Fri 3/12 801 New York Knicks -3 -107 -157 OVER 177 -105
04:05 PM 802 Philadelphia 76ers +3 -103 +142 UNDER 177 -105
Fri 3/12 803 Indiana Pacers -3.5 -110 -176 OVER 184 -108
04:35 PM 804 Boston Celtics +3.5 +100 +161 UNDER 184 -102
Fri 3/12 805 Chicago Bulls +11 +101 +610 OVER 178.5 -105
04:35 PM 806 New Jersey Nets -11 -111 -740 UNDER 178.5 -105
Fri 3/12 807 Washington Wizards +3 -105 +140 OVER 191 -106
04:35 PM 808 Atlanta Hawks -3 -105 -155 UNDER 191 -104
Fri 3/12 809 Seattle Supersonics +5.5 -101 +209 OVER 193.5 -104
04:35 PM 810 Miami Heat -5.5 -109 -235 UNDER 193.5 -106
Fri 3/12 811 Los Angeles Lakers +2.5 -108 +133 OVER 195.5 -102
05:05 PM 812 Minnesota Timberwolves -2.5 -102 -145 UNDER 195.5 -108
Fri 3/12 813 Los Angeles Clippers +9 -103 +410 OVER 196.5 -103
05:05 PM 814 Memphis Grizzlies -9 -107 -470 UNDER 196.5 -107
Fri 3/12 815 Denver Nuggets +4.5 -105 +177 OVER 207.5 -111
05:35 PM 816 Milwaukee Bucks -4.5 -105 -195 UNDER 207.5 +101
817 Golden State
818 05:35p San Antonio
Fri 3/12 819 Utah Jazz +3 -108 +133 OVER 182.5 +100
06:05 PM 820 Phoenix Suns -3 -102 -145 UNDER 182.5 -110
Fri 3/12 821 Sacramento Kings -3 -110 -162 OVER 192 -107
07:05 PM 822 Portland Trail Blazers +3 +100 +147 UNDER 192 -103
04:05 PM 802 Philadelphia 76ers +3 -103 +142 UNDER 177 -105
Fri 3/12 803 Indiana Pacers -3.5 -110 -176 OVER 184 -108
04:35 PM 804 Boston Celtics +3.5 +100 +161 UNDER 184 -102
Fri 3/12 805 Chicago Bulls +11 +101 +610 OVER 178.5 -105
04:35 PM 806 New Jersey Nets -11 -111 -740 UNDER 178.5 -105
Fri 3/12 807 Washington Wizards +3 -105 +140 OVER 191 -106
04:35 PM 808 Atlanta Hawks -3 -105 -155 UNDER 191 -104
Fri 3/12 809 Seattle Supersonics +5.5 -101 +209 OVER 193.5 -104
04:35 PM 810 Miami Heat -5.5 -109 -235 UNDER 193.5 -106
Fri 3/12 811 Los Angeles Lakers +2.5 -108 +133 OVER 195.5 -102
05:05 PM 812 Minnesota Timberwolves -2.5 -102 -145 UNDER 195.5 -108
Fri 3/12 813 Los Angeles Clippers +9 -103 +410 OVER 196.5 -103
05:05 PM 814 Memphis Grizzlies -9 -107 -470 UNDER 196.5 -107
Fri 3/12 815 Denver Nuggets +4.5 -105 +177 OVER 207.5 -111
05:35 PM 816 Milwaukee Bucks -4.5 -105 -195 UNDER 207.5 +101
817 Golden State
818 05:35p San Antonio
Fri 3/12 819 Utah Jazz +3 -108 +133 OVER 182.5 +100
06:05 PM 820 Phoenix Suns -3 -102 -145 UNDER 182.5 -110
Fri 3/12 821 Sacramento Kings -3 -110 -162 OVER 192 -107
07:05 PM 822 Portland Trail Blazers +3 +100 +147 UNDER 192 -103
Past Results
<pre class="ip-ubbcode-code-pre"> Thru Mar 11
Overall Money Lines
Rank Player W L Balance W L $ W/L
1 tigerclicks 48 35 10,020 0 0 0
2 Allstar 34 26 8,100 0 0 0
3 #1cheater# 49 34 7,250 0 0 0
3 sammy the sage 32 27 7,250 0 1 -500
5 GreenDoberman 10 5 6,490 0 0 0
6 MrsCheater 56 52 6,390 0 0 0
7 Mr Green 14 10 6,340 0 0 0
8 Meanstreak 14 17 5,030 0 0 0
9 Gary_Philly 28 27 4,796 1 2 -800
10 MYFOOTBALLGAME 4 5 4,125 0 0 0
11 Augustus 1 3 4,000 0 0 0
12 TomorrowsNewspaper 63 54 3,955 0 0 0
13 Kojak 18 33 1,740 0 0 0
14 MickyD 20 31 1,170 0 0 0
Spreads Parlays/Teasers
Player W L $ W/L W L $ W/L
tigerclicks 48 34 5320 0 1 -300
Allstar 34 20 5800 0 6 -2700
#1cheater# 49 34 2250 0 0 0
sammy the sage 30 21 3450 2 5 -700
GreenDoberman 10 5 1490 0 0 0
MrsCheater 55 49 1470 1 3 -80
Mr Green 14 10 1340 0 0 0
Meanstreak 14 17 30 0 0 0
Gary_Philly 26 25 -604 1 0 1200
MYFOOTBALLGAME 3 3 -50 1 2 -825
Augustus 1 0 500 0 3 -1500
TomorrowsNewspaper 61 53 -2745 2 1 1700
Kojak 16 20 -3000 2 13 -260
MickyD 19 22 -2860 1 9 -970
</pre>
<pre class="ip-ubbcode-code-pre"> Thru Mar 11
Overall Money Lines
Rank Player W L Balance W L $ W/L
1 tigerclicks 48 35 10,020 0 0 0
2 Allstar 34 26 8,100 0 0 0
3 #1cheater# 49 34 7,250 0 0 0
3 sammy the sage 32 27 7,250 0 1 -500
5 GreenDoberman 10 5 6,490 0 0 0
6 MrsCheater 56 52 6,390 0 0 0
7 Mr Green 14 10 6,340 0 0 0
8 Meanstreak 14 17 5,030 0 0 0
9 Gary_Philly 28 27 4,796 1 2 -800
10 MYFOOTBALLGAME 4 5 4,125 0 0 0
11 Augustus 1 3 4,000 0 0 0
12 TomorrowsNewspaper 63 54 3,955 0 0 0
13 Kojak 18 33 1,740 0 0 0
14 MickyD 20 31 1,170 0 0 0
Spreads Parlays/Teasers
Player W L $ W/L W L $ W/L
tigerclicks 48 34 5320 0 1 -300
Allstar 34 20 5800 0 6 -2700
#1cheater# 49 34 2250 0 0 0
sammy the sage 30 21 3450 2 5 -700
GreenDoberman 10 5 1490 0 0 0
MrsCheater 55 49 1470 1 3 -80
Mr Green 14 10 1340 0 0 0
Meanstreak 14 17 30 0 0 0
Gary_Philly 26 25 -604 1 0 1200
MYFOOTBALLGAME 3 3 -50 1 2 -825
Augustus 1 0 500 0 3 -1500
TomorrowsNewspaper 61 53 -2745 2 1 1700
Kojak 16 20 -3000 2 13 -260
MickyD 19 22 -2860 1 9 -970
</pre>
MrsCheater
posted Mar 11, 04 12:05 PM
balance: 5990
sac-7 W
sac 1stH -4 W
sac O218 W
houston U176.5 L
houston U88.5<----- BE CAREFUL IN THE FUTURE - DO YOU MEAN HOUSTON'S SCORE FOR FULL GAME (A LOSS) OR GAME TOTAL FOR 1ST HALF (A WIN)? - SINCE FIRST HALF IS NOT STIPULATED I MUST ASSUME YOU MEAN FULL GAME (HOUSTON'S TOTAL SCORE).
all plays are 550/500
JOH, i understand where u r coming from, that it is a bit ambiguous, cause i didnt specify 1st half play...but since i posted 176.5 immediately above it, can it be counted as NO PLAY, since theres no game in history scored at 88 for the game and i have already stated the total.
i dont want to sound like im making a fuss, just offering a suggestion..as this is only for monoploy money.
posted Mar 11, 04 12:05 PM
balance: 5990
sac-7 W
sac 1stH -4 W
sac O218 W
houston U176.5 L
houston U88.5<----- BE CAREFUL IN THE FUTURE - DO YOU MEAN HOUSTON'S SCORE FOR FULL GAME (A LOSS) OR GAME TOTAL FOR 1ST HALF (A WIN)? - SINCE FIRST HALF IS NOT STIPULATED I MUST ASSUME YOU MEAN FULL GAME (HOUSTON'S TOTAL SCORE).
all plays are 550/500
JOH, i understand where u r coming from, that it is a bit ambiguous, cause i didnt specify 1st half play...but since i posted 176.5 immediately above it, can it be counted as NO PLAY, since theres no game in history scored at 88 for the game and i have already stated the total.
i dont want to sound like im making a fuss, just offering a suggestion..as this is only for monoploy money.
You say, "theres no game in history scored at 88 for the game"...
Do you think it is presumptuous of me to assume that you meant to wager on Houston's team score alone for the full game? After all, 88 points would be a feasible score, in that case. The same goes for your wager on "houston U176.5". I assumed you meant houston's game total score since 176.5 is a feasible total for the full game. If you don't specifically denote 1st half, I must assume "full game". It IS play money, and it IS being fussy, but earlier on, people wanted the rules to be followed, so why not continue to do so? Bottom line is, be accurate and concise. I believe a loss is in order here. JMO.
Do you think it is presumptuous of me to assume that you meant to wager on Houston's team score alone for the full game? After all, 88 points would be a feasible score, in that case. The same goes for your wager on "houston U176.5". I assumed you meant houston's game total score since 176.5 is a feasible total for the full game. If you don't specifically denote 1st half, I must assume "full game". It IS play money, and it IS being fussy, but earlier on, people wanted the rules to be followed, so why not continue to do so? Bottom line is, be accurate and concise. I believe a loss is in order here. JMO.
