L.A. wants yearlong fast food ban

Search

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
12,563
Tokens
City Council to vote Tuesday on plan for impoverished southern part of city


LOS ANGELES - In the impoverished neighborhood of South Los Angeles, fast food is the easiest cuisine to find — and that's a problem for elected officials who see it as an unhealthy source of calories and cholesterol.The City Council was poised to vote Tuesday on a moratorium on new fast-food restaurants in a swath of the city where a proliferation of such eateries goes hand-in-hand with obesity.
"Our communities have an extreme shortage of quality foods," City Councilman Bernard Parks said.



Bid to attract healthier restaurants
The aim of the yearlong moratorium, which won full support from a City Council committee last week, is to give the city time to try to attract restaurants that serve healthier food.
The California Restaurant Association says the moratorium, which could be extended up to two years, is misguided.
Fast food "is the only industry that wants to be in South LA," said association spokesman Andrew Casana. "Sit-down restaurants don't want to go in. If they did, they'd be there. This moratorium isn't going to help them relocate."
The proposed ban comes at a time when governments of all levels are increasingly viewing menus as a matter of public health. Last Friday, California became the first state in the nation to bar trans fats, which lowers levels of good cholesterol and increases bad cholesterol.


Tackling new issues
It also comes as the Los Angeles City Council tackles issues beyond safety, schools and streets. The council last week decided to outlaw plastic bags.
Fast-food restaurants have found themselves in the frying pan in a number of cities. Some places, including Carmel-by-the Sea and Calistoga, have barred "formula" restaurants altogether; others have placed a cap on them — Arcata allows a maximum of nine fast-food eateries; others have prohibited the restaurants in certain areas, such as Port Jefferson, N.Y., in its waterfront area.
Most initiatives were designed to preserve a city's historic character. The Los Angeles bid is one of few that cite residents' health.
The mounting pressure has caused chains to insert healthier food choices in their menus. McDonalds offers salads and low-fat dressings; Burger King stocks Kids Meals with milk and apple pieces.
That's why the restaurant industry says it's unfair to blame them for fat people.
"What's next — security guards at the door saying 'You're overweight, you can't have a cheeseburger'?" Casana said.


Officials: Diet key to obesity epidemic
But public health officials say obesity has reached epidemic proportions in low-income areas such as South Los Angeles and diet is the key reason.
According to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, 30 percent of adults in South Los Angeles area are obese, compared to 19.1 percent for the metropolitan area and 14.1 percent for the affluent westside. Minorities are particularly affected: 28.7 percent of Latinos and 27.7 percent of blacks are obese, compared to 16.6 percent of whites.

Councilwoman Jan Perry, who proposed the measure and represents much of South Los Angeles in her 9th District, says that's no accident. South LA residents lack healthy food options, including grocery stores, fresh produce markets — and full-service restaurants with wait staff and food prepared to order.
A report by the Community Health Councils found 73 percent of South L.A. restaurants were fast food, compared to 42 percent in West Los Angeles.
If the moratorium is passed, Perry wants to lure restaurateurs and grocery retailers to area.
Rebeca Torres, a South Los Angeles mother of four, said she would welcome more dining choices, even if she had to pay a little more. "They should have better things for children," she said. "This fast-food really fattens them up."



cant make this shit up.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
12,563
Tokens
maybe im not as liberal as i thought i was. this is just getting out of control here.
 

NES

Member
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
17,024
Tokens
Why would this be considered a liberal move? I thought it was the Republicans that got off on robbing people of their Freedom of Choice, or freedom in general for that matter.
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
30% obesity rate in the US. We rank #1 world wide.

Not implying anything, I'm just say'n.
 

Officially Punching out Nov 25th
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,482
Tokens
Why would this be considered a liberal move? I thought it was the Republicans that got off on robbing people of their Freedom of Choice, or freedom in general for that matter.

They all do bro...they just go about it in different ways...both sides have the same end result, take your money take your freedoms.
 

NES

Member
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
17,024
Tokens
Thats true KB, but I for one think its a good thing but I dont eat fast food. A nice ban on cigarrettes sales would probably save my life though.
 

Regional Manager, Dunder Mifflin Inc.
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
401
Tokens
Thats true KB, but I for one think its a good thing but I dont eat fast food. A nice ban on cigarrettes sales would probably save my life though.


No, because as an addict you will do anything and everything to find your "fix" most likely. So you will end up buying Black Market smokes in a shady area of town possibly causing multiple instances of becoming a victim of crime to support this habit. Eventually you will move towards easier methods of getting dopamine fixes like DXM (Purple Drank) or some other over the counter method.

Prohibition has done absolutely nothing good for America. Whether it be fast food or drugs. Let the people as a community regulate themselves. The ones that get fat and die, well that to me seems like Natural Selection.
 

Is that a moonbat in my sites?
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
9,064
Tokens
This is merely an observation, but it appears to me that the fattest people are on the dole, while those who work tend to be thinner than the sit on your ass and watch TV while collecting welfare crowd.

Wouldn't it be easier to cut welfare, send the fat slobs out to work and give me back some of my tax money so I can spend it on me and mine at at Wendys or taco Bell?
 

The Great Govenor of California
Joined
Feb 21, 2001
Messages
15,972
Tokens
fast food is not freedom, its is bondage that the us goverment wants you in. The want you dead. California wants you to live. Most Californians hate USA and rightfully so. We were the first to get rid of the SCUMBAGS that smoke.
 

Is that a moonbat in my sites?
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
9,064
Tokens
I have a better idea Railbird - secede from the union and merge with Mexico - 90% of your population is already Mexican, so why not finish the job.

I'd happily support the secession of California from the union and throw ion Colorado for good measure.
 

New member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
231
Tokens
Progressive. How could anyone argue with the elimination of products detrimental to health? Fucking radical liberalist "buyer beware" bullshit.
 

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Tokens
fast food is not freedom, its is bondage that the us goverment wants you in. The want you dead. California wants you to live. Most Californians hate USA and rightfully so. We were the first to get rid of the SCUMBAGS that smoke.
:grandmais
Second actually.

Adolf got rid of smokers first, so you're in good company.
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
I worked at a warehouse half the people were fat as hell and doing 45 hour weeks.

Temptation is too much.
 

New member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
231
Tokens
I worked at a warehouse half the people were fat as hell and doing 45 hour weeks.

Temptation is too much.
Exactly. Liberalism assumes everyone has an IQ greater than 120. People are just too weak and too stupid to make decisions for themselves.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
4,574
Tokens
Politicing to change habits won't work, go to one of the few grocery stores in south central and watch the shit peeps carry out of there, low income peeps will typically buy the cheapest foods with the most filling feeling, and that is the shit of foods, not to mention, the area has been, and is in, a cultural change where over weight runs high in the culture.
 

Regional Manager, Dunder Mifflin Inc.
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
401
Tokens
Exactly. Liberalism assumes everyone has an IQ greater than 120. People are just too weak and too stupid to make decisions for themselves.

Exactly, that is why those in the US are in the economic predicament the are in. Bush had all the answers for those not smart enough to make decisions for themselves.

Do you really think the "Tax Stimulus Plan" was a good idea? Of course not, our national debt increased with that one because we were now releasing more tax money that we collected, but spending more on an inflating dollar.


Vision.. you got the vision for sure.
 

Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
5,905
Tokens
No liberals assume only THEY have an IQ greater than 120 and the rest need their guidance
 

New member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
231
Tokens
Politicing to change habits won't work, go to one of the few grocery stores in south central and watch the shit peeps carry out of there, low income peeps will typically buy the cheapest foods with the most filling feeling, and that is the shit of foods, not to mention, the area has been, and is in, a cultural change where over weight runs high in the culture.
Why? If we taxed unhealthy food 200% do you really think people's habits wouldn't change? Do you really think we can't enforce bans on nasty food?
 

the bear is back biatches!! printing cancel....
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,692
Tokens
its just like everything else with the liberals

whether it be food, smokes, education, the economy, disaster relief, you name it

their answer to it all is more government is better for YOU

when in reality its just better for THEM
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,810
Messages
13,573,528
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com