Jake's Picks - Week 1 College Football (constantly adding stuff)

Search

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Keep an eye out. I cap every game and have had alot of success over the years for what it's worth.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
UTEP +3 -110

UTEP has to figure out how to fill the holes on the offensive line but their offensive playcalling makes up for the loss somewhat. Buffalo's defense has some guys back but lost their best players and is going to be worse than last year. Buffalo's offense has almost everyone back and on the surface, you'd think they were going against a crap defense because of last year's numbers. Not so, says I. UTEP has alot of guys back including a good amount of talent returning on the defensive line and I expect lots of improvement from that unit. The Miners win this one on the road.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
South Carolina -11.5 -110

This one should be a route. South Carolina needs a new QB but they have a stud offensive line that is going to absolutely bully NC State's D line. 300 running yards shouldn't be that hard if the Cocks want it. NC State has too many young guys on offense and South Carolina's D will be causing turnovers all day long. Look for a big improved from the SC D this season. I have this one as 38-13 and this line should be -17.5 or more.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Stanford +4 -110

The Cardinals are at home and just have a ton more guys coming back. Oregon St has almost no one on D coming back even though I do really like their JUCO DE Kuli. Stanford has their offensive line cemented and should move the ball enough to score some points. On offense, Oregon St doesn't really bring much back either and neither of their QBs are impressing me. Stanford's defense brings almost everyone back as well. Experience plus home field advantage makes this one automatic. 24-23 Cardinals.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
1,549
Tokens
South Carolina -11.5 -110

This one should be a route. South Carolina needs a new QB but they have a stud offensive line that is going to absolutely bully NC State's D line. 300 running yards shouldn't be that hard if the Cocks want it. NC State has too many young guys on offense and South Carolina's D will be causing turnovers all day long. Look for a big improved from the SC D this season. I have this one as 38-13 and this line should be -17.5 or more.


I am a SC alum and I am clueless as to what stud OL you are talking about. Their best OL (Jamon Meredith) has to sit the first 2 games of the year. His backup, Hutch Eckerson has a minor knee injury and if he can't go by game time, his replacement who is similar in talent is Quentin Richardson, a R-Frosh. The only spots going into the opener on the OL that are set in stone as of today are RT and RG. The rest are up for competition.

Now with all that said, I do think this line is light and thats because I have NC St scoring a MAX of 13 points but more like 10 or less in this one. The SC defense with a healthy Jasper Brinkley, Nathan Pepper, Captain Munnerlyn and Jordin Lindsey back from suspension is a completely different animal than what they put out there at the end of last year. I don't see State successfully throwing on SC and Ellis Johnson is an upgrade at DC.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
I am a SC alum and I am clueless as to what stud OL you are talking about. Their best OL (Jamon Meredith) has to sit the first 2 games of the year. His backup, Hutch Eckerson has a minor knee injury and if he can't go by game time, his replacement who is similar in talent is Quentin Richardson, a R-Frosh. The only spots going into the opener on the OL that are set in stone as of today are RT and RG. The rest are up for competition.

Now with all that said, I do think this line is light and thats because I have NC St scoring a MAX of 13 points but more like 10 or less in this one. The SC defense with a healthy Jasper Brinkley, Nathan Pepper, Captain Munnerlyn and Jordin Lindsey back from suspension is a completely different animal than what they put out there at the end of last year. I don't see State successfully throwing on SC and Ellis Johnson is an upgrade at DC.

Sorry... meant stud offensive line compared to NC State's defensive line. Sometimes I type too fast for my own good. I think your squad has a very nice year on both sides of the ball. I'm liking what I've seen so far.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
1,549
Tokens
Sorry... meant stud offensive line compared to NC State's defensive line. Sometimes I type too fast for my own good. I think your squad has a very nice year on both sides of the ball. I'm liking what I've seen so far.


fair enough


State will have 3 new LB's and Spurrier will def try to exploit them with the TE's and RB's. We do agree on this play though and I am really pumped up about the defense, provided everyone stays healthy.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 26, 2008
Messages
782
Tokens
Stanford +4 -110

The Cardinals are at home and just have a ton more guys coming back. Oregon St has almost no one on D coming back even though I do really like their JUCO DE Kuli. Stanford has their offensive line cemented and should move the ball enough to score some points. On offense, Oregon St doesn't really bring much back either and neither of their QBs are impressing me. Stanford's defense brings almost everyone back as well. Experience plus home field advantage makes this one automatic. 24-23 Cardinals.


It doesn't look likely that kuli makes the field in week 1. So that should make you even happier. He may end up even redshirting.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 26, 2008
Messages
782
Tokens
UTEP +3 -110

UTEP has to figure out how to fill the holes on the offensive line but their offensive playcalling makes up for the loss somewhat. Buffalo's defense has some guys back but lost their best players and is going to be worse than last year. Buffalo's offense has almost everyone back and on the surface, you'd think they were going against a crap defense because of last year's numbers. Not so, says I. UTEP has alot of guys back including a good amount of talent returning on the defensive line and I expect lots of improvement from that unit. The Miners win this one on the road.


I like this team to win straight up as well and am a bit perplexed at the love this buffalo team is receiving on team boards and handicapping boards.
 

Hang em and Bang Em
Joined
Sep 5, 2006
Messages
1,186
Tokens
Good luck this year Jake. Work hard and don't be afraid of a bad stretch...fight through those your a winning capper.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
It doesn't look likely that kuli makes the field in week 1. So that should make you even happier. He may end up even redshirting.

Any word on what would keep him off the field? I tried to find info but found nothing...
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
I like this team to win straight up as well and am a bit perplexed at the love this buffalo team is receiving on team boards and handicapping boards.

Yeah that line really confused me. Normally if it looks like such a blatant trap I'll lay off completely but I just couldn't on that one. UTEP has a ton less guys coming back but alot more talent and a proven winning formula that Buffalo can't touch. GL this season.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Good luck this year Jake. Work hard and don't be afraid of a bad stretch...fight through those your a winning capper.

Thanks for the well wishes and that is some great advice which I will take to heart. Hope ya crush the books this season brotha.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Baylor Bears +13 -110

Wake's offensive line needs alot of help to get the skill players the time they need. Baylor's defense isn't great either but is decent and the switch to a 4-3 will help. On offense, Baylor has almost everyone back including an upgrade at QB and should be a much improved unit. Wake's defense looks good as well but with the loss of two guys on the D-line, I think Baylor can get a good push on offense. At home, 13 points is just too much.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Alabama Crimson Tide +5 -110

Bama is solid on both sides of the ball. Clemson has a good D but the offense is going to have some issues. That offensive line is in bad shape and three new guys are being worked in. The Clemson D Line destroyed the O line in the spring and Bama should be able to do the same thing. All the skill players in the world are not going to be able to do anything without an offensive line to give them time. Crimson are strong on both sides and the more rounded team. +3 or better is good value.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
2,864
Tokens
Baylor Bears +13 -110

Wake's offensive line needs alot of help to get the skill players the time they need. Baylor's defense isn't great either but is decent and the switch to a 4-3 will help. On offense, Baylor has almost everyone back including an upgrade at QB and should be a much improved unit. Wake's defense looks good as well but with the loss of two guys on the D-line, I think Baylor can get a good push on offense. At home, 13 points is just too much.


Careful with this one . . . . Baylor may have 9 offensive starters coming back but they only averaged 18 ppg last season and they are all having to learn completely new offensive schemes with their new coach. I see no value in playing Baylor this game, but I will not play the game at all so good luck to you.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Careful with this one . . . . Baylor may have 9 offensive starters coming back but they only averaged 18 ppg last season and they are all having to learn completely new offensive schemes with their new coach. I see no value in playing Baylor this game, but I will not play the game at all so good luck to you.

You do have a point but they ran somewhat of the same offense last season too. Actually, their offense last year was pretty similar the more I think about it. New plays but the offense hasn't changed too much.

Good luck this year BTW. What you on so far brotha?
 

AKA BeavaBleeda
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
355
Tokens
Any word on what would keep him off the field? I tried to find info but found nothing...

The latest word on Kuli is there a chance he could be academically ineligible. We still don't know for sure and he could surface on campus in September or it could be January. I guess a redshirt is a possibility, but I'm praying that he plays this year. My Beavs need him. Depth is a major issue this year at many positions. Even though depth is an issue, I think come week 1 they should be healthy enough to have more talent than Stanford. A big concern is Jeremy Perry on the OL. If we don't have him I'm nervous.

I hate to admit it, but if you got Stanford at +4 you do have a little value. But, hold off on your bet till you see who OSU put out there on the offensive line come gameday. QB and the line are BIG concerns now.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,986
Messages
13,575,785
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com