Alternatively, it could just be that you don't understand the responsibility we all have as citizens of civilisation.
The Germans did it, they were so pissed off they blindly accepted their government line of BS in the thirties.
We have a responsibility to watch those Government bxstards whoever they are, especially if they go for escalation.
Just like Shrub has.
BTW Mr Muppet, OBL offered us Europeans a 'truce' a few months ago.
Hes still waiting for any reply...
Now, to stabilise civilisation, we just need you paranoid christian eejits across the atlantic to get your flipping house in order...
The Germans did it, they were so pissed off they blindly accepted their government line of BS in the thirties.
We have a responsibility to watch those Government bxstards whoever they are, especially if they go for escalation.
Just like Shrub has.
BTW Mr Muppet, OBL offered us Europeans a 'truce' a few months ago.
Hes still waiting for any reply...
Now, to stabilise civilisation, we just need you paranoid christian eejits across the atlantic to get your flipping house in order...
eek,
There's a big difference between sedition and decent. The moore liberals side with the terrorist.
I haven't seen Bush do anything close to what Hitler did. If Bush were a Hitler type why hasn't the US took over Canada and Mexico. The US could take all the oil producing countries in a few months. Luckily the US is not a country like Nazi-Germany and alot of the mid-east countries or the world would be in bad shape.
There's a big difference between sedition and decent. The moore liberals side with the terrorist.
I haven't seen Bush do anything close to what Hitler did. If Bush were a Hitler type why hasn't the US took over Canada and Mexico. The US could take all the oil producing countries in a few months. Luckily the US is not a country like Nazi-Germany and alot of the mid-east countries or the world would be in bad shape.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> I haven't seen Bush do anything close to what Hitler did. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Bush invaded a sovereign nation, against the wishes and protests of the entire world.
(And he aint leaving anytime soon neither, just like the aforementioned)
Why do you think no-one else in the world wants anything to do with this crap?
Get a grip man.
Why do you think that the US has shipped out all that nuclear waste ASAP?
Iraqi 'dirty bomb' risk dismissed
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3874315.stm
Is it in case they attack New York or London?
Cart it halfway around the flipping world in a suitcase..??
Gimme a friggen break.
Its so they don't lob it into US military bases in Iraq and make them uninhabitable.
(Hey dude, funny how they never mentioned that, huh? Only a Liberal can see the nose on his face huh.)
You guys are there for a looong time now, and you're on your own, so get used to it.
They don't need to attack the US anymore.
The mountain has come to Mohammed, in the shape of 150,000 personnel.
Bush invaded a sovereign nation, against the wishes and protests of the entire world.
(And he aint leaving anytime soon neither, just like the aforementioned)
Why do you think no-one else in the world wants anything to do with this crap?
Get a grip man.
Why do you think that the US has shipped out all that nuclear waste ASAP?
Iraqi 'dirty bomb' risk dismissed
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3874315.stm
Is it in case they attack New York or London?
Cart it halfway around the flipping world in a suitcase..??
Gimme a friggen break.
Its so they don't lob it into US military bases in Iraq and make them uninhabitable.
(Hey dude, funny how they never mentioned that, huh? Only a Liberal can see the nose on his face huh.)
You guys are there for a looong time now, and you're on your own, so get used to it.
They don't need to attack the US anymore.
The mountain has come to Mohammed, in the shape of 150,000 personnel.
eek,
The United States of America does not need permission from anyone to protect our national security. As you know by now France, Russia and Germany were getting rich off the oil for food scam, therefore we could have been hit with a nuke and they wouldn't have supported us. Bush connected the dots and Saddam had to go. That's good enough for most Americans and the others will be proven wrong just like Reagan did to the naysayers during the cold war.
The United States of America does not need permission from anyone to protect our national security. As you know by now France, Russia and Germany were getting rich off the oil for food scam, therefore we could have been hit with a nuke and they wouldn't have supported us. Bush connected the dots and Saddam had to go. That's good enough for most Americans and the others will be proven wrong just like Reagan did to the naysayers during the cold war.
Good luck GF.
We're actually more 'vulnerable' than you guys will ever be tho, here in Europe.
But theres no panic here, mobilisation, callup of reserves etc, like in the US.
In your defence, mainland USA never really got attacked before, so its something new and exciting for you to deal with.
Its the same old shit from a new bunch of eejits as far as us Euromuppets are concerned.
Compared with Hitler, they're a bunch of bumbling amateurs that can only inflict minor damage to our civilisation and our way of life.
As a Brit, Europe still has a far greater threat-potential, like when Yugoslavia exploded into genocide, and even today, the UN is the only thin line stopping that massacre happening again.
BTW you didn't insult eek-the-eejit once in this thread, I'm genuinely impressed sir.
[This message was edited by eek on July 08, 2004 at 09:33 PM.]
We're actually more 'vulnerable' than you guys will ever be tho, here in Europe.
But theres no panic here, mobilisation, callup of reserves etc, like in the US.
In your defence, mainland USA never really got attacked before, so its something new and exciting for you to deal with.
Its the same old shit from a new bunch of eejits as far as us Euromuppets are concerned.
Compared with Hitler, they're a bunch of bumbling amateurs that can only inflict minor damage to our civilisation and our way of life.
As a Brit, Europe still has a far greater threat-potential, like when Yugoslavia exploded into genocide, and even today, the UN is the only thin line stopping that massacre happening again.
BTW you didn't insult eek-the-eejit once in this thread, I'm genuinely impressed sir.
[This message was edited by eek on July 08, 2004 at 09:33 PM.]
I don't think they'd bother GF, but it makes good press copy, mucho exciting and all that.
They're too busy blowing up hundreds of their own that collaborate with the invaders.
Charity begins at home.
Priority 1 is ensuring that there is zero stability in Iraq.
Iraq is the new battleground.
Attacks on enemy territory, Europe. USA, are secondary now.
(Has no-one mentioned this, its pretty simple strategy IMO)
You guys now have a full scale warzone in Iraq, but no exit.
For myself, if I was an Islamic nutter dedicated to dying for the cause.
Get high level nuclear waste from Russia (where the good stuff is, the really buzzy stuff that lights up a geigercounter) with gold and dollars.
Stash it in a legit freighter.
Sail it into London or NY and blow it sky high.
Its worth bearing in mind that anyone with the same attitude could detonate a device in Damascus or Mecca, because Islam has been betrayed by those pragmatic arab lackeys of the west.
Both Islamic nutters, or CIA nutters could achieve this objective.
(Damascus actually, is a cultural centre of the civilised universe. But you will probaly only know about recent history
)
Anyway.
Its called mutual armageddon.
And like with the Russkies, most of us still need to be alive if the power mad people are going to realise their objective.
So let them tell us their tall stories, and get on with yer life.
They're too busy blowing up hundreds of their own that collaborate with the invaders.
Charity begins at home.
Priority 1 is ensuring that there is zero stability in Iraq.
Iraq is the new battleground.
Attacks on enemy territory, Europe. USA, are secondary now.
(Has no-one mentioned this, its pretty simple strategy IMO)
You guys now have a full scale warzone in Iraq, but no exit.
For myself, if I was an Islamic nutter dedicated to dying for the cause.
Get high level nuclear waste from Russia (where the good stuff is, the really buzzy stuff that lights up a geigercounter) with gold and dollars.
Stash it in a legit freighter.
Sail it into London or NY and blow it sky high.
Its worth bearing in mind that anyone with the same attitude could detonate a device in Damascus or Mecca, because Islam has been betrayed by those pragmatic arab lackeys of the west.
Both Islamic nutters, or CIA nutters could achieve this objective.
(Damascus actually, is a cultural centre of the civilised universe. But you will probaly only know about recent history
Anyway.
Its called mutual armageddon.
And like with the Russkies, most of us still need to be alive if the power mad people are going to realise their objective.
So let them tell us their tall stories, and get on with yer life.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>In your defence, mainland USA never really got attacked before, so its something new and exciting for you to deal with. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
eek,
Please, are you really this naive? I might be able to understand your ignorance on this issue if not for the fact that your country engaged in hostilities with the United States several times.
eek,
Please, are you really this naive? I might be able to understand your ignorance on this issue if not for the fact that your country engaged in hostilities with the United States several times.
I'm talking about recent memory UMB, in the last 100 odd years.
The hysteria generated in the USA after 9/11 looks kinda weird for us Euro dudes.
Give Afghanistan a slapping, then go home.
Job sorted.
Alternatively...lets get up to our necks in a pointless pile of poop and spend zillions of dollars to achieve pretty much nothing that does anyone anywhere any good whatsoever.
Anyway, now that you've escalated, you've got yourselves a nice full scale war in a far off land again, just like in the 60's.
You do realise that you did the Islamic extremists a huge favour by removing Saddam.
(OBL's wishlist to God would definitely include Saddam being overthrown.)
If Bush had been an OBL ally, removing Saddam would be one of OBLs requests to the Whitehouse.
Weird chit...
[This message was edited by eek on July 09, 2004 at 11:00 AM.]
The hysteria generated in the USA after 9/11 looks kinda weird for us Euro dudes.
Give Afghanistan a slapping, then go home.
Job sorted.
Alternatively...lets get up to our necks in a pointless pile of poop and spend zillions of dollars to achieve pretty much nothing that does anyone anywhere any good whatsoever.
Anyway, now that you've escalated, you've got yourselves a nice full scale war in a far off land again, just like in the 60's.
You do realise that you did the Islamic extremists a huge favour by removing Saddam.
(OBL's wishlist to God would definitely include Saddam being overthrown.)
If Bush had been an OBL ally, removing Saddam would be one of OBLs requests to the Whitehouse.
Weird chit...
[This message was edited by eek on July 09, 2004 at 11:00 AM.]
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by GAMEFACE:
The moore liberals side with the terrorist, OBL and Saddam over the President of the United States. This has to be a mental disorder. The enemies of the US would cut their throats also, makes no sense. It must be a mental disorder.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Disagreeing with the President's strategies, objectives and motives does not have to = siding with the terrorists, OBL and Saddam. I think that all this "with us or against us" narrow-minded radical Republican thinking must be a mental disorder. The utter incapability of digesting any nuanced concepts. Scary.
The moore liberals side with the terrorist, OBL and Saddam over the President of the United States. This has to be a mental disorder. The enemies of the US would cut their throats also, makes no sense. It must be a mental disorder.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Disagreeing with the President's strategies, objectives and motives does not have to = siding with the terrorists, OBL and Saddam. I think that all this "with us or against us" narrow-minded radical Republican thinking must be a mental disorder. The utter incapability of digesting any nuanced concepts. Scary.
