORNING! Sharp......NOT... GREEDY SCUMBAG....YES!!!
 

New member
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,949
Tokens
dicky and sodium........


the bet made at Wsex was made to take advantage of a situation......he is a scammer.....

guys like this dont wake up one morning and decide to pull a stunt like this............


my money would be on "i bet he has done this before" in some form.....


check his oil.......
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
678
Tokens
Revere,there is no use of asking hypothetical questions.
btw,would you tell why did you like so much MU to win?Curiocity killed the cat and I m having a near-death experience since yesterday
icon_biggrin.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
169
Tokens
Say what you want, but those are 4 very reasonable requests. Especially #4!
 

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
Revere14,

My proposal to you is to contact either WSEX or myself IMMEDIATELY before I blow the whistle on everything I know that you did wrong...

I would hate to have to do that because it is NOT my style...

WSEX will HONOR the bets but unless you contact one of us ASAP, it will not be to you...

This is my last post asking you to do so...

Ken
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,128
Tokens
kerry
Are you a thief that justify's your actions by blaming others? Or are you just embarrased that you thought you were defending a honest player that turned out to be a scam artist?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
980
Tokens
Revere,
Are you sober? This is the wrong way to go about this. Things were looking good and you shoot yourself in the head. Why can't you call and talk to someone? Are you nuts?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
169
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by DickyW:
kerry
Are you a thief that justify's your actions by blaming others? Or are you just embarrased that you thought you were defending a honest player that turned out to be a scam artist?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I am definitely not a thief, not embarrassed, and never thought that I was defending an "honest" player. However, I did consider the facts presented and IMO WSEX should have to honor the bet. Nothing more than that!
 

Born Again Gambler
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,677
Tokens
Yup.... Homeboy was playing with fraudalent money in the first place. Why isn't he stepping up and answering the charges brought against him by the Shrink and WSEX? If I lost 40 thousand I would be fighting this like crazy.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
334
Tokens
DICKYW WHY IS HE A SCAM PLAYER BECAUSE HE HAS LOTS OF MONEY PLACED HIS BETS AND WON COME ON NOW DICKY YOU KNOW DAMN WELL THIS GUY SHOULD BE PAID NO ANDS IFS OR BUTS ABOUT IT SO WHAT IF NETTELLER CLOSED HIS ACCOUNT MANY BOOKIES DONT USE REAL NAMES EITHER I WONDER WHY
icon_rolleyes.gif
WHO CARES IF HIS EMAIL ADDY IS WRONG WHO CARES IF HE DOESNT LIVE THERE HE STILL HAD MONEY IN THE BOOK RIGHT MAYBE HE IS SCARED OF THE PAT ACT THATS WHY HE USED A PROXY IM SURE HE HAS HIS REASONS JUST LIKE MOST BOOKIES HAVE REASONS WHY THEY DONT USE THEIR REAL NAMES TOO ITS A TWO WAY STREET IF THIS GUY NEVER RIPPED OFF WSEX IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM THEN THE ONLY THING THAT WILL MAKE THIS RIGHT IS IF THIS REVERE GUY WHOEVER HE IS GETS PAID ANYTHING LESS IS A RIPOFF ITS NOT LIKE HES DONE ANYTHING DIFFERENT THAN MANY OTHERS HERE HE PLAYED HE WON HE SHOULD GET PAID PERIOD STEVE IF YOUR READING THIS YOU SHOULD DO THE RIGHT THING PAY THE MAN REVERE DONT TAKE ANYTHING LESS THAN WHAT IS OWED TO YOU IN CLOSING I WILL SAY THAT ALL BOOKS HAVE PROBLEMS ONE WAY OR ANOTHER WITH SOMETHING OR SOMEONE BUT WSEX IS A TOP TIER BOOK THAT IM SURE WILL DO THE RIGHT THING
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,128
Tokens
Pipe

"COME ON NOW DICKY YOU KNOW DAMN WELL THIS GUY SHOULD BE PAID NO ANDS IFS OR BUTS ABOUT IT"

Sorry buddy I disagree and I have documented why in NUMEROUS threads. I don't defend thiefs and never will. I could care less if they rob a bank or steal a pack of gum.

"WHO CARES IF HIS EMAIL ADDY IS WRONG WHO CARES IF HE DOESNT LIVE THERE "

I hope your not saying it is OK to committ fraud and OK for a book to participate in it

Stay tuned Pipe I am sure there is much more. I also am sure some posters will find more things to justify him stealing
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,412
Tokens
Congratulations Revere on one hell of a classy attitude and offer.

This is really the only solution and you hit it on the head.

Only Steve knows what the truth is on question number 4 and you are challenging him to be honest with himself. Anyone who has been on this planet a while knows that it is in Steve's interest to be totally truthful because he is going to have to look himself in the mirror for years to come.

The fairest solution is the one which retroactively gave you a line of exactly +120, not + a zillion or - a zillion or anything in between. And only Steve knows what that amount is.

And your other comments are also in everyone's interest since they serve to improve the site.

It's amazing to me that someone can be so dumb to get into such a situation in the first place yet come up with such a brilliant proposal to get out of it.

Congratulations again and good luck!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
334
Tokens
THERES NO FRAUD HERE DICKY HES NOT STEALING DICKY THE GUY BET WITH HIS OWN MONEY AND WON
THATS THE PROBLEM THESE DAYS SOMEONE GETS A GOOD HIT THEN PEOPLE DONT LIKE TO SEE OTHERS WIN
WHY DOES HE HAVE TO BE CALLED A SCAMMER UMMM LEMME SEE OH YEAH BECAUSE IT TOOK HIM 39K AND TWO HOURS TO PUT HIS BETS IN SO HE CAN TRY TO WIN WHEN HE BET IT THERE WAS NO LOCK HE WAS GONNA WIN IF HE WOULD OF LOST NO ONE WOULD OF EVEN FOUND OUT ABOUT IT AND WSEX WOULD HAVE BEEN 39K RICHER
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
285
Tokens
Thanks Darryl.

I tried to call Shrink but there was no answer. In any case my offer still stands for those 4 things. I do not want money I did not legitimately win.

Revere14

P.S. Money laundering??? Next thing you know I will be accused of being a member of Al-Queda.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
544
Tokens
Revere
If you had cash up front you win
If its a credit situtation many things have to be looked at
Best of luck buddy-agree no mediation
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,875
Messages
13,574,514
Members
100,879
Latest member
am_sports
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com