Montana-Gonzaga

[LowTide]

I was reading a post in the rubber room that mentioned covers.com.I accessed the site-there was a guy in the BB forum wanting his props for telling everybody to take Montana-that he knew the game was fixed.Dawgman does not play much basketball,but he took this game for 35 units and Gonzaga was up 33.Makes me wonder sometimes.And please understand-I am not suggesting the game was fixed-just found it interesting.

 

[winkyduck]

covers is good for a few things - but NOT the forum. as for this game - someone here said something about that game beforehand:

http://therxforum.com/6/ubb.x?a=tpc&s=100090022&f=802099163&m=24610259

 

[LowTide]

I saw your post previously,Winky.I was not trying to start anything-it was just interesting how it fell just perfectly with someone claiming the game was fixed.I know there is no way the game was fixed.

As for the covers forum,it's lowbrow entertainment at best -checkout "bucktexas"' threads and pray he nevers finds this forum.

 

[SweeptheBoard]

not to split hairs, but largest lead was 30 (64-34) - when the scrubs got in , montana made a slight run

zags hit 3 of last 4 ft's which is where you could tank a game

it was a lucky cover by a very average team

 

[absoluteuncertainty]

I think sweep the boards analysis rings true. Plenty of games land right on the number, claims of a fix on the internet not withstanding.

 

[LowTide]

I regret more than ever starting this post.It was just a passing thought.I know the game was not fixed(Gonzaga would be the last place team I would look at to fix a game),there were just some coincidental things that occurred.Never again will I post bullshit like that and I apologize.