Liberal media already cutting their own throat..ROTFLMFAO!!!

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
[SIZE=+1]CNN’s John Roberts: Palin Might Neglect Her Disabled Infant?[/SIZE]
<SMALL>NewsBusters ^| August 29, 2008 | Matthew Balan </SMALL>

<SMALL></SMALL>

CNN’s John Roberts, after briefly alluding to the issue of Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin’s experience he called into question earlier on Friday’s "Newsroom" program, asked correspondent Dana Bash about how the Alaska governor’s newborn son with Down’s syndrome might be affected if she were elected: "There's also this issue that on April 18th, she gave birth to a baby with Down's Syndrome.... Children with Down's syndrome require an awful lot of attention. The role of Vice President, it seems to me, would take up an awful lot of her time, and it raises the issue of how much time will she have to dedicate to her newborn child?"
Bash deftly answered this question, which has the implication that Palin could neglect her infant son, and made a possible counter-argument the McCain camp would use, that a question like Roberts’ would be sexist: "That's a very good question, and I guess -- my guess is that, perhaps, the line inside the McCain campaign would be, if it were a man being picked who also had a baby, but -- you know, four months ago with Down's Syndrome, would you ask the same question?" The CNN correspondent continued by briefly describing the Palin’s family situation and the thinking that may have gone into the situation for both McCain and Palin herself. She concluded by reporting on the Alaska governor’s appeal to social conservatives because she is "very staunchly anti-abortion," in Bash’s words.
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 9, 2005
Messages
3,981
Tokens
[SIZE=+1]CNN’s John Roberts: Palin Might Neglect Her Disabled Infant?[/SIZE]
<SMALL>NewsBusters ^| August 29, 2008 | Matthew Balan </SMALL>

<SMALL></SMALL>

CNN’s John Roberts, after briefly alluding to the issue of Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin’s experience he called into question earlier on Friday’s "Newsroom" program, asked correspondent Dana Bash about how the Alaska governor’s newborn son with Down’s syndrome might be affected if she were elected: "There's also this issue that on April 18th, she gave birth to a baby with Down's Syndrome.... Children with Down's syndrome require an awful lot of attention. The role of Vice President, it seems to me, would take up an awful lot of her time, and it raises the issue of how much time will she have to dedicate to her newborn child?"
Bash deftly answered this question, which has the implication that Palin could neglect her infant son, and made a possible counter-argument the McCain camp would use, that a question like Roberts’ would be sexist: "That's a very good question, and I guess -- my guess is that, perhaps, the line inside the McCain campaign would be, if it were a man being picked who also had a baby, but -- you know, four months ago with Down's Syndrome, would you ask the same question?" The CNN correspondent continued by briefly describing the Palin’s family situation and the thinking that may have gone into the situation for both McCain and Palin herself. She concluded by reporting on the Alaska governor’s appeal to social conservatives because she is "very staunchly anti-abortion," in Bash’s words.
CNN is a joke!!:drink:
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 9, 2005
Messages
3,981
Tokens
It is pathetic and a shame. They probably wonder why she just didn't get an abortion!!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
I'm more concerned that she's never taken a public position on anything. They wait until the last second and roll someone out two months before the election that has never been vetted in any way. I read today that McCain didn't know her until recently and only met her once. Unreal. Just unreal.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
It is pathetic and a shame. They probably wonder why she just didn't get an abortion!!
<!-- / message -->
Don't laugh. About the 8th year of an Obama presidency it might be mandatory.Obama would have us back to the future of Germany 1938.
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 9, 2005
Messages
3,981
Tokens
I'm more concerned that she's never taken a public position on anything. They wait until the last second and roll someone out two months before the election that has never been vetted in any way. I read today that McCain didn't know her until recently and only met her once. Unreal. Just unreal.
Now you know how we feel about BHO, and who he really is!!:toast:
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
8,894
Tokens
I'm more concerned that she's never taken a public position on anything. They wait until the last second and roll someone out two months before the election that has never been vetted in any way. I read today that McCain didn't know her until recently and only met her once. Unreal. Just unreal.

Got a link?

She hasn't been vetted...C'mon. So much desperation today.

I knew she was on the short list since April.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
I'm more concerned that she's never taken a public position on anything. They wait until the last second and roll someone out two months before the election that has never been vetted in any way. I read today that McCain didn't know her until recently and only met her once. Unreal. Just unreal.

On behalf of myself and all conservatives here at the Rx, thanks for your concern.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
I'm more concerned that she's never taken a public position on anything. They wait until the last second and roll someone out two months before the election that has never been vetted in any way. I read today that McCain didn't know her until recently and only met her once. Unreal. Just unreal.

D2bets,

Your blatant hypocrisy in not blasting Obama's laughable lack of experience
means you have zero credibility.
 

powdered milkman
Joined
Aug 4, 2006
Messages
22,984
Tokens
D2bets,

Your blatant hypocrisy in not blasting Obama's laughable lack of experience
means you have zero credibility.
RW......opinion only....isnt the poly forum great?...........we've already chosen captains and picked teams.....no one is switching sides
 

the bear is back biatches!! printing cancel....
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,692
Tokens
Is that simply incredible or what?
These people are so pathetic.

y watching this circus show quite amazing seems to get worse and worse with each election cycle

you one of the few guys on here that can see through it all....

:toast:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,967
Messages
13,575,642
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com