Jman, i still rate duke #1, kent #2, Uconn #3, and all these teams are highly beatable.. due to high school players going to the nba early, the teams are weaker and parity is really there. It was a joke to see St Joes, Stanford and Gonzaga, one two and three in the polls before the tourneys..
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Journeyman:
This team would not have been a top ten team back in the early 90's...Watch out for the lower seeds...this will be the year one or two go all the way to the Final Four...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
WOW JMAN I do not think I have ever disagreed more with you then I do on this ....KY is on a HUGE ROLL...they are rolling teams since they lost to GA and also winning close games, the LAMBASTED the gators sunday
This team would not have been a top ten team back in the early 90's...Watch out for the lower seeds...this will be the year one or two go all the way to the Final Four...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
WOW JMAN I do not think I have ever disagreed more with you then I do on this ....KY is on a HUGE ROLL...they are rolling teams since they lost to GA and also winning close games, the LAMBASTED the gators sunday
Dante- I admit they are rolling and I have noticed you are high on them....I wonder though how well they will do in a tight game in the half court offense, it seems they lack scorers...
I will admit I soured on them after several poor offensive showings earlier in the year...Its really wide open though, I have never seen it so watered down..
I will admit I soured on them after several poor offensive showings earlier in the year...Its really wide open though, I have never seen it so watered down..
Watch out DM, as I think Wash could & should definitely be the play if a fat to fair line is hung, but Ky is really rotating the rock right now, spotting up & knocking down treys, and is much more physical and quick, than what the Huskies are familiar with to a man.
UK has(as Journey noted) stepped it up and out after Fitch returned, as he is helping open up and mix in others, which has fed to increased overall intensity, in contrast to earlier this year, when it was all Hayes and Fitch.
St.Joe will be the first #1 to go, I like Martelli/Big-Five, but Packer is right..reality is coming and soon!
UK has(as Journey noted) stepped it up and out after Fitch returned, as he is helping open up and mix in others, which has fed to increased overall intensity, in contrast to earlier this year, when it was all Hayes and Fitch.
St.Joe will be the first #1 to go, I like Martelli/Big-Five, but Packer is right..reality is coming and soon!
KENTUCKY is clearly deserving of a NUMBER 1 SEED and they are most insider's choice to WIN the BIG DANCE...
The committee emphasizes play during the FINAL few weeks of the season and given that, Kentucky has much more of a chance to WIN it ALL than ST. Joseph's (the weakest number 1 seed)...
Personally, I think it's a joke to give St. Joe's a number 1 seed even though they had such a great record...
When virtually no one thinks they will get to the FINAL FOUR, then why are they a number 1?
THE SHRINK
The committee emphasizes play during the FINAL few weeks of the season and given that, Kentucky has much more of a chance to WIN it ALL than ST. Joseph's (the weakest number 1 seed)...
Personally, I think it's a joke to give St. Joe's a number 1 seed even though they had such a great record...
When virtually no one thinks they will get to the FINAL FOUR, then why are they a number 1?
THE SHRINK
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by THE SHRINK:
KENTUCKY is clearly deserving of a NUMBER 1 SEED and they are most insider's choice to WIN the BIG DANCE...
The committee emphasizes play during the FINAL few weeks of the season and given that, Kentucky has much more of a chance to WIN it ALL than ST. Joseph's (the weakest number 1 seed)...
Personally, I think it's a joke to give St. Joe's a number 1 seed even though they had such a great record...
When virtually no one thinks they will get to the FINAL FOUR, then why are they a number 1?
THE SHRINK<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
MY GOD im learning something I said this before Shrinkwrap! By Dante <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>WOW JMAN I do not think I have ever disagreed more with you then I do on this ....KY is on a HUGE ROLL...they are rolling teams since they lost to GA and also winning close games, the LAMBASTED the gators sunday <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
KENTUCKY is clearly deserving of a NUMBER 1 SEED and they are most insider's choice to WIN the BIG DANCE...
The committee emphasizes play during the FINAL few weeks of the season and given that, Kentucky has much more of a chance to WIN it ALL than ST. Joseph's (the weakest number 1 seed)...
Personally, I think it's a joke to give St. Joe's a number 1 seed even though they had such a great record...
When virtually no one thinks they will get to the FINAL FOUR, then why are they a number 1?
THE SHRINK<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
MY GOD im learning something I said this before Shrinkwrap! By Dante <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>WOW JMAN I do not think I have ever disagreed more with you then I do on this ....KY is on a HUGE ROLL...they are rolling teams since they lost to GA and also winning close games, the LAMBASTED the gators sunday <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Shrink-
I think the committee did the right thing in awarding the #1 to St. Joe. They rewarded them for their perfect season and its a nice story. Now there are no excuses for them they have the preferred path to the final 4.
With all the public sentiment against St. Joe I bet we are going to "have" to be on them alot while they are in.
I think the committee did the right thing in awarding the #1 to St. Joe. They rewarded them for their perfect season and its a nice story. Now there are no excuses for them they have the preferred path to the final 4.
With all the public sentiment against St. Joe I bet we are going to "have" to be on them alot while they are in.
