Iran must be contained along with the Islamic State terrorist organization, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday
“Why do they need centrifuges? They say they need it for civilian nuclear energy. That’s not true. Other big countries … have civilian nuclear programs but not one centrifuge,” he said. “This way, you are giving them the ability to build a nuclear bomb.”
“Why do they need centrifuges? They say they need it for civilian nuclear energy. That’s not true. Other big countries … have civilian nuclear programs but not one centrifuge,” he said. “This way, you are giving them the ability to build a nuclear bomb.”
17 Countries around the world like Mexico,Canada, Indonesia.
Have civilian nuclear energy THEN DON'T HAVE ONE CENTRIFUGE.
You only need centrifuges for one thing and that is to enrich Uranium.
Centrifuges are not needed for civilian nuclear energy.
Centrifuges are for military use, for making bombs.
Have civilian nuclear energy THEN DON'T HAVE ONE CENTRIFUGE.
You only need centrifuges for one thing and that is to enrich Uranium.
Centrifuges are not needed for civilian nuclear energy.
Centrifuges are for military use, for making bombs.
He went on to warn that the world should not allow Iran, “the ultimate extremist power,” to gain more power.
Netanyahu warned that the West must not be pressured into allowing Iran to use cooperation with the US-led antiterror campaign as leverage for increased nuclear concessions.
“You don’t have to give Iran … what they want in the nuclear deal,” he said, explaining that Iran had already begun to fight the Syrian rebel forces from which IS emerged through its proxy, Hezbollah, before Obama announced the campaign. In recent weeks, Tehran warned that it may launch attacks against Islamic State near its borders.
“They’re going to fight ISIS anyway,” Netanyahu said. “If [Syrian President Bashar] Assad were to demand his chemical weapons back in return for fighting ISIS, he would be laughed out of court.”
He stressed that if the deal allows Iran to retain centrifuges and continue its uranium enrichment, Israel will consider it a “bad deal” proving Iran’s nuclear intentions were military.
Netanyahu warned that the West must not be pressured into allowing Iran to use cooperation with the US-led antiterror campaign as leverage for increased nuclear concessions.
“You don’t have to give Iran … what they want in the nuclear deal,” he said, explaining that Iran had already begun to fight the Syrian rebel forces from which IS emerged through its proxy, Hezbollah, before Obama announced the campaign. In recent weeks, Tehran warned that it may launch attacks against Islamic State near its borders.
“They’re going to fight ISIS anyway,” Netanyahu said. “If [Syrian President Bashar] Assad were to demand his chemical weapons back in return for fighting ISIS, he would be laughed out of court.”
He stressed that if the deal allows Iran to retain centrifuges and continue its uranium enrichment, Israel will consider it a “bad deal” proving Iran’s nuclear intentions were military.
The Nazis believed in a master race. The militant Islamists believe in a master faith. They just disagree about who among them will be the master… of the master faith. That’s what they truly disagree about. Therefore, the question before us is whether militant Islam will have the power to realize its unbridled ambitions.
There is one place where that could soon happen: The Islamic State of Iran.
For 35 years, Iran has relentlessly pursued the global mission which was set forth by its founding ruler, Ayatollah Khomeini, in these words:
We will export our revolution to the entire world.
Until the cry “There is no God but Allah” will echo throughout the world over…
There is one place where that could soon happen: The Islamic State of Iran.
For 35 years, Iran has relentlessly pursued the global mission which was set forth by its founding ruler, Ayatollah Khomeini, in these words:
We will export our revolution to the entire world.
Until the cry “There is no God but Allah” will echo throughout the world over…
Iran’s President Rouhani stood here last week,(The UN) and shed crocodile tears over what he called “the globalization of terrorism.”
Maybe he should spare us those phony tears and have a word instead with the commanders of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. He could ask them to call off Iran’s global terror campaign, which has included attacks in two dozen countries on five continents since 2011 alone.
To say that Iran doesn’t practice terrorism is like saying Derek Jeter never played shortstop for the New York Yankees.
Maybe he should spare us those phony tears and have a word instead with the commanders of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. He could ask them to call off Iran’s global terror campaign, which has included attacks in two dozen countries on five continents since 2011 alone.
To say that Iran doesn’t practice terrorism is like saying Derek Jeter never played shortstop for the New York Yankees.
This bemoaning of the Iranian president of the spread of terrorism has got to be one of history’s greatest displays of double-talk.
Now, some still argue that Iran’s global terror campaign, its subversion of countries throughout the Middle East and well beyond the Middle East, some argue that this is the work of the extremists.
They say things are changing. They point to last year’s elections in Iran. They claim that Iran’s smooth talking president and foreign minister, they’ve changed not only the tone of Iran’s foreign policy but also its substance. They believe Rouhani and Zarif genuinely want to reconcile with the West, that they’ve abandoned the global mission of the Islamic Revolution.
Really?
So let’s look at what Foreign Minister Zarif wrote in his book just a few years ago:
We have a fundamental problem with the West,
and especially with America.
This is because we are heirs to a global mission,
which is tied to our raison d’etre…
A global mission which is tied to our very reason of being.
And then Zarif asks a question, I think an interesting one.
He says:
How come Malaysia [he’s referring to an overwhelmingly Muslim country] — how come Malaysia doesn’t have similar problems?
And he answers:
Because Malaysia is not trying to change the international order.
That’s your moderate.
So don’t be fooled by Iran’s manipulative charm offensive. It’s designed for one purpose, and for one purpose only: To lift the sanctions and remove the obstacles to Iran’s path to the bomb.
The Islamic Republic is now trying to bamboozle its way to an agreement that will remove the sanctions it still faces, and leave it with the capacity of thousands of centrifuges to enrich uranium.
This would effectively cement Iran’s place as a threshold military nuclear power. In the future, at a time of its choosing, Iran, the world’s most dangerous state in the world’s most dangerous region, would obtain the world’s most dangerous weapons.
Now, some still argue that Iran’s global terror campaign, its subversion of countries throughout the Middle East and well beyond the Middle East, some argue that this is the work of the extremists.
They say things are changing. They point to last year’s elections in Iran. They claim that Iran’s smooth talking president and foreign minister, they’ve changed not only the tone of Iran’s foreign policy but also its substance. They believe Rouhani and Zarif genuinely want to reconcile with the West, that they’ve abandoned the global mission of the Islamic Revolution.
Really?
So let’s look at what Foreign Minister Zarif wrote in his book just a few years ago:
We have a fundamental problem with the West,
and especially with America.
This is because we are heirs to a global mission,
which is tied to our raison d’etre…
A global mission which is tied to our very reason of being.
And then Zarif asks a question, I think an interesting one.
He says:
How come Malaysia [he’s referring to an overwhelmingly Muslim country] — how come Malaysia doesn’t have similar problems?
And he answers:
Because Malaysia is not trying to change the international order.
That’s your moderate.
So don’t be fooled by Iran’s manipulative charm offensive. It’s designed for one purpose, and for one purpose only: To lift the sanctions and remove the obstacles to Iran’s path to the bomb.
The Islamic Republic is now trying to bamboozle its way to an agreement that will remove the sanctions it still faces, and leave it with the capacity of thousands of centrifuges to enrich uranium.
This would effectively cement Iran’s place as a threshold military nuclear power. In the future, at a time of its choosing, Iran, the world’s most dangerous state in the world’s most dangerous region, would obtain the world’s most dangerous weapons.
Allowing that to happen would pose the gravest threat to us all.
It’s one thing to confront militant Islamists on pick-up trucks, armed with Kalashnikov rifles. It’s another thing to confront militant Islamists armed with weapons of mass destruction.
I remember that last year, everyone here was rightly concerned about the chemical weapons in Syria, including the possibility that they would fall into the hands of terrorists.
That didn’t happen. And President Obama deserves great credit for leading the diplomatic effort to dismantle virtually all of Syria’s chemical-weapons capability.
Imagine how much more dangerous the Islamic State, ISIS, would be if it possessed chemical weapons. Now imagine how much more dangerous the Islamic state of Iran would be if it possessed nuclear weapons.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Would you let ISIS enrich uranium?
Would you let ISIS build a heavy water reactor?
Would you let ISIS develop intercontinental ballistic missiles?
Of course you wouldn’t.
Then you mustn’t let the Islamic state of Iran do those things either.
Because here’s what will happen:
Once Iran produces atomic bombs, all the charm and all the smiles will suddenly disappear. They’ll just vanish. It’s then that the ayatollahs will show their true face and unleash their aggressive fanaticism on the entire world.
There is only one responsible course of action to address this threat:
Iran’s nuclear military capabilities must be fully dismantled.
Make no mistake — ISIS must be defeated. But to defeat ISIS and leave Iran as a threshold nuclear power is to win the battle and lose the war.
To defeat ISIS and leave Iran as a threshold nuclear power is to win the battle and lose the war.
It’s one thing to confront militant Islamists on pick-up trucks, armed with Kalashnikov rifles. It’s another thing to confront militant Islamists armed with weapons of mass destruction.
I remember that last year, everyone here was rightly concerned about the chemical weapons in Syria, including the possibility that they would fall into the hands of terrorists.
That didn’t happen. And President Obama deserves great credit for leading the diplomatic effort to dismantle virtually all of Syria’s chemical-weapons capability.
Imagine how much more dangerous the Islamic State, ISIS, would be if it possessed chemical weapons. Now imagine how much more dangerous the Islamic state of Iran would be if it possessed nuclear weapons.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Would you let ISIS enrich uranium?
Would you let ISIS build a heavy water reactor?
Would you let ISIS develop intercontinental ballistic missiles?
Of course you wouldn’t.
Then you mustn’t let the Islamic state of Iran do those things either.
Because here’s what will happen:
Once Iran produces atomic bombs, all the charm and all the smiles will suddenly disappear. They’ll just vanish. It’s then that the ayatollahs will show their true face and unleash their aggressive fanaticism on the entire world.
There is only one responsible course of action to address this threat:
Iran’s nuclear military capabilities must be fully dismantled.
Make no mistake — ISIS must be defeated. But to defeat ISIS and leave Iran as a threshold nuclear power is to win the battle and lose the war.
To defeat ISIS and leave Iran as a threshold nuclear power is to win the battle and lose the war.
