Mr J said:Wow, how very naive. Large sample sizes means plenty of cases where someone has wrongly been convicted. You'd be more unlucky to get convicted for kiddy rape or something.
They admit to it because of pressure or to get a lesser sentence.
Strong evidence to put someone away? Obviously not all facts are always known, and not all the known facts are always presented in court. Sometimes even the facts aren't enough. Strong evidence can still be very incomplete evidence. The evidence itself may not be any good, eg a lying witness, mistaken identity, coincidence etc.
Doug, I'd imagine that guilty people getting set free is a much smaller % than people who are wrongly convicted. Is convicting 10 murders worth 1 innocent man in prison? Is setting free one guilty man worth setting free 10 innocent men?
Mr J: Hi, I remember you from SSB. I disagree about guilty people being set free being less than wrongly convicted. In USA many clearly guilty are set free due to minor proceedural errors ( Cop forgot to read rights, etc.).
No convicting 10 isn't worth it if one is wrongly jailed, that's way too high an error rate, esp. if you are that one. I don't get the last sentence.