More Blatant Liberal Media Bias

[festeringZit]

Compare And Contrast: Gibson’s Questions Of Obama vs. Gibson’s Questions Of Palin


<!-- class="comment-link" --> <!-- AddThis Button BEGIN --> <!-- AddThis Button END -->
<!-- class="post-meta" --> A lot of people felt Sarah Palin got some pretty rough treatment at the hands of Charlie Gibson during her interview on ABC. So just how rough is it? Well, let’s compare the questions Gibson asked Palin with the questions Gibson asked Obama as compiled by The Anchoress.
First, Obama:

How does it feel to break a glass ceiling?
How does it feel to “win”?
How does your family feel about your “winning” breaking a glass ceiling?
Who will be your VP?
Should you choose Hillary Clinton as VP?
Will you accept public finance?
What issues is your campaign about?
Will you visit Iraq?
Will you debate McCain at a town hall?
What did you think of your competitor’s [Clinton] speech?
​

Now Palin:

Do you have enough qualifications for the job you’re seeking? Specifically have you visited foreign countries and met foreign leaders?
Aren’t you conceited to be seeking this high level job?
Questions about foreign policy
-territorial integrity of Georgia
-allowing Georgia and Ukraine to be members of NATO
-NATO treaty
-Iranian nuclear threat
-what to do if Israel attacks Iran
-Al Qaeda motivations
-the Bush Doctrine
-attacking terrorists harbored by Pakistan
Is America fighting a holy war? [misquoted Palin]
​

So Obama gets “how does it feel to win” and “what did you think of Hillary’s speech.” Palin gets questions about the territorial integrity of Georgia.
Fair? Balanced? Objective? Not even a little bit.

 

[Willie99]

Compare And Contrast: Gibson’s Questions Of Obama vs. Gibson’s Questions Of Palin


<!-- class="comment-link" --> <!-- AddThis Button BEGIN --> <!-- AddThis Button END -->
<!-- class="post-meta" --> A lot of people felt Sarah Palin got some pretty rough treatment at the hands of Charlie Gibson during her interview on ABC. So just how rough is it? Well, let’s compare the questions Gibson asked Palin with the questions Gibson asked Obama as compiled by The Anchoress.
First, Obama:

How does it feel to break a glass ceiling?
How does it feel to “win”?
How does your family feel about your “winning” breaking a glass ceiling?
Who will be your VP?
Should you choose Hillary Clinton as VP?
Will you accept public finance?
What issues is your campaign about?
Will you visit Iraq?
Will you debate McCain at a town hall?
What did you think of your competitor’s [Clinton] speech?
​

Now Palin:

Do you have enough qualifications for the job you’re seeking? Specifically have you visited foreign countries and met foreign leaders?
Aren’t you conceited to be seeking this high level job?
Questions about foreign policy
-territorial integrity of Georgia
-allowing Georgia and Ukraine to be members of NATO
-NATO treaty
-Iranian nuclear threat
-what to do if Israel attacks Iran
-Al Qaeda motivations
-the Bush Doctrine
-attacking terrorists harbored by Pakistan
Is America fighting a holy war? [misquoted Palin]
​

So Obama gets “how does it feel to win” and “what did you think of Hillary’s speech.” Palin gets questions about the territorial integrity of Georgia.
Fair? Balanced? Objective? Not even a little bit.

Fester going to town kicking looney ass and not taking prisoners.

This shit is just too funny. Charlie Gibson is officially a discredited moron. A biased piece of shit pretending to be objective, which is why he's a piece of shit. You can be biased, just don't pretend you're not.

Stop buying their product. Do not watch 1 minute of biased coverage.

 

[Preussen]

Compare And Contrast: Gibson’s Questions Of Obama vs. Gibson’s Questions Of Palin


<!-- class="comment-link" --><!-- AddThis Button BEGIN --> <!-- AddThis Button END -->
<!-- class="post-meta" -->A lot of people felt Sarah Palin got some pretty rough treatment at the hands of Charlie Gibson during her interview on ABC. So just how rough is it? Well, let’s compare the questions Gibson asked Palin with the questions Gibson asked Obama as compiled by The Anchoress.

First, Obama:

How does it feel to break a glass ceiling?​

How does it feel to “win”?​

How does your family feel about your “winning” breaking a glass ceiling?​

Who will be your VP?​

Should you choose Hillary Clinton as VP?​

Will you accept public finance?​

What issues is your campaign about?​

Will you visit Iraq?​

Will you debate McCain at a town hall?​

What did you think of your competitor’s [Clinton] speech?​

Now Palin:

Do you have enough qualifications for the job you’re seeking? Specifically have you visited foreign countries and met foreign leaders?​

Aren’t you conceited to be seeking this high level job?​

Questions about foreign policy​

-territorial integrity of Georgia​

-allowing Georgia and Ukraine to be members of NATO​

-NATO treaty​

-Iranian nuclear threat​

-what to do if Israel attacks Iran​

-Al Qaeda motivations​

-the Bush Doctrine​

-attacking terrorists harbored by Pakistan​

Is America fighting a holy war? [misquoted Palin]​

So Obama gets “how does it feel to win” and “what did you think of Hillary’s speech.” Palin gets questions about the territorial integrity of Georgia.
Fair? Balanced? Objective? Not even a little bit.

If what you listed were really all questions for Obama then this is definitely thin.

However, this does not make the interview with Palin "rough". The questions posed to her are (except for the first two, of course) directly connected with the current administration's foreign policy which McCain will most likely continue. Could you, please, give me a link where I can learn Palin's answers? Thank you!

 

[Willie99]

How about, "do you feel you're qualified for the job you're seeking"?

 

[Risk44]

:sadbb: Ooohh Poor wittle baby.. "turning Conservatives into Crybabies everyday"...

You have Fox and AM radio... they slant and Spin worse than all of the "liberal" networks combined... Live with it.

 

[Willie99]

:sadbb: Ooohh Poor wittle baby.. "turning Conservatives into Crybabies everyday"...

You have Fox and AM radio... they slant and Spin worse than all of the "liberal" networks combined... Live with it.

as we turn liberals into losers

:missingte:missingte:missingte

 

[Risk44]

:sadbb: Oh Poor Wittle Johnny Mccain is bein attacked by those big bad bullies for not be in abew to use a computer...

oh sexism and oh poor wittle Pawin.. Waaa-Waaa!!
:nohead:

Oh those Wiberals are wying saying Mccain voted with Bush 90% of the time..

 

[Risk44]

Im Waiting.. Whats The Percentage??

 

[Willie99]

did this bozo just ask a question, in the wrong thread no less, and the demand a response with 8 minutes?

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

:missingte:missingte:missingte:missingte:missingte:missingte

I hope he hyperventilates.

:nohead:

 

[Willie99]

http://64.40.117.4/showthread.php?t=614635

Here you go sweetpea, I'll let Fester try to edumacate you, although I'm a thinking there might be too much thinking involved for some.

 

[Risk44]

did this bozo just ask a question, in the wrong thread no less, and the demand a response with 8 minutes?

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

:missingte:missingte:missingte:missingte:missingte:missingte

I hope he hyperventilates.

:nohead:

OK WILLIE WHY DONT YOU ANSWER THAT QUESTION FOR ME THEN?

 

[gtc08]

sweetlou pounding willie99 today.

 

[Willie99]

There is no answer, unless you have a link that can prove otherwise.

And I'm now answering a question to an issue I never even talked about before. Sadly, you have.

 

[Risk44]

There is no answer, unless you have a link that can prove otherwise.

And I'm now answering a question to an issue I never even talked about before. Sadly, you have.

You wont answer it because you cant.. Because you KNOW THAT MCCAIN VOTED TO SUPPORT BUSH 90% of the TIME..

THESE ARE UNDISPUTABLE FACTS.

SEE THIS BELOW

Source: CQPOLITICS.COM

 

[GasMan]

Has anything changed?

 

[exploited17]

Honestly I don't even mind some bias
The problem is that the overwhelming majority of media is left and more than that they flat out lie
Also,censorship of one side

Almost impossible to not be a little bias
But look at the lies

Russian collusions
BLM false narrative
the way the cover all racial issues
Covid
On and on