Think about the 2 people calling others losers
Dave007-- Busted lying about Obama birth certificate, supporting terrorists, supporting child molestors, getting banned for a year because he bet me that Romney would beat Obama, Trump supporter
Gas Man--- wrong all day long, has vitterd stamp across his forehead, has his teeth knocked out by me several times a month.... Yet he keeps coming back for more.
Ive knocked you out so many times I dont know how you keep getting off the mat. Ill give you credit though you have less sense than DaFinch.
You see how completely stupid your posts sound? Is that the 250th or 260th time you have posted something about nothing?
Yawnnn...your rhetoric is soooo bad.
You see how completely stupid your posts sound? Is that the 250th or 260th time you have posted something about nothing?
Yawnnn...your rhetoric is soooo bad.
You're like a boxer who is getting beaten from pillar to post, gets up after yet ANOTHER knockdown, and when the ref looks in his eyes and asks how he is, he says, "Never better! Right as rain!" You're a blubbery bellied, limp dick loser who is brain dead but keeps on walking around-and, when Hillary dons the strap on and crams it up your ass and the asses of about a dozen other right wing whack jobs around here, I'll be RIGHT here to rub it in your fact. Suck cock, bitch.
Dafinch
RX Senior
This message is hidden because Dafinch is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list
Im going to go and guess ( so far Im about 20 for 20 on these I betting), that this is the usual insult post, with homosexual tendencies to either give another guy head or have anal sex... while offering no real rebuttal or facts.
RX Senior
This message is hidden because Dafinch is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list
Im going to go and guess ( so far Im about 20 for 20 on these I betting), that this is the usual insult post, with homosexual tendencies to either give another guy head or have anal sex... while offering no real rebuttal or facts.
In some ways, you're the biggest idiot here-and, in THIS forum, that takes some doing: first, I'd never seen anybody reply to their own post, with a "lol," no less(until the hillbilly from Virginia, Mountain, recently did it, and at least he tried to play if off as a "double post"). It's hard to put into words how stupid that is-except when it's compared to putting somebody on "ignore," then eagerly pumping other posters on what was said by the "ignored" poster. You are a moron of epic proportions, Scumbag.
Ahhh, cancelled rallies because of Nazi-lie supporters in Chicago. Good to see they arrested that gutless old cocksucker who sucker punched the protest last night. In '68 at the Convention, the protesters chanted, "the whole world's watching!" and the party that held that convention didn't fare will in the fall. The rest of Drumph's rallies should prove...interesting. Next time they may have to kill him, whatta scumbag...http://www.insideedition.com/headlin...ve-to-kill-him
You do realize that the bloody 1968 convention held in Chicago was the Democratic Convention and that fall Richard Nixon defeated Humphrey in a landslide.
You really are a perverted idiot. Here is the posts in question. I answered your post for you since you couldn't search Google fast enough to find out what everyone on here already knows.....you are a greasy, sick, bestiality driven bastard. The day you post anything negative about a Dem, even something from 1968 is the day you will cold cock a Black Lives Matter dude at a Trump Rally
You mad bro? Still pissed that a mod outed you about living in Vegas?
Vile, disgusting Breitbart.com can't even stand behind their own reporter, but rather has sold out to be the TASS and RT to Drumpf. Sad.
Michelle Fields, Ben Shapiro Resign From Breitbart
“Today I informed the management at Breitbart News of my immediate resignation,” the reporter at the center of the controversy at the conservative site told BuzzFeed News, the week after Trump’s campaign manager allegedly grabbed her.
posted on Mar. 14, 2016, at 12:20 a.m.
Rosie GrayBuzzFeed News Reporter
McKay CoppinsBuzzFeed Staff
Washington Post / Getty Images
Breitbart reporter Michelle Fields and editor-at-large Ben Shapiro are resigning from the company over the site’s handling of Donald Trump’s campaign manager’salleged assault on Fields, BuzzFeed News has learned.
Fields and Shapiro informed Breitbart News chair Steve Bannon of their decision Sunday night.
“Today I informed the management at Breitbart News of my immediate resignation,” Fields said in a statement sent to BuzzFeed News. “I do not believe Breitbart News has adequately stood by me during the events of the past week and because of that I believe it is now best for us to part ways.”
In his own statement, Shapiro said the episode was emblematic of how he believes the site’s management had sold out the legacy of its founder and namesake, the late Andrew Breitbart.
“Andrew’s life mission has been betrayed,” Shapiro wrote. “Indeed, Breitbart News, under the chairmanship of Steve Bannon, has put a stake through the heart of Andrew’s legacy. In my opinion, Steve Bannon is a bully, and has sold out Andrew’s mission in order to back another bully, Donald Trump; he has shaped the company into Trump’s personal Pravda, to the extent that he abandoned and undercut his own reporter, Breitbart News’ Michelle Fields, in order to protect Trump’s bully campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, who allegedly assaulted Michelle.”
Breitbart has been riven by internal strife in recent days after Trump’s campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, allegedly grabbed Fields and yanked her away from Trump as she was attempting to ask him a question after a press conference in Florida. The Trump campaign denied the incident, despite considerable evidence to the contrary.
Breitbart published a story casting doubt on Fields’ account, appearing to side with the Trump campaign over their own reporter. Joel Pollak, a senior editor-at-large at the organization, ordered staffers to stop defending Fields. One source with knowledge of the situation said some staffers who publicly defended Fields had been threatened with firing.
“Both Lewandowski and Trump maligned Michelle in the most repulsive fashion,” Shapiro wrote in his resignation statement. “Meanwhile, Breitbart News not only stood by and did nothing outside of tepidly asking for an apology, they then attempted to abandon Michelle by silencing staff from tweeting or talking about the issue. Finally, in the ultimate indignity, they undermined Michelle completely by running a poorly-evidenced conspiracy theory as their lead story in which Michelle and Terris had somehow misidentified Lewandowski.”
The exodus, which began with the company’s spokesman Kurt Bardella, is unlikely to end with Fields and Shapiro. Three sources say multiple staffers are searching for a way out of the company — with several actively circulating résumés, according to two sources — and more resignations could follow in the coming days and weeks. The company is known for having editorial employees sign unusually strict contracts, at least some of which include non-compete clauses that could make it difficult to leave Breitbart for another news outlet.
Relations between Bannon and the site’s staff — which were already fraught with tension over the direction and editorial vision for the company — have deteriorated sharply over the episode with the Trump campaign. According to one company source with knowledge of the situation, some editors have discussed telling Breitbart News CEO Larry Solov they will quit unless Bannon is ousted. Solov did not immediately respond to a request for comment Sunday night.
Here’s Shapiro’s full resignation statement:
Michelle Fields, Ben Shapiro Resign From Breitbart
“Today I informed the management at Breitbart News of my immediate resignation,” the reporter at the center of the controversy at the conservative site told BuzzFeed News, the week after Trump’s campaign manager allegedly grabbed her.
posted on Mar. 14, 2016, at 12:20 a.m.
Rosie GrayBuzzFeed News Reporter
McKay CoppinsBuzzFeed Staff
Washington Post / Getty Images
Breitbart reporter Michelle Fields and editor-at-large Ben Shapiro are resigning from the company over the site’s handling of Donald Trump’s campaign manager’salleged assault on Fields, BuzzFeed News has learned.
Fields and Shapiro informed Breitbart News chair Steve Bannon of their decision Sunday night.
“Today I informed the management at Breitbart News of my immediate resignation,” Fields said in a statement sent to BuzzFeed News. “I do not believe Breitbart News has adequately stood by me during the events of the past week and because of that I believe it is now best for us to part ways.”
In his own statement, Shapiro said the episode was emblematic of how he believes the site’s management had sold out the legacy of its founder and namesake, the late Andrew Breitbart.
“Andrew’s life mission has been betrayed,” Shapiro wrote. “Indeed, Breitbart News, under the chairmanship of Steve Bannon, has put a stake through the heart of Andrew’s legacy. In my opinion, Steve Bannon is a bully, and has sold out Andrew’s mission in order to back another bully, Donald Trump; he has shaped the company into Trump’s personal Pravda, to the extent that he abandoned and undercut his own reporter, Breitbart News’ Michelle Fields, in order to protect Trump’s bully campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, who allegedly assaulted Michelle.”
Breitbart has been riven by internal strife in recent days after Trump’s campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, allegedly grabbed Fields and yanked her away from Trump as she was attempting to ask him a question after a press conference in Florida. The Trump campaign denied the incident, despite considerable evidence to the contrary.
Breitbart published a story casting doubt on Fields’ account, appearing to side with the Trump campaign over their own reporter. Joel Pollak, a senior editor-at-large at the organization, ordered staffers to stop defending Fields. One source with knowledge of the situation said some staffers who publicly defended Fields had been threatened with firing.
“Both Lewandowski and Trump maligned Michelle in the most repulsive fashion,” Shapiro wrote in his resignation statement. “Meanwhile, Breitbart News not only stood by and did nothing outside of tepidly asking for an apology, they then attempted to abandon Michelle by silencing staff from tweeting or talking about the issue. Finally, in the ultimate indignity, they undermined Michelle completely by running a poorly-evidenced conspiracy theory as their lead story in which Michelle and Terris had somehow misidentified Lewandowski.”
The exodus, which began with the company’s spokesman Kurt Bardella, is unlikely to end with Fields and Shapiro. Three sources say multiple staffers are searching for a way out of the company — with several actively circulating résumés, according to two sources — and more resignations could follow in the coming days and weeks. The company is known for having editorial employees sign unusually strict contracts, at least some of which include non-compete clauses that could make it difficult to leave Breitbart for another news outlet.
Relations between Bannon and the site’s staff — which were already fraught with tension over the direction and editorial vision for the company — have deteriorated sharply over the episode with the Trump campaign. According to one company source with knowledge of the situation, some editors have discussed telling Breitbart News CEO Larry Solov they will quit unless Bannon is ousted. Solov did not immediately respond to a request for comment Sunday night.
Here’s Shapiro’s full resignation statement:
As a close personal friend and mentee of Andrew Breitbart’s, it saddens me tremendously to announce that as of 9:00 p.m. Pacific Time, I have resigned from Breitbart News as editor-at-large. I met Andrew Breitbart when I was seventeen years old and remained his friend until his tragic death; I signed on with Breitbart News two weeks before Andrew’s death because I believed in his mission.
I am proud of what we accomplished in the years following his death, fighting back against the leftist media and debunking the left’s key narratives. I have many good friends at Breitbart News, including editor-in-chief Alex Marlow and editor-at-large John Nolte, and I admire CEO Larry Solov for his dedication to ensuring a financial future for Andrew’s widow, Susie, and his four children.
Andrew built his life and his career on one mission: fight the bullies. But Andrew’s life mission has been betrayed. Indeed, Breitbart News, under the chairmanship of Steve Bannon, has put a stake through the heart of Andrew’s legacy. In my opinion, Steve Bannon is a bully, and has sold out Andrew’s mission in order to back another bully, Donald Trump; he has shaped the company into Trump’s personal Pravda, to the extent that he abandoned and undercut his own reporter, Breitbart News’ Michelle Fields, in order to protect Trump’s bully campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, who allegedly assaulted Michelle. I spoke with Michelle the night after the incident. She told me her story. That story was backed by audiotape, eyewitness testimony from The Washington Post’s Ben Terris, physical bruises, and video tape.
Both Lewandowski and Trump maligned Michelle in the most repulsive fashion. Meanwhile, Breitbart News not only stood by and did nothing outside of tepidly asking for an apology, they then attempted to abandon Michelle by silencing staff from tweeting or talking about the issue. Finally, in the ultimate indignity, they undermined Michelle completely by running a poorly-evidenced conspiracy theory as their lead story in which Michelle and Terris had somehow misidentified Lewandowski.
This is disgusting. Andrew never would have stood for it. No news outlet would stand for it.
Nobody should.
This truly breaks my heart. But, as I am fond of saying, facts don’t care about your feelings, and the facts are undeniable: Breitbart News has become precisely the reverse of what Andrew would have wanted. Steve Bannon and those who follow his lead should be ashamed of themselves.
Here’s Fields’ full resignation statement:I am proud of what we accomplished in the years following his death, fighting back against the leftist media and debunking the left’s key narratives. I have many good friends at Breitbart News, including editor-in-chief Alex Marlow and editor-at-large John Nolte, and I admire CEO Larry Solov for his dedication to ensuring a financial future for Andrew’s widow, Susie, and his four children.
Andrew built his life and his career on one mission: fight the bullies. But Andrew’s life mission has been betrayed. Indeed, Breitbart News, under the chairmanship of Steve Bannon, has put a stake through the heart of Andrew’s legacy. In my opinion, Steve Bannon is a bully, and has sold out Andrew’s mission in order to back another bully, Donald Trump; he has shaped the company into Trump’s personal Pravda, to the extent that he abandoned and undercut his own reporter, Breitbart News’ Michelle Fields, in order to protect Trump’s bully campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, who allegedly assaulted Michelle. I spoke with Michelle the night after the incident. She told me her story. That story was backed by audiotape, eyewitness testimony from The Washington Post’s Ben Terris, physical bruises, and video tape.
Both Lewandowski and Trump maligned Michelle in the most repulsive fashion. Meanwhile, Breitbart News not only stood by and did nothing outside of tepidly asking for an apology, they then attempted to abandon Michelle by silencing staff from tweeting or talking about the issue. Finally, in the ultimate indignity, they undermined Michelle completely by running a poorly-evidenced conspiracy theory as their lead story in which Michelle and Terris had somehow misidentified Lewandowski.
This is disgusting. Andrew never would have stood for it. No news outlet would stand for it.
Nobody should.
This truly breaks my heart. But, as I am fond of saying, facts don’t care about your feelings, and the facts are undeniable: Breitbart News has become precisely the reverse of what Andrew would have wanted. Steve Bannon and those who follow his lead should be ashamed of themselves.
Today I informed the management at Breitbart News of my immediate resignation. I do not believe Breitbart News has adequately stood by me during the events of the past week and because of that I believe it is now best for us to part ways.
The Drumpf Campaign has it all. Racism, Fascism, Misogyny, Victim Shaming, Bullying, Encouraging Violence against dissenters. A perfect campaign for the sick cult down here and a very sick segment of America in 2016: Zeig Heil Baby.
The Trump campaign’s victim-shaming response to the Michelle Fields
Catch up on the 2016 race
By Janell Ross March 14 at 1:50 PM
Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, center, looks on as the Republican presidential front-runner speaks at a news conference Aug. 25, 2015, in Dubuque, Iowa. (Charlie Neibergall/AP)
One day — one day very soon — someone will teach a course on Donald Trump's campaign tactics.
It will come with an eye-grabbing name like, "The Social Politics of Donald Trump's Political Theater" or "A Tour With Donald Trump Around the Grimmest Parts of the American Political Universe." Whatever it's called and wherever it's taught, there will probably have to be some time spent — perhaps an entire unit — on Trump and female journalists. And anyone who takes 10 minutes to dissect the tangled story of Breitbart reporter Michelle Fields, a woman who she and The Washington Post's Ben Terris say was grabbed and nearly pulled to the ground by Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, knows why right now.
In the days since this incident went public, a lot has happened.
As The Fix's Callum Borchers has reported, first the campaign reportedly conceded that something happened but insisted that Lewandowski would not have been quite so, um, hands-on, if he had been aware that Fields works for Breitbart. But one day later, the Trump campaign — or at least the select members of the staff who were speaking to the media — moved on from essentially explaining Lewandowski's behavior as something acceptable only when it comes to non-Breitbart journalists. They started pillorying Fields and telling reporters that the incident never happened. Meanwhile, Breitbart staff members did some digging and suggested that, while something clearly happened, Lewandowski may not have been the man who did the grabbing.
As Breitbart so generously put it Friday morning:
The Scrum: Video Emerges to Suggest WaPo Reporter Ben Terris Misidentifies Lewandowski in Fields Incident
Translation: It is not clear just who the arm-grabber was yet. It was, as Fields and others who resigned from Breitbart over the weekend said in interviews, as if the publication twisted itself into a pretzel to avoid an open confrontation with Trump or his campaign staff.
But let's take a moment to also recognize this: Before the latest Breitbart headlines, the video backing up Fields's and Terris's accounts and the resignations, in the hours after the Trump campaign started saying nothing at all happened, there was another kind of pillorying. If a playbook of sexist and repugnant tactics for discrediting, minimizing and shaming women who publicly accuse a man of any kind of wrongdoing existed, the Trump campaign and its supporters went through a very large portion of it.
First, it said it didn't happen. Then, perhaps independently, stories have emerged questioning Fields's choice in footwear and what role it may have played in her near-toppling; allegations that Fields has made false allegations of the same type in the past; and of course, last but not least, suggestions that Fields is an attention-seeking or confused young woman. Translation: Fields isn't credible. Fields isn't fit for involvement in serious political reporting. Fields put herself in a precarious position wearing her footwear of choice at Trump events now widely known to be a little more than rowdy. Fields may have imagined, made up and/or been too overwrought to accurately describe events.
If none of that, none of that at all, sounds familiar, think for a moment about what we all know is said with some frequency about women who accuse men of any kind of social, political or athletic import of wrongdoing — particularly any kind of sexual assault. Think for a moment about the more limited but not totally unrelated litany of things said about Monica Lewinsky — her clothing, her personal choices and personal history, her sanity and so on. Think of the way that Trump has already responded to tough but fair questions posed by Fox News's Megyn Kelly. He implied that her thinking, emotional control and professionalism were impaired because she was on her period.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump walks with his campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, left, after speaking at a news conference Aug. 25, 2015, in Dubuque, Iowa. (Charlie Neibergall/AP) Right: Reporter Michelle Fields (ABCNEWS.com)
In interviews this weekend, Fields said that the Trump campaign was trying to smear her. Fields, a self-identified conservative reporter, said that plainly. And it seems she's right; the pattern is quite clear. Questioning a woman's clothing, life choices, history and, when all else fails, emotional stability or fitness to engage in important work is a classic and time-tested method to distract or get around serious allegations — to avoid a public airing of germane facts. It is also classic sexism.
There's no need to dress that up and put it nicer than that. It is the way that women have been constrained to what some people think to be appropriate places, support roles and so on. In the century since women in this country gained the franchise and optional financial autonomy, this belief system and set of related practices aren't exactly standard. But when someone — typically a public figure and a man — finds himself in a spot of trouble, it seems that all too often they come right back to the aforementioned list.
It's a tactic that is effective in seeding doubt about what really happened and even decades of disdain and public shame (ask Monica Lewisky), in part, because it affirms what some people are already inclined to think about women. It also offers a convenient and distracting way to move public attention away from the core issue. In this case, the core issue is whether a member of Trump's campaign put hands on a reporter exercising a constitutionally protected right to ask questions and seek answers for publication.
This is unacceptable behavior at any level of any campaign in a democratic society with a free press. That the accusations have been made about a campaign that has, over the weekend, been criticized for stoking violent behavior among its supporters and violent response from protesters makes getting to the truth of this incident all the more important.
The thing is, this is 2016. The Trump campaign has, it seems for now, successfully muddied the waters, distracted some attention from the factual issues and constitutional matters at hand. But some voters — we won't get too optimistic about how many — are going to recognize and discuss the events outlined above with the long list of women subjected to this sort of public shaming in mind.
The Trump campaign’s victim-shaming response to the Michelle Fields
Catch up on the 2016 race
By Janell Ross March 14 at 1:50 PM
Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, center, looks on as the Republican presidential front-runner speaks at a news conference Aug. 25, 2015, in Dubuque, Iowa. (Charlie Neibergall/AP)
One day — one day very soon — someone will teach a course on Donald Trump's campaign tactics.
It will come with an eye-grabbing name like, "The Social Politics of Donald Trump's Political Theater" or "A Tour With Donald Trump Around the Grimmest Parts of the American Political Universe." Whatever it's called and wherever it's taught, there will probably have to be some time spent — perhaps an entire unit — on Trump and female journalists. And anyone who takes 10 minutes to dissect the tangled story of Breitbart reporter Michelle Fields, a woman who she and The Washington Post's Ben Terris say was grabbed and nearly pulled to the ground by Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, knows why right now.
In the days since this incident went public, a lot has happened.
As The Fix's Callum Borchers has reported, first the campaign reportedly conceded that something happened but insisted that Lewandowski would not have been quite so, um, hands-on, if he had been aware that Fields works for Breitbart. But one day later, the Trump campaign — or at least the select members of the staff who were speaking to the media — moved on from essentially explaining Lewandowski's behavior as something acceptable only when it comes to non-Breitbart journalists. They started pillorying Fields and telling reporters that the incident never happened. Meanwhile, Breitbart staff members did some digging and suggested that, while something clearly happened, Lewandowski may not have been the man who did the grabbing.
As Breitbart so generously put it Friday morning:
The Scrum: Video Emerges to Suggest WaPo Reporter Ben Terris Misidentifies Lewandowski in Fields Incident
Translation: It is not clear just who the arm-grabber was yet. It was, as Fields and others who resigned from Breitbart over the weekend said in interviews, as if the publication twisted itself into a pretzel to avoid an open confrontation with Trump or his campaign staff.
But let's take a moment to also recognize this: Before the latest Breitbart headlines, the video backing up Fields's and Terris's accounts and the resignations, in the hours after the Trump campaign started saying nothing at all happened, there was another kind of pillorying. If a playbook of sexist and repugnant tactics for discrediting, minimizing and shaming women who publicly accuse a man of any kind of wrongdoing existed, the Trump campaign and its supporters went through a very large portion of it.
First, it said it didn't happen. Then, perhaps independently, stories have emerged questioning Fields's choice in footwear and what role it may have played in her near-toppling; allegations that Fields has made false allegations of the same type in the past; and of course, last but not least, suggestions that Fields is an attention-seeking or confused young woman. Translation: Fields isn't credible. Fields isn't fit for involvement in serious political reporting. Fields put herself in a precarious position wearing her footwear of choice at Trump events now widely known to be a little more than rowdy. Fields may have imagined, made up and/or been too overwrought to accurately describe events.
If none of that, none of that at all, sounds familiar, think for a moment about what we all know is said with some frequency about women who accuse men of any kind of social, political or athletic import of wrongdoing — particularly any kind of sexual assault. Think for a moment about the more limited but not totally unrelated litany of things said about Monica Lewinsky — her clothing, her personal choices and personal history, her sanity and so on. Think of the way that Trump has already responded to tough but fair questions posed by Fox News's Megyn Kelly. He implied that her thinking, emotional control and professionalism were impaired because she was on her period.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump walks with his campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, left, after speaking at a news conference Aug. 25, 2015, in Dubuque, Iowa. (Charlie Neibergall/AP) Right: Reporter Michelle Fields (ABCNEWS.com)
In interviews this weekend, Fields said that the Trump campaign was trying to smear her. Fields, a self-identified conservative reporter, said that plainly. And it seems she's right; the pattern is quite clear. Questioning a woman's clothing, life choices, history and, when all else fails, emotional stability or fitness to engage in important work is a classic and time-tested method to distract or get around serious allegations — to avoid a public airing of germane facts. It is also classic sexism.
There's no need to dress that up and put it nicer than that. It is the way that women have been constrained to what some people think to be appropriate places, support roles and so on. In the century since women in this country gained the franchise and optional financial autonomy, this belief system and set of related practices aren't exactly standard. But when someone — typically a public figure and a man — finds himself in a spot of trouble, it seems that all too often they come right back to the aforementioned list.
It's a tactic that is effective in seeding doubt about what really happened and even decades of disdain and public shame (ask Monica Lewisky), in part, because it affirms what some people are already inclined to think about women. It also offers a convenient and distracting way to move public attention away from the core issue. In this case, the core issue is whether a member of Trump's campaign put hands on a reporter exercising a constitutionally protected right to ask questions and seek answers for publication.
This is unacceptable behavior at any level of any campaign in a democratic society with a free press. That the accusations have been made about a campaign that has, over the weekend, been criticized for stoking violent behavior among its supporters and violent response from protesters makes getting to the truth of this incident all the more important.
The thing is, this is 2016. The Trump campaign has, it seems for now, successfully muddied the waters, distracted some attention from the factual issues and constitutional matters at hand. But some voters — we won't get too optimistic about how many — are going to recognize and discuss the events outlined above with the long list of women subjected to this sort of public shaming in mind.
