I'll take chapman over kimbrel all day. Although I wouldn't complain with either one.
I've seen chapman live many times and he's the most dominant pitcher i've ever witnessed. Most of time he will get through the inning without anyone even putting the ball in play. He's the definition of nasty.
I've seen chapman live many times and he's the most dominant pitcher i've ever witnessed. Most of time he will get through the inning without anyone even putting the ball in play. He's the definition of nasty.
Kimbrel just as dominant as chapman.
The strike to inning ratio is about the same with a slight edge to chapman.
Kimbrel is younger then chapman with 69 more saves. Thats almost 2 seasons worth of saves more then chapman and he's younger.
He has also shown that he is more durable the chapman.
Chapman has a higher chance of having injury problems then Kimbrel based on the past.
The strike to inning ratio is about the same with a slight edge to chapman.
Kimbrel is younger then chapman with 69 more saves. Thats almost 2 seasons worth of saves more then chapman and he's younger.
He has also shown that he is more durable the chapman.
Chapman has a higher chance of having injury problems then Kimbrel based on the past.
But the question of the thread was who do you think will have more saves.
Not who would you rather give the ball to in the World Series.
but even though he's younger he is more used uphno:270 IP to Chapman 234 IP
Chapman was throwing his in the minors while Kimbrel was throwing his in the majors.
#104
- Aroldis Chapman relieved Jonathan Broxton
- Freddie Freeman struck out looking
- Justin Upton struck out swinging
- Chris Johnson struck out swinging
- End of Inning (0 Runs, 0 Hits, 0 Errors)
