John F. Kerry man of the people??

[PatPatriot]

There is no contradiction in being a Billionaire Socialist. Not if all you care about is Raw Power. Power for the Sake of Power.

You make your billions, or inherit your billions, or marry your billions (Kerry), and then you use the money to promise the stupid masses that you will fight on their side against the Evil Corporations. You spend a tiny portion of your Billions on building up this image of yourself as a Class Warrior, on the Side of the Downtrodden.

Then when you are in power, you help establish a Socialist Elite (as in Europe) in which the uppidity middle class (the real villains of the piece) are prevented from making the obscene gains in wealth that are so distressing to the Aristocratic Few. So you wreck the economy and build huge social-welfare structures, which you then administer from Olympian Heights.

You see, handled correctly, being a Billionaire isn't just a stepping stone to Aristocratic Power, it is the road to the Divine Right of Kings.

European Aristocracy and European Socialism are locked in a tight embrace. With the small-business-middle-class squeezed into submission.

This is the vision Ketchup King Kerry has for these United States.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> taken from another post, Pat Patriot. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

 

[PatPatriot]

Remember this....Kerry want to raise taxes on peoples INCOMES of more than 200,000, this would NOT include him, he already has his.

This is from a guy that gave 0$ to charity in 1991 and 1995.

 

[D2bets]

Is that John Kerry's money or his wife's? If HE really had over 200 million bucks then why did he need to take out a 6 million dollar loan to finance his campaign? I think that's his wife's bucks, not his, and I'd bet anything that she has his balls by an airtight prenup.

Patriot, so I take it you'd find it admirable if Kerry proposed an annual wealth tax on people's net holdings becausr that would effect him more directly?

 

[Mr NJ Sports]

He married her to get her $.

And what kind of woman remarries after their husband gets killed?

 

[Massmilwaukee]

Yeah, those damn widows who want to remarry... they should be bludgeoned to death.

 

[jointpleasures]

Kerry idolizes the Kennedy's, he feels his chair in his kingship should rightfully belong to him. A picture of Kerry in Roman armor rather than American military garb would be much more realistic.

 

[Mr NJ Sports]

/Yeah, those damn widows who want to remarry... they should be bludgeoned to death./


You get married and then your spouse is killed ..You all of a sudden fall right back in love with someone enough to marry them also?

Same as that Paul Mccartney..what did he wait 3 days before remarrying?

 

[PatPatriot]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Patriot, so I take it you'd find it admirable if Kerry proposed an annual wealth tax on people's net holdings becausr that would effect him more directly? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
D2 He is taxing INCOME...INCOME.Not money he already has...In other word he can have money but someone in small buissness MUST be taxed.

 

[JudgeWapner]

He has to be a man of the people,he doesn't wear a tie.

 

[PatPatriot]

Judge....Dohhh!!

 

[D2bets]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Patriot:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Patriot, so I take it you'd find it admirable if Kerry proposed an annual wealth tax on people's net holdings becausr that would effect him more directly? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
D2 He is taxing INCOME...INCOME.Not money he already has...In other word he can have money but someone in small buissness MUST be taxed.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I realize that. That's why I'm asking you...would you find it more admirable if he proposed taxing money he (or his wife) already has? Somehow I doubt it. And again, it's his wife's money, not his.

 

[WINNINGHAND]

Lesser of two evils.

 

[UncleMoneybags]

winninghand,

I want Bush out. However, I'll be voting for him because Kerry is such a sniveling a$$wipe who can't hold an opinion to save his life. I probably would have voted for Edwards had he received the nod and maybe even Dean. Dean's crazy but at least you know some of his stances. I can't say that for Kerry. Hopefully a decent third party candidate will run so I can vote with a clear conscience.

 

[Oceans11]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Remember this....Kerry want to raise taxes on peoples INCOMES of more than 200,000, this would NOT include him, he already has his.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

If you have an income of over $200,000 a year then what the fukk are you worrying about???

As it is, the US is one of the cheapest places in the developed world for stuff like gas/food taxes etc.

And it WILL include him because that cash/assets generates income like bank interest and divvis.

Knee-jerk stuff, with no thought...

Keep it simple...Just say....
"I hate Kerry, GWB is my hero."

 

[PatPatriot]

In other words eek...your saying that a small buisness making 200K a year should be prevented for making as much as Kerry??
Why should they be sanctioned for working hard??...Why must they have infrigments on their freedom of attempting to make money?...Whos who to say one has too much to have more?...Does this mean that a guy with a small buis. should layoff workers to make up for tax hikes??

 

[Oceans11]

The people on this planet who are pulling in over $200k p.a. are amongst that group of people that I least worry about...
They're well able to look after themselves.
You can't make money like that unless you are more than capable of screwing over your fellow human beings.
(They also rank amongst the most priveliged on Planet earth.)

And don't give me that employers love employees crap.
If they could make the same cash without ANY employees they would get rid of them all anyway.

-------------------------------------

Footnote:
You could call this kind of thing a bleeding heart subject that the righties embrace.

 

[dickman]

I am not surprised about Kerry but feel much more sorry for Kucinich. No wonder why he wants to lower taxes for the lower and middle class. Obviously, the reason is so that he can also benefit.

Check out his numbers.