look at this end of the game "fumble"

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
689
Tokens
25up0sy.gif

no review either :monsters-
 

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
17,004
Tokens
I though Michaels said they looked at it at the end of game before the kneel down
 

The Truth
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
1,118
Tokens
i HEAR YA.....MORE IMPRESSED WITH HOW YOU GOT SUCH A NICE ACTION REPLY PASTED IN YOUR THREAD SO QUICKLY?
 

New member
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
689
Tokens
I though Michaels said they looked at it at the end of game before the kneel down
in 4 seconds then very quickly ran the next play so the booth couldnt review it further

Super Bowl on the line and they spend less then 5 seconds it :think2:
 

They drew first blood
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
1,383
Tokens
If tom brady and that stupid tuck rule gave it back to them, i dont know how you cant say his arm wasnt going forward.
 

t3a

RX Ninja
Joined
Dec 25, 2004
Messages
5,250
Tokens
I am looking for a replay of the 100 yard int return where Hightower (I think it was him) got blocked in the back.


Funny how so many long punt/kick returns get called back when they teams have their specialized return teams on the field yet Pittsburgh's denfensive team executed a 100 yarder flawlessy
 

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
17,004
Tokens
in 4 seconds then very quickly ran the next play so the booth couldnt review it further

Super Bowl on the line and they spend less then 5 seconds it :think2:

I agree what you are saying as there were alot of questionable calls in this game that I wont argue with you on that
 

Banned
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
108
Tokens
I though Michaels said they looked at it at the end of game before the kneel down


yeah michaels said they reviewed it and said it was a fumble (that was probably the quickest booth review in history)
 

New member
Joined
May 5, 2005
Messages
1,502
Tokens
i dunno, yes they should have reviewed it, but i'm not so sure there was definitive evidence to overrule the call on the field.:wink:
 

New member
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
689
Tokens
posted in another thread..

I thought Pittsburgh's claim to fame was their great defense.

They allowed 407 yards and were outgained by 100+ but still won. It's as if they had some other force that kept stepping up whenever they needed it

steeler-ref.jpg



:missingte
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2008
Messages
428
Tokens
I think it was clearly incomplete, but even if there isn't great evidence.... you don't stop the game and review a play that helps decide the Super Bowl?

3rd shady game with pitt officiating. did too many people have AZ money line?
 

Beat the System!!
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
3,875
Tokens
How could such an important game with a crucial call be not reviewed........because if you read the articles from sportbook managers from at least 5 Casinos they all said the only thing they want to happen is Pitt win the game. Too much ticket on the Arizona ML.....

That is why I said the best play today was Pitt ML.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
12,563
Tokens
they didnt review it because it was incomplete. its a football game. who cares. i dont think anything would've changed if they got another shot anyways.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,832
Messages
13,573,790
Members
100,876
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com