LOREN78's OneStop All You Can Read About 9/11 thread

[Loren78]

LOL...Tell us something we don't know.....the devious little shit - Loren78


Cheney Says No Evidence Tying Iraq To 9/11 And That There Never Was

Published on 06-02-2009 Email To Friend Print Version
http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/06/02/che...-evidence-iraq/

Oops.

Former Vice President Dick Cheney wants a do-over. After being party to an administration that repeatedly sought to tie the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks with Saddam Hussein, he’s ready to let that assertion go.

In an interview with Fox News’ Greta van Susteren Monday, Cheney said there was no evidence tying Iraq and 9/11 — and that there never was.

“On the question of whether or not Iraq was involved in 9-11, there was never any evidence to prove that,” he told the Fox host. “There was “some reporting early on … but that was never borne out… [President] George [Bush] … did say and did testify that there was an ongoing relationship between al-Qaeda and Iraq, but no proof that Iraq was involved in 9-11.”

Cheney’s comments are a marked shift from those he made in 2003. Pressed to disavow assertions that Iraq was in any way involved with the attacks, the then-VP claimed the administration was learning “more and more” about al Qaeda-Iraq ties.

Now, after 4,308 US servicemembers have lost their lives in Iraq, and no longer in office, the vociferous GOP hawk has appears to have changed his mind.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fiVTuVozst8&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fiVTuVozst8&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

 

[ProPokerPlayer]

did say and did testify that there was an ongoing relationship between al-Qaeda and Iraq,

the then-VP claimed the administration was learning “more and more” about al Qaeda-Iraq ties.


Whats missing here?

 

[Willie99]

The argument against Iraq was that they funded, financed, encouraged and sheltered terrorists and that they were in violation of various UN Resolutions pertaining to WMD and inspections.

Of course, if 9/11 was an inside job meant to justify our invasion of Iraq, I can't understand why the planners didn't implicate Iraq, eh?

 

[SmallDaddy]

"The argument against Iraq was that they funded, financed, encouraged and sheltered terrorists "



And those are who?

 

[MoneyTalks--banned]

Of course, if 9/11 was an inside job meant to justify our invasion of Iraq, I can't understand why the planners didn't implicate Iraq, eh?

Oh boy, what a great defense case you made for the U.S. government.

All we need to do now is ignore the laws of science ##)

 

[Willie99]

"The argument against Iraq was that they funded, financed, encouraged and sheltered terrorists "



And those are who?

are you kidding me? for this, there is no dispute

http://www.husseinandterror.com/

far too much to paste

 

[Willie99]

Oh boy, what a great defense case you made for the U.S. government.

All we need to do now is ignore the laws of science ##)

actually, it just shoots another big hole in the inside job case. There are 10,001 questions conspiracy worshipers can't answer with respect to their arguments, the fact that the planners could have simply planted evidence to indict Iraq has easily as they indicted anyone else being just one.

why didn't they just indict Iraq?

answer? because that's not what happened

Laws of science? OMFG

 

[ScottL]

Barman, can you merge this with another 9/11 thread? No need to answer Lauren's cries for attention.

 

[Loren78]

The argument against Iraq was that they funded, financed, encouraged and sheltered terrorists and that they were in violation of various UN Resolutions pertaining to WMD and inspections.

Of course, if 9/11 was an inside job meant to justify our invasion of Iraq, I can't understand why the planners didn't implicate Iraq, eh?

Because Valerie Plame wouldn't allow it......lol


Rookie...

 

[Loren78]

Willie Boy....lol....Give It Up....Come Across....

BUSH = IRAQ HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH 911

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/f_A77N5WKWM&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/f_A77N5WKWM&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

 

[Loren78]

Scott L This message is hidden because Scott L is on your ignore list.

 

[Willie99]

Because Valerie Plame wouldn't allow it......lol


Rookie...

you do know Joe Wilson had cocktails with a friend in Niger long after the war was started, eh?

buying yellow cake from Niger is not the same as 9/11, no?

do you ever have to come close to connecting the dots?

 

[Willie99]

Willie Boy....lol....Give It Up....Come Across....

BUSH = IRAQ HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH 911

<object width="425" height="344">


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/f_A77N5WKWM&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object>

isn't that what I said?

:think2:

 

[ScottL]

Scott L This message is hidden because Scott L is on your ignore list.

Really? Than how come you only post the above when I type something that makes you cwy Wawen?

I'm on your ignore list like Jessica Alba is in your bed ya dipshit.

 

[barman]

Barman, can you merge this with another 9/11 thread? No need to answer Lauren's cries for attention.

:grandmais

 

[ScottL]

I changed my mind. This thread is awesome!

[Ya see Steak, people really do change their minds in the poly forum]

 

[BASEHEAD]

Same thing the CIA had said,same thing the prewar intel committee said,same thing the Bush admin had said.......

(U) Conclusion 96. The Central Intelligence Agency's assessment that to date there was no evidence proving Iraqi complicity or assistance in an al-Qaida attack was reasonable and objective. No additional information has emerged to suggest otherwise.

so this is news how?

 

[TotalRecall]

Why didnt they implicate Iraq? Because Iraq is just a place. And a place can be destroyed. Now Al Quaeda was terrorism- a tactic. You cant kill a tactic. Suicide bombing will always be a dangerously effective tactic. Keeping the shadowy visage of Bin Laden infecting your dreams for the next 100 years with the visions of horror that 9/11 provided- and he provided- for you- surviving as well- kept alive by the propaganda ministers that know youre perfectly happy with us invading Iraq. Because someone had to pay. An Hussein was on the list for possible removal anyway. They were found to have planned this invasion long before 9/11. Hussein was a bad man. He fired Scuds at Israel in the first Gulf War- causing many casulties. They said Hussein tried to kill Bush senior by poisoning his food so the son avenging the fathers close calls works fine in everybody's mind. And dont forget how he had those babies bayoneted right out if the incubators. Nobody needed direct links to 9/11.

Dick Cheney lies for a living. He lied for Nixon. He lied for Bush. He said they had ironclad evidence of a meeting in Bagdad naming Atta as the connector. It was all a lie- but a great story.

Most of the guys who originally enlisted and served and died in Iraq believed those stories. From the beginning you could tell it wasnt a war in the conventional sense. No standing Army in their way. No Navy. No Air Force awaited them. This stupid mess started as mop up operation that quickly became an occupation. The biggest battle was the road to the Airport. That stretch to this day is a bad place to be driving a vehicle without extra armor plating underneath it.

Saddam Hussein was royalty. The royalty play these stupid war games like chess and make money selling weapons to both sides. When one side looses the main players are removed the board but they arent going to kill royalty.

Saddam Hussein came from royalty and money. Big money. He was groomed as a young man by the CIA to be the leader of Iraq. He served on the board of a British Corporation that includes her Majesty the Queen of England. Why would they kill one of their own rather than supply a double? HaHa... welcome to the game!!!

Because that was not Saddam Hussein they hung.

Dont believe me though. I only deal in facts- like dental records which did not match at autopsy.

Ask his wife. They took her to see "her husband" only once after she repeatedly demanded to see him.

After emerging from the jail - they asked her how is he how is he holding up?

I dont know youll have to ask him when they find him.

But you just saw him didnt you?

I saw him yes but I did not see my husband.

That man they showed me is an imposter.

But this was occupied Iraq and the news said she was suffering from "hysterical exhaustion."

So they went on with the mock trial that the public had to have and they hung this man who's family would not be killed and would be made rich and all that. So he had to play along too.

Saddam lives in on of the 129 "cities" that exist underground now and will remain there for the rest of his life never to surface again.

Call it a spook story if you want I dont care. I know the truth and I can prove it.

All you know is the lie and you can repeat it a trillion times but that wont make it any less a lie.!~~~!

 

[Willie99]

Come on now TR, just a few Iraqis would have helped, no?

Nobody said they had to make 9/11 his doing entirely, so your argument that they needed a larger argument for their overall war on terror falls flat.

Although at least it sounds plausible and you gave it a shot, that's commendable.

 

[MoneyTalks--banned]

I must agree. The reasons for staging 9/11 had to be far more sinister than that. Obviously, we aren't going to stop at Iraq. Iran will be next and more will follow. Eventually, we are going to wipe out a large portion of the Muslim population. I think that just about nails it.