Moneyline vs. -1.5 Runlines

Search

He IS $$$
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Messages
1,012
Tokens
You're post convinced me to try it today with the Braves. The money worked out so it's basically -1, because if Atl wins by 1 run then the winnings from the ML covers the loss from the runline. But if they win by more than 1, I get a better payout than if I put it all on the moneyline.

BOL

I hope it works as planned for today. I usually look at the card and find the worst paying RL odds of the day as a starting point. You will see that I got burned on opening day taking the Yankees who are always overpriced in the market but I played it as a play on CC more than anything. I thought things might change for him as he got off to an 0-4 start last year before becoming lights out and I thought he might be in better form this year.

It usually hits between 66% - 72% of the time. Somedays winning by one run will still net some profit. D.Lowe came with a high price tag today.

I am also looking at the 5 inning RL where we only have to give up a half of a run. Have not posted these yet but played two of them small yesterday actually in a two team parlay and won with the Yankees but came 1 out away from winning with the Dodgers who gave up a double with two outs and a man on second in the bottom of the 5th. So I lost by 1/2 a run. in a 1-1 ball game at the end of 5.
 

Don't assume people in charge know what they are d
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
6,476
Tokens
I play RL sometimes but only when the total is 9 or above.
Are there any stats of RL with high totals versus low??

Taking this to the extreme if the total was set at 3(crazy)the chances of a one run game are dramatically increased as opposed to a total of 20(equally crazy). This just for example.

IMHO: RL are a better wager when a higher total is set by the bookmaker.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
You're post convinced me to try it today with the Braves. The money worked out so it's basically -1, because if Atl wins by 1 run then the winnings from the ML covers the loss from the runline. But if they win by more than 1, I get a better payout than if I put it all on the moneyline.

I myself will occasionally wager both the ML and the RL for a team, but I want to be sure that I make a profit if only one comes in (whether a Fave runline or a Dog runline)

Also, I never....NEVER wager ML straight for more than -140

Now I will use higher faved MLs, but I only do so in a 2TeamParlay so as to reduce my exposure.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Final note for now....Always remember that RLs can be quite useful from a Dog standpoint as well, up to (in my opinion) -140

In such a case, lower Total-lined games can be a modest indicator.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,888
Messages
13,463,801
Members
99,497
Latest member
vinbetonline
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com