Line reading 101

[ZJP6050]

You can't be serious? And jimmyjet I am waiting for you in the politics forum for uour defense of komradbama.

aside from a ground-base argumentive state, nobody cares what you have to say or your thoughts on the world and our government.

 

[Funnyb25]

I believe in facts and truth based on facts- if you want to be one of the sheeple come to my politics thread and defend ismonovobama.

this has nothing to do with what this thread is about...

 

[ZJP6050]

Oh and I rest my case on Kansas City, if you could understand Hoosiers posts you'd be like mr holding a royals winning ticket

i didn't even look through the lines, nor am i saying whether you're right or wrong on this subject in THIS thread. i'm stating that i could care less about your views. you're not in the politics forum, you're in the baseball forum. go back to where you came from.

 

[Funnyb25]

Oh and I rest my case on Kansas City, if you could understand Hoosiers posts you'd be like me holding a royals winning ticket

doesnt matter what the score is... you are still wrong according to rule #3....

 

[TheBigM39]

Thank you to the mods for removing the frog from this thread

 

[1968]

from what i decipher indians fit the rule as a play.

 

[Funnyb25]

from what i decipher indians fit the rule as a play.

i believe so as well.. thanks for confirming...

 

[1968]

i believe so as well.. thanks for confirming...

but then again I showed yankees as a fav play as well and they are losing, so "what do I know" lol.

 

[1968]

here is my question regarding phillies and dodgers.

when 5dimes went to a dime line, it favored the dodgers. BUT, the phillies line has continued to drop all day and not reverted back to where it was, hence favoring the phillis. So I am seeing that as a contradiction- correct?

 

[JimmyJet]

sorry for responding off subject.....was or is Washington a play because of the movement?

 

[JimmyJet]

Washington is now a better play at Bodog than Matchbook
Wash +106 at Matchbook and +108 at Bodog

 

[1968]

sorry for responding off subject.....was or is Washington a play because of the movement?

by the way I read it, washington would be the play as a dog.
06/06 06:40AM: -123 / +118
06/06 07:12AM: -124 / +114
06/06 08:19AM: -120 / +110

 

[JimmyJet]

does it now fit Rule #1?

 

[Funnyb25]

but then again I showed yankees as a fav play as well and they are losing, so "what do I know" lol.

lol, not every play will win according to that system... just in the long run it should be more profitable... same with bluejays.... they were a play according to rule #3, but they are losing.... it happens....

also according to rule #3 the Cubs would be a play....

Cubs @ Reds

<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="alternate"><td>06/06</td><td>12:37 AM</td><td style="text-align: center;">-121</td><td style="text-align: center;">+116</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="alternate"><td>06/06</td><td>08:45 AM</td><td style="text-align: center;">-133</td><td style="text-align: center;">+123</td></tr></tbody></table>
when it went from nickel to dime it was a .12 swing to the cubs

Rockies @ Cardinals

<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="alternate"><td>06/06</td><td>12:30 AM</td><td style="text-align: center;">+122</td><td style="text-align: center;">-127</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td>06/06</td><td>08:12 AM</td><td style="text-align: center;">+110</td><td style="text-align: center;">-120</td></tr></tbody></table>
when it went from nickel to dime it was a .12 swing to the rockies

Dbacks @ Padres

<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="alternate"><td>06/06</td><td>12:31 AM</td><td style="text-align: center;">-120</td><td style="text-align: center;">+115</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td>06/06</td><td>08:46 AM</td><td style="text-align: center;">-130</td><td style="text-align: center;">+120</td></tr></tbody></table>
when it went form nickel to dime it was a .10 swing to the dbacks

according to Rule 3... the Indians, Cubs, Rockies and Dbacks would all be plays....

now will they cash?? who knows...

 

[1968]

does it now fit Rule #1?

i believe so, matchbook +106 and bodog +108

 

[JimmyJet]

by the way I read it, washington would be the play as a dog.
06/06 06:40AM: -123 / +118
06/06 07:12AM: -124 / +114
06/06 08:19AM: -120 / +110

thanks 1968 for the confirmation <><>

 

[1968]

no prob jimmy.

now for the 3 o'clocks i show-

indians
no play on phillies/dodgers- contradicting of rules
see nothing personally on seattle game

 

[jevers77]

but then again I showed yankees as a fav play as well and they are losing, so "what do I know" lol.

The TB line was +186 at match and +190 at 2 others just before game, so TB was the play under rule #1 and NYY were the play under rule #3, I would just stay away from games like that if your following these rules. I also believe NYY fit Rule #4 now to.

 

[1968]

The TB line was +186 at match and +190 at 2 others just before game, so TB was the play under rule #1 and NYY were the play under rule #3, I would just stay away from games like that if your following these rules. I also believe NYY fit Rule #4 now to.

Hmm, I thought wager street wasnt taken into account under rule #1? That is the only book I saw higher than matchbook's line. Maybe I mis-understood mr hoosiers post. By my notes (and im just on day #2 of this) I have KC as a play (i know, not siding with the asshat hornedfrog just how I had it mapped out per the rules on my interpretation fitting one of the rules) and Yankees as a play fitting 2 rules.

 

[jevers77]

Hmm, I thought wager street wasnt taken into account under rule #1? That is the only book I saw higher than matchbook's line. Maybe I mis-understood mr hoosiers post. By my notes (and im just on day #2 of this) I have KC as a play (i know, not siding with the asshat hornedfrog just how I had it mapped out per the rules on my interpretation fitting one of the rules) and Yankees as a play fitting 2 rules.

On the 1st day he used wager street for 2 plays and wsex was also at +190. But yes the NYY fit 2 rules.

I see Clev rule 3 and Min rule 3 and 4.