Line reading 101

[Paddywack]

Cubs heating up!

 

[ZJP6050]

alfonsoooooooo was due

 

[ZJP6050]

and just when the twins tie it up...seattle leads off the inning with a homerun. un fuckin believable

 

[ZJP6050]

and another hr from seattle...


no matter what still a profitable day if the cubs hit. had my two biggest plays on cleveland and the cubs. also had atlanta, detroit. now i have minny and sdg. sdg is a bust, minny not looking great. waiting on a big play for tonight possibly

 

[nikeairx]

what were the plays today.. im soo confused when u list both teams with a sports book.. whats the plays??

 

[Hip2Bsq]

Phillies are a rule #4 play....

MONEYLINES PHI / LAD
06/06 04:16PM: +126 / -136
06/06 07:19PM: +123 / -133
06/06 09:29PM: +118 / -128
06/07 09:26AM: +116 / -126
06/07 09:55AM: +112 / -122
06/07 10:32AM: +111 / -121
06/07 11:44AM: +108 / -118
06/07 02:32PM: +106 / -116
06/07 03:57PM: +105 / -115
06/07 05:44PM: +103 / -113

 

[ZJP6050]

Phillies are a rule #4 play....

MONEYLINES PHI / LAD
06/06 04:16PM: +126 / -136
06/06 07:19PM: +123 / -133
06/06 09:29PM: +118 / -128
06/07 09:26AM: +116 / -126
06/07 09:55AM: +112 / -122
06/07 10:32AM: +111 / -121
06/07 11:44AM: +108 / -118
06/07 02:32PM: +106 / -116
06/07 03:57PM: +105 / -115
06/07 05:44PM: +103 / -113

i also saw that. they're also a rule #3 play, listed below:

<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="alternate"><td>06/07</td><td>01:36 AM</td><td style="text-align: center;">+123</td><td style="text-align: center;">-128</td></tr><tr><td>06/07</td><td>07:51 AM</td><td style="text-align: center;">+122</td><td style="text-align: center;">-127</td></tr><tr class="alternate"><td>06/07</td><td>08:46 AM</td><td style="text-align: center;">+119</td><td style="text-align: center;">-129</td></tr></tbody></table>

 

[letsgohoosiers]

Rule 4 plays today:
CIN L
ATL W
WAS W
TEX W
HOU W
CLE W
STL L

PHI looks good. I expect it to be a Rule #1 play too due to the eHorseX line.

 

[nikeairx]

i noticed that teams who play each other are listed with a sportsbook next to them.. how are both teams a play, it makes no sense... btw, Was was a loser?? can someone explain these to me

 

[Funnyb25]

Rule 4 plays today:
CIN L
ATL W
WAS W
TEX W
HOU W
CLE W
STL L

PHI looks good. I expect it to be a Rule #1 play too due to the eHorseX line.

WAS didnt win... they got pounded

 

[Hip2Bsq]

Good lookin out Zjp. Two rules working together = I will put a little something on it. we are in profit today, and we are gonna keep it that way.
Phils have lost 2 heartbreakers in a row @ Chavez Ravine after coming into this with a 7 game winning streak. They should be playing to avoid losing a third straight and get a split for the series.

 

[ZJP6050]

Rule 4 plays today:
CIN L
ATL W
WAS W
TEX W
HOU W
CLE W
STL L

PHI looks good. I expect it to be a Rule #1 play too due to the eHorseX line.

man, i didn't even look at rule 4 today. philly is qualifying as 3 and 4 right now, right?

 

[ZJP6050]

Good lookin out Zjp. Two rules working together = I will put a little something on it. we are in profit today, and we are gonna keep it that way.
Phils have lost 2 heartbreakers in a row @ Chavez Ravine after coming into this with a 7 game winning streak. They should be playing to avoid losing a third straight and get a split for the series.

as with hoosiers, i think it will reach #1 also. hoosiers - can you point out any plays today that qualified under rule #2??

 

[jblonghorn]

So they Phil's are a play this evening?

 

[ZJP6050]

WOW! padres with a 5 run 9th to tie it up!! david eckstein with a 3 run blast lol

 

[jblonghorn]

ZJP, what does Pops' spreadsheet say in regards to this evening's Phillies, Dodgers game?

 

[ZJP6050]

ZJP, what does Pops' spreadsheet say in regards to this evening's Phillies, Dodgers game?

i have no idea about that lol. the only thing i know about his topic really is the "waldo" brothers, which are just umpires for totals.

 

[ZJP6050]

hoosiers - what's going on with the greek??? it has phillies at -110? weird..anyway, phils becoming a play according to rule #1. and of course still with #3, and #4

 

[Funnyb25]

and who are the "waldo" brothers? i dont think i understand a single thing in that entire thread... lmao

 

[letsgohoosiers]

Seems the books can't put a line out that will please LAD backers.