I am a little surprised. To me it seems as though the line could've been as high as 5.5 and the public would still have taken the Colts. I assumed that 1) sharp money was keeping the book honest, and 2) the book was gonna take on some risk and bet on Cinci.
Had the line stayed at 3 or 3.5 (it is now up to 4 or 4.5) I would have been eager to bet on the Bengals, and happily side with the books. The question is, have the sharps made a late play on Indy, or is this the Green injury factor -- and yet, even more public money?
I am still leaning heavily on Cinci, but the line movement is giving me pause.
Had the line stayed at 3 or 3.5 (it is now up to 4 or 4.5) I would have been eager to bet on the Bengals, and happily side with the books. The question is, have the sharps made a late play on Indy, or is this the Green injury factor -- and yet, even more public money?
I am still leaning heavily on Cinci, but the line movement is giving me pause.