Lurkerfor ages.....

[SportSavant]

lurker, I have noticed by your posts that you seem to be a very 'mathematical' handicapper...I also handicap primarily the same way...Unfortunately with work, fiancee & 2 dogs (geez I dont even have kids...lol) I dont really have time to do player analysis or compare every single stat...

I would love to hear more about some of your methods if you have the time & to hear about some things you have discovered with yourdatabase...glad you started posting...

 

[WEEKENDALKI]

c'mon lurker, share.

 

[Horseshoe]

Where have you been Dalki?..glad your back..here's hoping you'll be here for March and to help the bottom line.

I too, find Lurker's posts quite informative.

 

[lurkerforages]

Not much to share.
I make money betting sports.

Just like any other self employed job.
You either get good at it or you don`t eat.

 

[D2bets]

Rule #1,2 and 3:
Only bet good (and the best available) numbers/odds

 

[lurkerforages]

rule #4 unless the juice is good.

If offered under 198 +110 or under 199 -110 on the bucks game I would take the worse number.

 

[D2bets]

Agreed. That's what I mean by numbers/odds -- the combination thereof. It's very important to know the approximate odds value of each half point.