Thanks IS. Glad to see someone is benefitting from my work here.
I had every intention of posting for all the games last night, but around 8:30 I got a call from a old high school friend and we chatted for like 1 1/2 hours. I checked out the 10:30 games and saw nothing I liked, then I went back to check out the games I missed. Turns out I would've played San Ant -10 and Utah +8. San Ant won by 33 but Utah lost by 10 in O.T., so I would've gone 1-1. It would've been painful to lose on an 8 point dog in O.T., so it was a case of good furtune that I (we?) missed those games, but at the same time it tells me that my capping was good.
You might be surprised to know that I DON'T use any other factors in capping games. I used to, but I discovered I was missing more winners than losers by withholding plays when the other capping info contradicted the ref data. I am convinced that referees have a bigger impact on basketball capping than any other sport for several reasons:
1. Virtually every possession there is a call/no call decision to be made. With over a hundred possessions per game, if a certain ref is more inclined to call charging rather than blocking fouls or if he is more inclined to swallow his whistle you can see how huge his impact can be, especially on totals. Think about it - sports like hockey and foots average around 10-15 penalties per game, whereas your typical game of roundball will see 50 fouls or more.
2. Since there are 3 refs for each game, and realizing that each of them have equal influence, if you can find three with similar tendancies, then their already large impact is multiplied. Other sports like baseball have multiple umps too, but the influence of the home plate ump is vastly more important than any of the others. Therefore there is no multiplying effect in baseball.
3. The umps in baseball are also known far in advance, sometimes days in advance. This makes it much easier for cappers to factor their influence into the line. Watch what happens to the over/under in a baseball game when Doug Eddings is announced as home plate ump. Hoops, on the other hand, doesn't announce ref matchups until 5 minutes before G.T. So even though it is aggravating to wait right up to the last minute to get the info, it is probably just as well, because the announcement doesn't move the line.
This is all confirmed in my data on the refs. Some refs have ATS results that are consistent every year. For example, Joe Crawford and Kevin Fehr have made money for "under" bettors every year for the last 8 years.
A word of warning here, though. My results have been impressive so far, but PLEASE don't wager beyond your means. I stand behind my capping, but I am certainly not immune to a bad streak. It would be one thing for me to lose my OWN money, but knowing that my recommendations would be causing OTHERS to lose money would be extremely disconcerting, especially if they were plunking down huge wads of cash on each play.