Kojaks Week 2 MNF (Ytd 8-6)

[Kojak 1,875]

Coming off of 5-2 weekend so far.

Eagles +3- believe many will be jumping on Colts here needing win plus how poorly Eagles played in 1st half vs Jags Lw. Fact is that Eagles have edge vs Colts in nearly all areas besides quarterback and even that is debateable
if you compare numbers. Eagles offense is tough to prepare for if you had not seen it. Difference in end will be McCoy and Eagles running game that should be able to control clock once they get lead. Colts since end of ly have struggled and it continues here.

Eagles/Colts over 54- There is going to be a lot of fireworks in this game. Should be very entertaining.

 

[palehose1 0]

Andrew Luck is 10-0 after a loss That's a strong Trend. Philly`s def is suspect also IMO GL Though.

 

[Twisted 2,560]

Agree on both but sticking with total play for now.

I'd wish you luck but......will just say SWEEP!!! :Carcajada:

 

[Twisted 2,560]

Andrew Luck is 10-0 after a loss That's a strong Trend. Philly`s def is suspect also IMO GL Though.

Philly's D is suspect?!?!?! They are better than the Colts D stop with the useless stats already they will cloud your judgement.

 

[palehose1 0]

Philly's D is suspect?!?!?! They are better than the Colts D stop with the useless stats already they will cloud your judgement.

Not saying Philly`s Def is bad but think Luck can put 30-35 on them in Indy based on his 10-0 after loss trend, I don't see Indy losing tonight I think -3 and 54 are too tight to wager though GL
Philly`s def is used to playing with a lead ,,,,Prob not the case TONIGHT.

 

[palehose1 0]

Luck being 10-0 after a loss is a useless stat LOL Is there any usefull ones? LOL

 

[Kojak 1,875]

Bears had not won or covered in SF since 1985, how did that one hold up. Trends should be used to amplify your bet. Still need to analyze game, cap it, before looking at trends or other. These things only should be helping you increase or decrease your wager or to get off of it.

 

[varkeyboy 2,885]

On that OVER for MNF! But I got it at 53 on 5D.

 

[Kojak 1,875]

Great number.

 

[Twisted 2,560]

Get ready to grab it even lower Every time they lower it I plan on adding. I don't know who loves the under so much but someone is hitting it. Maybe we should say BW hit the under so we get a better number lol

 

[Factor15 1,990]

Kojak, Its great to see some old faces on this board again. You always come thru with great picks and analysis. What ever happened to Old Man Ted or Cold Weather? Those guys were solid too.

 

[ComebackKid31 0]

I would actually stake my name here on it being UNDER 54 tonight. Philly will not score like needed to hit this. 31-17 Colts will be the flavor. 54 is a ton of points. Be careful. It's not so much Colts D being good but foles is not the foles from last year neither is the eagles offense.

 

[JinnRikki 0]

Not saying Philly`s Def is bad but think Luck can put 30-35 on them in Indy based on his 10-0 after loss trend, I don't see Indy losing tonight I think -3 and 54 are too tight to wager though GL
Philly`s def is used to playing with a lead ,,,,Prob not the case TONIGHT.

You mean like the "lead" they had last week against the Jags going into the half down 17 then coming out after the break and shutting down Jax offense? :think2:

 

[palehose1 0]

Bears had not won or covered in SF since 1985, how did that one hold up. Trends should be used to amplify your bet. Still need to analyze game, cap it, before looking at trends or other. These things only should be helping you increase or decrease your wager or to get off of it.

Agree ,however I see Indy as the better team and we are seeing that Good Playoff teams don't go 0-2 Esp coming home Indy by 3-7 IMO GL

 

[palehose1 0]

You mean like the "lead" they had last week against the Jags going into the half down 17 then coming out after the break and shutting down Jax offense? :think2:

THE fact that they had to come from behind to beat Jags enhances my Indy play and last yrs def stats were achieved by playing with large leads

 

[JinnRikki 0]

No disrespect but I'll take my stats from last week as opposed to last year when Kelly was still getting this team sorted out.

 

[Dude 1,600]

Agree ,however I see Indy as the better team and we are seeing that Good Playoff teams don't go 0-2 Esp coming home Indy by 3-7 IMO GL

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Teams that go winless in August generally don't go on to play many games in January. Since 1994, 39 teams have finished the preseason without a win. Just nine went on to have winning regular seasons and only three of those nine would win a playoff game.[/FONT][/FONT]

 

[Recon792 0]

all the best tonight Kojak

 

[XSPower 2,975]

Thanks and good luck tonight!!!!

 

[sunshine11 1,855]

Good luck to you tonight. Very good information. I did see a trend that is 0-15 to the under. No kidding.