It does not make much sense to go ahead with this betting and money management system. I think 88 parlays over 44 days is enough for testing, and to have the conclusion that this is a losing system.
Yesterday I have done a run of all these results for the case if these would have been no parlays, but just single bets, each risking 1 Unit, on the same lines and odds (4 single bets every day). The overall for that would have been: W 83 (82.5) - L 49 - P 44 => L 4.875 U. That stat also being in the red, is even more clear indication that this is a losing method in the long run.
No matter how many "automatic" betting methods I tried over the years, like this one - with zero handicapping involved (in this case just looking at the odds), none have ever worked. Some have shown overall results turning solidly into the red after just a few weeks, others even just after 7-8 months. A lots of time lost, but these are fun to try. It's like searching for the holy grail of betting, which of course does nor exist.
The conclusion is logical - no such "system" without any real handicapping would ever work in the long run, because in that case everyone would use such systems, and the bookies would be out of business in no time.
As I posted in my opening post of this thread, I used a small bankroll of $1,000 here, so I have lost an insignificant $$.
