I want to help the forum. This thread will be used exclusively to identify pitchers who are;
1. Performing well and have poor traditional numbers (unjustified)
These pitchers are good fade material and will be overvalued.
2. Performing well and have good traditional numbers (justified)
These can be good to back, since people often think they are a fluke.
3. Performing poorly and have good traditional numbers (unjustified)
These are excellent candidates to back.
4. Performing poorly and have poor traditional numbers (justified.)
When this type is a veteran with a proven track record, an overblown reputation, and on a popular team, they are a great fade.
So, post your pitcher and we will try to determine what type they fit into. We will then track them throughout the year to see how they progress.
1. Performing well and have poor traditional numbers (unjustified)
These pitchers are good fade material and will be overvalued.
2. Performing well and have good traditional numbers (justified)
These can be good to back, since people often think they are a fluke.
3. Performing poorly and have good traditional numbers (unjustified)
These are excellent candidates to back.
4. Performing poorly and have poor traditional numbers (justified.)
When this type is a veteran with a proven track record, an overblown reputation, and on a popular team, they are a great fade.
So, post your pitcher and we will try to determine what type they fit into. We will then track them throughout the year to see how they progress.