Number 1 is nice if you want to throw the rules of logic out the window:
1.) There was no evidence found that the taping was used for the game being played.Therefore there was no cheating.
It just does not mean that much. Smart people know this. Dumb bells and haters do not . They need their motive to post or write or hate. IT IS NoT A BIG DEAL. This has gone on...it does not help teams win and many have done whatever taping or stealing has happened. Get a life and worry about something real. Pats went 18-0 last year you want to explain that?? yeah lets talk about them being 18-0 and why???? How about next year?? You will not. You only talk about a meaningless negative. It means LITTLE.
The people saying the taping doesn't help win game is out of their minds. They were taping the play signals and deciphering what defense was being run. Watch the D coordinator call the play, relay the call to the O coordinator, he relays the call to Brady in the huddle. Brady would come to the line knowing exactly what defense was being run and could audible accordingly. This would be a HUUUUUUUGE competitive advantage if this was what was being done - and really, what else would they possibly be using the tape of the D coordinators for?
The people saying the taping doesn't help win game is out of their minds. They were taping the play signals and deciphering what defense was being run. Watch the D coordinator call the play, relay the call to the O coordinator, he relays the call to Brady in the huddle. Brady would come to the line knowing exactly what defense was being run and could audible accordingly. This would be a HUUUUUUUGE competitive advantage if this was what was being done - and really, what else would they possibly be using the tape of the D coordinators for?
What else would they use the filming of the opposing teams D coordinators for? Surely it wasn't for their amusement
What else would they use the filming of the opposing teams D coordinators for? Surely it wasn't for their amusement
P lot goes on in football and al ot of stealing signals and filming and all that. REGARDLESS,. that does not effect winning and losing. THere is noo much involved and it isn't realistic. Patriots went 18-0 this year.
Poker king, with all due respect, you might know poker but you do not know football. At least this topic. A lot goes on in football and al ot of stealing signals and filming and all that. REGARDLESS,. that does not effect winning and losing. THere is noo much involved and it isn't realistic. Patriots went 18-0 this year. Stick with poker or whatever it is you do because you have no clue on this topic. This is the most overblown thing I have ever seen in my life.
The people saying the taping doesn't help win game is out of their minds. They were taping the play signals and deciphering what defense was being run. Watch the D coordinator call the play, relay the call to the O coordinator, he relays the call to Brady in the huddle. Brady would come to the line knowing exactly what defense was being run and could audible accordingly. This would be a HUUUUUUUGE competitive advantage if this was what was being done - and really, what else would they possibly be using the tape of the D coordinators for?
I like how you say "with all due respect", and then disrespect me. But you still didn't answer my question - what else would they be filming the defensive signals for? And if you don't think the QB knowing what D is going to be run before the play would affect winning and losing then I don't know what to tell you.
No advantage if teams change their signals. In fact the plan could
backfire if they do, and you think you know what they're doing when
you don't.